Heterochromatin and gene regulation in Drosophila

Current Opinion in Genetics and Development

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 193-202

  Elgin, Sarah C R ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ANIMAL CELL; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; CHROMOSOME INVERSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; DROSOPHILA; GENE CONTROL; GENE FUNCTION; HETEROCHROMATIN; MOSAICISM; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPORTER GENE; REVIEW; TELOMERE; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION; TRANSGENE; X CHROMOSOME;

EID: 0029921392     PISSN: 0959437X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-437X(96)80050-5     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Heitz E: Das heterochromatin der Moose. I Jehrb Wiss Botanik 1928, 69:762-818. [Title translation: Heterochromatin of moss.]
2. Heitz E: Das heterochromatin der Moose. I Jehrb Wiss Botanik 1928, 69:762-818. [Title translation: Heterochromatin of moss.]
3. Holmquist GR: Role of replication time in the control of tissue-specific gene expression. Am J Hum Genet 1987, 40:151-173.
4. Tilghman SM, Willard HF: Epigenetic regulation in mammals. In Chromatin Structure and Gene Expression. Edited by Elgin SCR. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1995:197-222.
5. Spofford JB: Position-effect variegation in Drosophila. In The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila. Edited by Ashburner M, Novitski E. New York: Academic Press; 1976:955-1018.
6. Weiler KS, Wakimoto BT: Heterochromatin and gene expression in Drosophila. Annu Rev Genet 1995, 29:577-605
7. var7. Chromosoma 1986, 94:492-504.
8. Loo E, Rine J: Silencing and heritable domains of gene expression. Annu Rev Genet 1995, 11:520-548.
9. 2). The results suggest that there is competition to package the telomeric gene in a euchromatic or heterochromatic form following replication.
10. Eissenberg JC, Elgin SCR, Paro R: Epigenetic regulation in Drosophila: a conspiracy of silence. In Chromatin Structure and Gene Expression. Edited by Elgin SCR. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1995:147-171
11. Orlando, V Paro R: Chromatin multiprotein complexes involved in the maintenance of transcription patterns. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1995, 5:174-179.
12. Bird AP: Gene number, noise reduction, and biological complexity. Trends Genet 1995, 11:94-100.
13. Spradling AC, Karpen GH: Sixty years of mystery. Genetics 1990, 126:779-784.
14. Zuckerkandl E: A possible role of "inert" heterochromatin in cell differentiation. Action and competition for "locking" molecules. Biochemie 1974, 56:937-954.
15. Locke J, Kotarski MA, Tartof KD: Dosage-dependent modifiers of position effect variegation in Drosophila and a mass action model that explains their effect Genetics 1988, 120:181-198.
16. Wakimoto BT, Hearn MG: The effects of chromosome rearrangements on the expression of heterochromatic genes in chromosome 2L of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 1990, 125:141-154.
17. Gatti M, Pimpinelli S: Functional elements in Drosophila melanogaster heterochromatin. Annu Rev Genet 1992, 26:239-275.
18. Hearn MG, Hedrick A, Grigliatti T, Wakimoto B: The effect of modifiers of position effect variegation on the variegation of heterochromatic genes of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 1991, 128:785-797.
19. Howe M, Dimitri P, Berloco M, Wakimoto BT: Cis-effects of heterochromatin on heterochromatic and euchromatic gene activity in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 1995, 140:1033-1045. P transposase mutagenesis was used to generate derivatives of a translocation that places a section of 2L heterochromatin in a euchromatic environment. One euchromatic and seven heterochromatic genes were then scored for their responses to different deletions of heterochromatic material. The genes differed in their response to the amount and specific block of heterochromatin present, demonstrating that heterochromatin is functionally mosaic.
20. ••]) presents an analysis of the distribution of several transposable elements by in situ hybridization on Drosophila metaphase chromosomes. Remarkably, the elements are found in blocks throughout the heterochromatic regions; 9 of 11 show stable patterns. These results change our view of sequence organization in heterochromatin.
