Motor Vehicle Emissions Variability

Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association

Volumn 46, Issue 7, 1996, Pages 667-675

  Bishop, Gary A ^a   Stedman, Donald H ^a   Ashbaugh, Lowell ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DENVER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR POLLUTION; CARBON MONOXIDE; EXHAUST GASES; MAINTENANCE; TESTING;

CLOSED LOOP EMISSIONS CONTROL SYSTEMS; MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS; VARIABILITY;

VEHICLES;

CARBON DIOXIDE; HYDROCARBON;

AIR POLLUTION; ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; EXHAUST GAS; MOTOR VEHICLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REMOTE SENSING;

EID: 0030200084     PISSN: 10473289     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10473289.1996.10467501     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Calvert, J.G.; Heywood, J.B.; Sawyer, R.F.; Seinfeld, J.H. –Achieving acceptable air quality: Some reflections on controlling vehicle emissions,— Science 1993, 261, 37.
2. National Research Council Committee on Tropospheric Ozone Formation and Measurement. Rethinking the Ozone Problem in Urban and Regional Air Pollution, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1991.
3. Ingalls, M.N.; Smith, L.R.; Kirksey, R.E. –Measurement of on-road vehicle emission factors in the California South Coast Air Basin-Volume I: Regulated emissions.— Final Report No. SWRI-1604 from Southwest Research Institute to the Coordinating Research Council, Atlanta, GA, June 1989.
4. Pierson, W.R.; Gertler, A.W.; Bradow, R.L.–Comparison of the SCAQS tunnel study with other on-road vehicle emission data,— J. Air &Waste Manage. Assoc. 1990, 40, 1495.
5. Fujita, E.M.; Croes, B.E.; Bennett, C.L.; Lawson, D.R.; Lurmann, F.W.; Main, H.H. –Comparison of emission inventory and ambient concentration ratios of CO, NMOG, and NOx in California's south coast air basin,— J. Air &Waste Manage. Assoc. 1992, 42, 264.
6. Fujita, E.M.; Watson, J.G.; Chow, J.C; Lu, Z. –Validation of the chemical mass balance receptor model applied to hydrocarbon source apportionment in the southern California air quality study,— J. Air &Waste Manage. Assoc. 1994, 28, 1633.
7. Glover, E.L.; Brzezinski, D.J. –MOBILE4, Exhaust emission factors and inspection/maintenance benefits for passenger cars,— U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Ann Arbor, 1989; EPA-AA-TSS-I/M-89-3.
8. McCargar, J.A.; Snapp, L.M. –Report on the EPA/Manufacturer Cooperative I/M Testing Program,— U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Ann Arbor, 1992; EPA/AA/EPSD-I/M-92-01.
9. Ashbaugh, L.L.; Lawson, D.R. –A comparison of emissions from mobile sources using random roadside surveys conducted in 1985, 1987, and 1989,— Air & Waste Management Association, Vancouver, B.C., June 1991; Paper No. 91-180.58.
10. Beaton, S.P.; Bishop, G.A.; Zhang, Y.; Ashbaugh, L.L.; Lawson, D.R.; Stedman, D.H. –On-road vehicle emissions: Regulations, costs, and benefits,— Science 1995, 268, 991.
11. Lawson, D.R. –'Passing the test'-human behavior and California's smog check program,— J. Air &Waste Manage. Assoc. 1993, 43, 1567.
12. Brown, N.D.; Glover, E.L.; Clemmens, W.B. –Effect of engine condition on FTP emissions and in-use repairability,— Society of Automotive Engineers; Paper No. 940302; 1992.
13. Austin, T.C.; DiGenova, F.J.; Carlson, T.R. –Analysis of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of remote sensing devices,— report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Sierra Research, Inc., 1994.
14. Austin, T.C.; Carlson, T.R.; Gianolini, K.A. –An evaluation of 'remote sensing' for the measurement of vehicle emissions,— report to the California Air Resources Board and the California I/M Review Committee, Sacramento, August 28, 1990; Paper No. SR90-08-02.
15. Stedman, D.H.; Bishop, G.A.; Beaton, S.P.; Peterson, J.E.; Guenther, P.L.; McVey, I.F.; Zhang, Y. –On-road remote sensing of CO and HC emissions in California,— Final Report, Contract #A032-093, California Air Resources Board Research Division, February, 1994.
