Frequency discrimination and speech recognition by patients who use the Ineraid and continuous interleaved sampling cochlear-implant signal processors

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 99, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 1174-1184

  Dorman, Michael F ^a,b   Smith, Luther M ^c   Smith, Michael ^a   Parkin, James L ^b  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^c AURORA SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; FEMALE; FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAMPLING; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; WORD RECOGNITION;

ADULT; AGED; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PHONETICS; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION TESTS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0030060014     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.414600     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Boex, C., Pellizone, M., and Montandon, P. (1994). "Improvements in speech understanding with the CIS strategy for the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant," in Advances in Cochlear Implants, edited by I. Hochmair-Desoyer and E. Hochmair (International Interscience Seminars, Wien), pp. 136-140.
2. Dorman, M. (1993). "Speech recognition by adult users of cochlear implants," in Cochlear Implants: Audiological Foundations, edited by R. Tyler (Singular, San Diego), pp. 145-190.
3. Dorman, M., Dankowski, K., McCandless, G., and Smith, L. (1989). "Identification of synthetic vowels by patients using the Symbion multichannel cochlear implant," Ear Hear. 10, 40-43.
4. Dorman, M., Smith, L., McCandless, G., Dunnavant, G , Parkin, J., and Dankowski, K. (1990a). "Pitch scaling and speech understanding by patients who use the Ineraid cochlear implant," Ear Hear. 11, 310-315.
5. Dorman, M. F., Soli, S., Dankowski, K., Smith, L., McCandless, G., and Parkin, J. (1990b). "Acoustic cues for consonant identification by patients who use the Ineraid cochlear implant," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 2074-2079.
6. Eddington D. (1980). "Speech discrimination in deaf subjects with cochlear implants," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 68, 885-891.
7. Hochmair-Desoyer, I., Hochmair, E., Burian, K., and Suglbrunner, H. (1983). "Percepts from the Vienna cochlear prosthesis," in Cochlear Prostheses, edited by C. Parkins and S. Anderson (New York Academy of Sciences, New York), pp. 295-306.
8. Hochmair-Desoyer, I., Hochmair, E., and Stiglbrunner, H. (1985). "Psychoacoustic temporal processing and speech understanding in cochlear implant patients," in Cochlear Implants, edited by R. A. Schindler and M. M. Merzenich (Raven, New York), pp 291-304
9. Pichney, M., Durlach, N., and Braida, L. (1985). "Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing I: Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech," J. Speech Hear. Res. 28, 96-103.
10. Shannon, R. (1993). "Psychophysics," in Cochlear Implants: Audiological Foundations, edited by R. Tyler (Singular, San Diego), pp. 145-190.
11. Townshend, B , Cotter, N., Compernolle, D., and White, R. (1987) "Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82, 106-115.
12. Tyler, R. and Moore, B. (1992). "Consonant recognition by some of the better cochlear-implant patients," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92, 3068-3077.
13. Tyler, R., Moore, B., and Kuk, F. (1989). "Performance of some of the better cochlear-implant patients," J. Speech Hear. Res. 32, 887-911.
14. Wilson, B., Lawson, D., Finley, C., Wolford, R., Eddington, D., and Rabinowitz, W. (1991). "Better speech recognition with cochlear implants," Nature 352, 236-238.
15. Wilson, B., Lawson, D., and Zerbi, M. (1994a). "Speech processors for auditory prostheses," Sixth Quarterly Progress Report on NIH Contract No. N01-DC-2-2401.
16. Wilson, B., Lawson, D., Zerbi, M., and Finley, C. (1994b). "Recent developments with the CIS strategies," in Advances in Cochlear Implants, edited by I. J. Hochmair-Desoyer and E. S. Hochmair (International Interscience Series, Wein). pp. 103-112