21. ••].
22. Le MH, Duricka D, Karpen GH: Islands of complex DNA are widespread in Drosophila centric heterochromatin. Genetics 1995, 141:283-303. An analysis of rearranged derivatives of Drosophila minichromosome Dp1187 shows the presence of three 'islands' of complex DNA, surrounded by blocks of satellite DNA, in the pericentric heterochromatin.
23. ••]).
24. ••] were used to show that although Y chromosome sites are uniformly underrepresented in polytene chromosomes, multiple sites in the pericentric heterochromatin are fully represented. These DNA regions, made up of middle repetitive or unique sequences, appear to contribute to β-heterochromatin. These results, along with others, have changed our thinking about the structure of polytene chromosomes.
25. Devlin RH, Bingham BB, Wakimoto BT: The organization and expression of the light gene, a heterochromatic gene of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 1990, 125:129-140.
26. Pardue ML: Drosophila telomeres: another way to end it all. In Telomeres. Edited by Blackburn EH, Greider CW. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1995.
27. Sheen F-M, Levis RW: Transposition of the LINE-like retrotransposon TART to Drosophila chromosome termini. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994, 91:12510-12514. This paper demonstrates that the TART element, found in the telomeres of Drosophila, has many features of a retrotransposon and can transpose to broken chromosome ends.
28. ••].
29. Traverse K, Pardue ML: Studies of het DNA sequences in the pericentric regions of Drosophila chromosomes. Chromosoma 1989, 97:261-271.
30. Danilevskaya O, Slot F, Traverse KL, Hogan NC, Pardue ML: The Drosophila telomere transposon HeT-A produces a transcript with tightly bound protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994, 91:6679-6682. Further evidence is provided to support the hypothesis that HeT-A, identified earlier as a telomere element, functions as a retrotransposon.
31. Grigliatti T: Position-effect variegation-an assay for nonhistone chromosomal proteins and chromatin assembly and modifying factors. In Functional Organization of the Nucleus: A Laboratory Guide. Edited by Hamkalo BA, Elgin SCR. New York: Academic Press; 1991:588-625.
32. Reuter G, Spierer P: Position effect variegation and chromatin proteins. Bioessays 1992, 14:605-612.
33. James TC, Eissenberg JC, Craig C, Dietrich V, Hobson A, Elgin SCR: Distribution patterns of HP1, a heterochromatin-associated nonhistone chromosomal protein of Drosophila. Eur J Cell Biol 1989, 50:170-180.
34. Eissenberg JC, James TC, Foster-Hartnett DM, Hartnett T, Ngan V, Elgin SCR: Mutation in a heterochromatin-specific chromosomal protein is associated with suppression of position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990, 87:9923-9927.
35. Eissenberg JC, Morris GD, Reuter G, Hartnett T: The heterochromatin-associated protein HP1 is an essential protein in Drosophila with dosage-dependent effects on position-effect variegation. Genetics 1992, 131:345-352.
36. Wreggett KA, Hill F, James PS, Hutchings A, Butcher GW, Singh PB: A mammalian homologue of Drosophila heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) is a component of constitutive heterochromatin. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1994, 66:99-103.
37. Messmer S, Franke A, Paro R: Analysis of the functional role of the Polycomb chromo domain in Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Dev 1992, 6:1241 -1254.
38. Powers JA, Eissenberg JC: Overlapping domains of the heterochromatin-associated protein HP1 mediate nuclear localization and heterochromatin binding. J Cell Biol 1993, 120:291-299.
39. Platero JS, Hartnett T, Eissenberg JC: Functional analysis of the chromo domain of HP1. EMBO J 1995, 14:3977-3986. Various point mutations and a 'domain-swap' construct are used to show that the chromo domain in HP1 is critical for gene silencing and critical for the correct distribution of the protein. The results suggest that HP1 and Pc are both recruited to their binding sites by protein-protein interactions.
