Reducing emissions from in-use vehicles: An evaluation of the Phoenix inspection and maintenance program using test results and independent emissions measurements

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 4, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 359-376

  Wenzel, Tom ^a  

^a LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Inspection and maintenance; Vehicle emissions; Vehicle repairs

Indexed keywords

PHOENIX;

EID: 0013495035     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1462-9011(01)00032-6     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Acurex Environmental Corporation, 1997. Update of Fleet Characterization Data for Use in MOBILE6. Prepared for US EPA under contract 68-C6-0068. Acurex Environmental report 97-1050. May 16.
2. Ando A.W., Harrington W., McConnell V. Estimating full IM240 emissions from partial test results: evidence from Arizona. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. 49:1999;1153-1167.
3. Arizona State Legislature, Vehicle Emissions Inspection Legislative Study Committee, 1999. Discussion of VEI Testing Station Investigation and Arrests. Minutes of Meeting, Tuesday, September 21, Forty-fourth Legislature - First Regular Session.
4. Behavior Research Center, 1999. News Release, Rocky Mountain Poll - Arizona (98-IV-11): Arizonans' Attitudes and Actions on Auto Emissions Testing, December 21.
5. Bishop G.A., Stedman D.H., Ashbaugh L. Motor vehicle emissions variability. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. 46:1996;667-675.
6. Glover, E., Brzezinski, D., 1997. Analysis of the Arizona IM240 Test Program and Comparison with the TECH5 Model. US EPA report 420-R-97-001. May.
7. Harrington W., McConnell V., Ando A. Are vehicle emission inspection programs living up to expectations? Transportation Research Part D. 5:2000;153-172.
8. Jimenez, J.L., McClintock, P., McRae, G.J. Nelson, D.D., Zahniser, M.S., 1998. Vehicle Specific Power: A Useful Parameter for Remote Sensing and Emission Studies. Presented at the 9th CRC On-Road Vehicle Emissions Workshop, San Diego, CA.
9. Knepper, J.C., Koehl, W.J., Benson, J.D., Burns, V.R., Gorse Jr., R.A., Hochhauser, A.M., Leppard, W.R., Rapp, L.A., Reuter., R.M., 1993. Fuel Effects in Auto/Oil High Emitting Vehicles. SAE Technical Paper Series, 930137.
10. Pokharel, S.S., Stedman, D.H., Bishop, G.A., 1999. Intercomparison of On-Road Vehicle Emissions Measurements from Three Remote Sensing Devices. University of Denver. September.
11. Radian International, 1996. Exemption of Vehicles from I/M Requirements in the Phoenix Area: the Arizona Clean Screen Program. Prepared for Arizona Department of Environmental Quality. December 4.
12. Rendahl, C.S., 1997. Intercomparisons between Smog Dog RES and RSTi RSD. November 11.
13. Stedman D.H., Bishop G.A., Aldrete P., Slott R.S. On-road evaluation of an automobile emission test program. Environmental Science and Technology. 31:1997;927-931.
14. US EPA, 1998. Inspection and Maintenance (I/M) Program Effectiveness Methodologies. US EPA Office of Air and Radiation, EPA420-S-98-015, October.
15. Wenzel, T., Singer, B.C., Slott, R., 2000. Some issues in the statistical analysis of vehicle emissions. Journal of Transportation Statistics, 3(2), 1-14.