Improving consonant intelligibility for Ineraid patients fit with continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) processors by enhancing contrast among channel outputs

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 308-313

  Dorman, Michael F ^a,b   Loizou, Philipos C ^c  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT LITTLE ROCK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY SYSTEM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FILTRATION; FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; HUMAN; SAMPLING; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

EID: 0029761213     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199608000-00002     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Blumstein, S., & Stevens, K. (1979). Acoustic invariance in speech production: Evidence from measurements of the spectral characteristics of stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66, 1001-1017.
2. Boex, C., Pelizzone, M., & Montandon, P. (1994). Improvements in speech recognition with the CIS strategy for the Ineraid multichannel intracochlear implant. In I. Hochmair-Desoyer & E. Hochmair (Eds.), Advances in Cochlear Implants (pp. 136-140). Vienna: International Interscience Seminars.
3. Dorman, M. (1994). Mechanisms of formant frequency resolution with the Ineraid cochlear implant. In I. Hochmair-Desoyer & E. Hochmair (Eds.), Advances in Cochlear Implants (pp. 302-305). Mantz: International Interscience Seminars.
4. Dorman, M., Smith, L., Smith, M., & Parkin, J. (1996). Frequency discrimination, and speech recognition by patients who use the Ineraid, and CIS cochlear-implant signal processors. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America., 99, 1174-1184.
5. Dorman, M., Soli, S., Dankowski, K., Smith, L., McCandless, G., & Parkin, J. (1990). Acoustic cues for consonant identification by patients who use the Ineraid cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 2074-2079.
6. Eddington, D. (1980). Speech discrimination in deaf subjects with cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 68, 885-891.
7. Lawson, D., Wilson, B., & Finley, C. (1993). New processing strategies for multichannel cochlear prostheses. In J. Allum, D. Allum-Mecklenburg, F. Harris, & R. Probst, (Eds.), Progress in Brain Research, Vol. 97 (pp. 313-321). New York: Elsevier Science Publishers.
8. Van Tassel, D., Soli, S., Kirby, V., & Widin, G. (1987). Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82, 1152-1161.
9. Wilson, B., Finley, C., Lawson, D., Wolford, R., Eddington, D., & Rabinowitz, W. (1991). Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature, 352, 236-238.
10. Zierhofer, C., Peter, O., Bril, S., Pohl, P., Hochmair-Desoyer, I., & Hochmair, E. (1994). A multichannel cochlear implant system for high-rate pulsatile stimulation strategies. In I. Hochmair-Desoyer & E. Hochmair (Eds.), Advances in Cochlear Implants (pp. 204-207). Mantz: International Interscience Seminare.