On the TTSC-FTSC Formulation of Standard Parsimony

Cladistics

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 239-248

  De Laet, Jan ^a   Smets, Erik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0013470995     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1998.tb00337.x     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. De Laet, J. (1997). "A reconsideration of three-item analysis, the use of implied weights in cladistics, and a practical application in Gentianaceae". Ph.D. thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
2. Deleporte, P. (1996). Three-taxon statements and phylogeny reconstruction. Cladistics 12, 273-289.
3. de Pinna, M. C. C. (1991). Concepts and tests of homology in the cladistic paradigm. Cladistics 7, 367-394.
4. Farris, J. S. (1983). The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis. In "Advances in Cladistics" N. Platnick, and V. A. Funk (Eds) Vol. 2, pp. 7-36. Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the Willi Hennig Society. Columbia University Press, New York.
5. Farris, J. S. (1989). The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5, 417-419.
6. Farris, J. S. (1991). Hennig defined paraphyly. Cladistics 7, 297-304.
7. Nelson, G. (1971). Paraphyly and polyphyly: Redefinitions. Syst. Zool. 20, 471-472.
8. Nixon, K. C., and Carpenter, J. M. (1993). On outgroups. Cladistics 9, 413-426.
9. Nelson, G., and Ladiges, P. (1992). Information content and fractional weight of three-item statements. Syst. Biol. 41, 490-494.
10. Nelson, G., and Platnick, N. I. (1991). Three-taxon statements: A more precise use of parsimony. Cladistics 7, 351-366.
11. Oosterbroek, P. (1987). More appropriate definitions of paraphyly and polyphyly, with a comment on the Farris 1974 model. Syst. Zool. 36, 103-108.