40. Koonin EV, Zhou S, Lucchesi, JC: The chromo superfamily: new members, duplication of the chromo domain and possible role in delivering transcription regulators to chromatin. Nucleic Acids Res 1995, 23:4229-4233.
41. Hecht A, Laroche T, Strahl-Bolsinger S, Gasser SM, Grunstein M: Histone H3 and H4 N-termini interact with SIR3 and SIR4 proteins: a molecular model for the formation of heterochromatin in yeast Cell 1995, 80:583-592. Evidence is provided to show that SIR3 and SIR4 interact directly with animo-terminal regions of histones H3 and H4 to generate the heterochromatic telomere structure found in yeast. This elegant result shows that the nucleosome array plays a critical role in generating the higher order structure.
42. Granok H, Leibovitch BA, Shaffer CD, Elgin SCR: Ga-ga over GAGA factor. Curr Biol 1995, 5:238-241.
43. n repeats and heat shock elements have distinct roles in chromatin structure and transcriptional activation of the Drosophila hsp26 gene. Mol Cell Biol 1993, 13:2802-2814.
44. Tsukiyama T, Becker PB, Wu C: ATP-dependent nucleosome disruption at a heat-shock promoter mediated by binding of GAGA transcription factor. Nature 1994, 367:525-532. An energy-dependent chromatin assembly system utilizes GAGA factor to create nucleosome-free regulatory regions at a heat-shock promoter. This represents a breakthrough in our efforts to understand how transcription factors may act in overcoming nucleosome-mediated repression
45. Farkas G, Gausz J, Galloni M, Keuter G, Gyurkovics H, Karch F: The Trithorax-like gene encodes the Drosophila GAGA factor. Nature 1994, 371:806-808. This paper reports identification of the gene encoding GAGA factor. Genetic analysis shows that GAGA factor is a member of the trithorax group, maintaining homeotic genes in the 'on' state, and that mutations in the gene lead to enhancement of PEV. Thus a protein characterized initially as a transcription factor can have very broad roles in chromatin structure.
46. Wallrath LL, Elgin SCR: Position effect variegation in Drosophila is associated with an altered chromatin structure. Genes Dev 1995, 9:1263-1277. A screen to identify transgenes displaying PEV results in the recovery of inserts at pericentric, fourth chromosome, and telomeric regions. The first two groups, but not the telomeric inserts, respond to known suppressors of PEV. Chromatin structure analysis of pericentric transgenes shows decreased accessibility of the promoter region and increased regularity of the nucleosome array, indicating altered chromatin packaging of genes subject to PEV.
47. Locke J, McDermid HE: Analysis of Drosophila chromosome 4 using pulsed field gel electrophoresis. Chromosoma 1993, 102:718-723.
48. Miklos GLG, Yamamoto MT, Davies J, Pirrotta V: Microcloning reveals a high frequency of repetitive sequences characteristic of chromosome 4 and β-heterochromatin of Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988, 85:2051-2055.
49. Lu BY, Bishop CP, Eissenberg JC: Developmental timing and tissue specificity of heterochromatin-mediated silencing. EMBO J 1996, in press. An hsp70-lacZ reporter can be used to assess inducible activity in a PEV environment for most cell types at most developmental times. Contrary to current models, silencing appears to be more effective in larval imaginal discs than in the adult eye, implying that the mosaic phenotype occurs by variegated relaxation of heterochromatic silencing in differentiated cells.
50. Wallrath LL, Guntur VP, Rosman LE, Elgin SCR: DNA representation of variegating heterochromatic P element inserts in diploid and polytene tissue of Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma 1996, in press. Heterochromatic hsp26 transgenes are present in approximately the same copy number as the endogenous euchromatin hsp26 gene in diploid tissue. Thus DNA loss does not appear to be a necessary part of the mechanism used to achieve PEV in this case.
51. Karpen GH, Spradling AC: Reduced DNA polytenization of a minichromosome region undergoing position effect variegation in Drosophila. Cell 1990, 63:97-107.
