Cyber pedagogy as critical social practice in a teacher education program

Teaching Education

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 211-229

  Kapitzke, Cushla ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0013157958     PISSN: 10476210     EISSN: 14701286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713698968     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. BENEDIKT, M., 1991. Cyberspace: First steps, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. BRADY, K., 1998. Teaching as women's work?. Teaching and Teacher's Work, 6(4): 1–12.
3. CENTRE FOR EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH AND INNOVATION. 1996. Information technology and the future of post-secondary education, Paris: OECD.
4. COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA. 1997. Digital rhetorics: Literacies and technologies in education-Current practices and future directions, Vols. 1-3, Canberra: Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
5. CUNNINGHAM, S., TAPSALL, S., RYAN, Y., STEDMAN, L., BAGDON, K., and FLEW, T., 1998. New media and borderless education: A review of the convergence between global media networks and higher education provision, Canberra: Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
6. DE CASTELL, S., LUKE, A., and LUKE, C., eds. 1989. Language, authority and criticism: Readings on the school textbook, London: Falmer Press.
7. DEVLIN, K.J., 1997. Goodbye, Descartes: The end of logic and the search for a new cosmology of the mind, New York: Wiley.
8. DRENGSON, A.R., 1995. The practice of technology: Exploring technology, ecophilosophy, and spiritual disciplines for vital links, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
9. FEENBERG, A., 1991. Critical theory of technology, New York: Oxford University Press.
10. FOUCAULT, M., 1977. Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
11. FOUCAULT, M., 1979. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
12. GREEN, B., 1998. “ Teaching for difference: Learning theory and post-critical pedagogy ”. In Teaching popular culture: Beyond radical pedagogy, Edited by: BUCKINGHAM, D., 177–197. London: UCL Press.
13. HODAS, S., 1996. “ Technology refusal and the organizational culture of schools ”. In Computerization and controversy: Value con¯ icts and social choices, (2nd ed.), Edited by: KLING, R., 197–218. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
14. INFORMATION INDUSTRIES TASKFORCE. 1997. The global information economy: The way ahead, Canberra: Department of Industry Science and Tourism.
15. JORDAN, T., 1999. Cyberpower: The culture and politics of cyberspace and the Internet, New York: Routledge.
16. KAPITZKE, C., in press. The sociality and speciality of online pedagogy and collaborative learning in an educational media and technologies course. Educational Technology and Society.
17. KERSHAW, A., and SAFFORD, S., 1998. From order to chaos: The impact of educational telecommunications on post-secondary education. Higher Education, 35(3): 285–298.
18. LANHAM, R.A., 1993. The electronic word: Democracy, technology, and the arts, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19. LATOUR, B., 1991. “ Technology is society made durable ”. In A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination, Edited by: LAW, J., 103–131. London: Routledge.
20. LAW, J., 1991. A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination, London: Routledge.
21. LUKE, C., 1997. “ Media literacy and cultural studies ”. In Constructing critical literacies: Teaching and learning textual practice, Edited by: MUSPRATT, S., LUKE, A., and FREEBODY, P., Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
22. LUKE, C., 2000. “ Cyber-schooling and technological change: Multiliteracies for new times ”. In Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures, Edited by: COPE, B., and KALANTZIS, M., 69–91. London: Routledge.
23. MERRIAM, S.B., 1998. Qualitative research and case study applications in education, (2nd ed.), San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
24. NEGROPONTE, N., 1995. Being digital, Rydalmere, NSW: Hodder Australia.
25. NEW LONDON GROUP. 1996. A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1): 60–92.
26. PETERS, M., 1996. Cybernetics, cyberspace and the politics of university reform. Australian Journal of Education, 40(2): 162–176.
27. POSTMAN, N., 1993. Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology, New York: Vintage Books.
28. PRIVATEER, P.M., 1999. Academic technology and the future of higher education: Strategic paths taken and not taken. The Journal of Higher Education, 70(1): 60–79.
29. SNYDER, I., ed. 1998. Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era, London: Routledge.
30. SPENDER, D., 1996. Nattering on the net: Women, power and cyberspace, Toronto: Garamond Press.
31. TAPSALL, S., and RYAN, Y., 1999. “ Virtual education institutions in Australia: Between the idea and the reality ”. In The development of virtual education: A global perspective, Edited by: FARRELL, G.M., 147–164. Vancouver: Commonwealth of Learning.
32. TILES, M., and OBERDIEK, H., 1995. Living in a technological culture: Human tools and human values, London: Routledge.
33. WILSON, B.G., 1997. Thoughts on theory in educational technology. Educational Technology, 37(1): 22–27.
34. WRESCH, W., 1996. Disconnected: Haves and have-nots in the information age, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.