16. Ashbaugh, L.L.; Lawson, D.R.; Bishop, G.A.; Guenther, P.L.; Stedman, D.H.; Stephens, R.D.; Groblicki, P.J.; Johnson, B.J.; Huang, S.C. –On-road remote sensing of carbon monoxide and hydrocarbon emissions during several vehicle operating conditions—, presented at Air & Waste Management Association International Specialty Conference on PM10 Standards and Non-traditional Source Controls, Phoenix, AZ 1992.
17. Stedman, D.H.; Bishop, G.A. –Remote sensing for mobile source CO emission reduction,— U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, 1991; EPA 600/4-90/032.
18. Lawson, D.R.; Groblicki, P.J.; Stedman, D.H.; Bishop, G.A.; Guenther, P.L. –Emissions from in-use motor vehicles in Los Angeles: A pilot study of remote sensing and the inspection and maintenance program,— J. Air &Waste Manage. Assoc. 1990, 40, 1096.
19. Federal Register, 21(60), Part II, 1966.
20. Federal Register, 33(108), Part II, 1968.
21. Federal Register, 35(214), Part II, 1970.
22. Federal Register, 36(128), Part II, 1971.
23. Berg, D. –Survey of sources of test variability in the 1975 federal test procedure—, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Motor Vehicle Emissions Laboratory, Ann Arbor, ML, 1978.
24. Knepper, J.C.; Koehl, W.J.; Benson, J.D.; Burns, V.R.; Gorse, Jr., R.A.; Hochhauser, A.M.; Leppard, W.R.; Rapp, L.A.; Reuter, R.M. –Fuel effects in auto/oil high emitting vehicles,— Soc. Automotive Eng.; Paper No. 930137; 1993.
25. Clean Air Act as Amended. –Provisions for attainment and maintenance of national ambient air quality standards,— U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., November 15,1990; Public Law 101-549.
26. California Air Resources Board. –Technologies to improve the detection of high-emitting vehicles in a vehicle inspection program,— El Monte, CA, December 1992.
27. Harrington, W; McConnell, V. –Modeling in-use vehicle emissions and the effects of inspection and maintenance programs,— J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1994, 44, 791-199.
28. United States General Accounting Office. –Air pollution: Unresolved issues may hamper success of EPA's proposed emissions program—, report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, Washington, D.C., 1992; Paper No. GAO/RCED-92-288.
29. Smith, L.R. –Variability of I/M test scores over time,— U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Ann Arbor, 1988; EPA 460/3-88-008.
30. Stedman, D.H.; Bishop, G.A. –An analysis of on-road remote sensing as a tool for automobile emissions control,— Illinois Department of Energy and Natural Resources, Springfield, IL, 1990; ILENR/RE-AQ-90/05.
31. Stedman, D.H.; Bishop, G.A.; Peterson, J.E.; Guenther, PL.; McVey, I.F.; Beaton, S.P. –On-road carbon monoxide and hydrocarbon remote sensing in the Chicago area,— Illinois Department of Energy and Natural Resources, Springfield, 1991; ILENR/RE-AQ-91/14.
32. California I/M Review Committee. –Evaluation of the California Smog Check program and recommendations for program improvements,— Fourth Report to the Legislature, Sacramento, CA, 1993.
33. Harrington, W.; McConnell, V.D. –Cost effectiveness of remote sensing of vehicle emissions,— in Cost Effective Control of Urban Smog (R.F. Kosobud, W.A. Testa, D.A. Hanson, Eds.), Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Chicago, 1993; pp. 53-75.
34. Colorado Department of Health. –1988-89 oxygenated fuels program,— Final report to the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission, Denver, CO, 1989.
35. Guenther, P.; Stedman, D.; Bishop, G.; Lesko, J. –University of Denver carbon monoxide emissions control program,— Final report to the City and County of Denver, CO, July 1994.
36. Pitchford, M.; Johnson, B. –Empirical model of vehicle emissions,— Environ. Sci. & Tech. 1993, 27, 741.
37. Lawson, D.R. –The cost of M in I/M-Reflections on inspection/maintenance programs,— J. Air &WasteManage. Assoc. 1995,45, 465.