52. Loo S, Rine J: Silencers and domains of generalized repression. Science 1994, 264:1768-1771. Silencing at HMRa in yeast results in a general occlusion of the DNA in this region from sequence-specific interactions with proteins (restriction enzyme cleavage is blocked); the results imply a specialized, stable chromatin structure.
53. Allshire RC, Javerzat J-P, Redhead NJ, Cranston G: Position effect variegation at fission yeast centromeres. Cell 1994, 76:157-169. This paper demonstrates that genes placed within the centromeric heterochromatin of S. pombe, which show a variegated phenotype, have assumed the distinctive chromatin structure typical of that region.
54. Kellum R, Alberts BM: Heterochromatin protein 1 is required for correct chromosome segregation in Drosophila embryos. J Cell Sci 1995, 108:1419-1431.
55. Ekwall K, Javerzat J-P, Lorentz A, Schmidt H, Cranston G, Allshire RC: The chromo domain protein Swi6: a key component of fission yeast centromeres. Science 1995, 269: 1429-1431. The Swi6 protein, previously demonstated to affect heterochromatic silencing, is shown here to localize with the silent mating type loci, centromeres, and telomeres. In cells lacking Swi6 protein, centromeres lag on the spindle during anaphase and chromosomes are lost at a high rate.
56. Chuang P-T, Albertson DG, Meyer BJ: DPY-27: a chromosome condensation protein homolog that regulates C. elegans dosage compensation through association with the X chromosome. Cell 1994, 79:459-474.
57. Raff JW, Kellum R, Alberts B: The Drosophila GAGA transcription factor is associated with specific regions of heterochromatin throughout the cell cycle. EMBO J 1994, 13:5977-5983.
58. Bhat KM, Gausz J, Farkas G, Gyurkovics H, Karch F, Schedl P: The GAGA factor is required in the early Drosophila embryo not only for transcriptional regulation but also for nuclear division. Development 1996, in press.
59. Gilson E, Gasser SM: Repressor activator protein 1 and its ligands: organizing chromatin domains. Nucleic Acids and Mol Biol 1995, 9:308-327.
60. Zink D, Paro R: Drosophila Polycomb-group regulated chromatin inhibits the accessibility of a trans-activator to its target DNA. EMBO J 1995, 14:5660-5671. Using a GAL4-regulated reporter gene, it is shown that a PRE element from the bithorax complex behaves as an orientation-dependent silencer, inducing mosaic expression on neighboring genes. Observations on polytene chromosomes indicate a competition between binding of the Pc complex and binding of GAL4, with the presence of one excluding the other.
61. Cartwright IL, Hertzberg RP, Dervan PB, Elgin SCR: Cleavage of chromatin with methidiumproply EDTA iron (II). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1983, 80:3213-3217.
62. Van Holde K, Zlatanova J: Chromatin higher order structure: chasing a mirage? J Biol Chem 1995, 270:8373-8376.
63. Dorer DR, Henikoff S: Expansions of transgene repeats cause heterochromatin formation and gene silencing in Drosophila. Cell 1994, 77:993-1002. Closely linked repeats of a P transposon carrying a white transgene were found to cause white variegation. These phenotypes were sensitive to known modifiers of PEV, and to proximity to centric heterochromatin. The authors suggest that pairing of repeats triggers heterochromatin formation.
64. Walter MF, Jang C, Kasravi B, Donath J, Mechler BM, Mason JM, Biessmann H: DNA organization and polymorphism of a wild-type Drosophila telomere region. Chromosoma 1995, 104:229-241.
65. Paro R, Hogness D: The Polycomb protein shares a homologous domain with a heterochromatin-associated protein of Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992, 88:263-267.
66. Aasland R, Stewart AF: The chromo shadow domain, a second chromo domain in heterochromatin-binding protein, HP1. Nucleic Acids Res 1995, 23:3168-3173.