A performance-based representation for engineering design

Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME

Volumn 123, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 486-493

  Zhu, Liang ^a   Kazmer, David ^a  

^a University of Massachusetts   (United States)

Author keywords

Constraint based design; Engineering design representation; Multiple attributes; Quality function deployment; Systems design

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012975954     PISSN: 10500472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1115/1.1401021     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Paz-Soldan, J. P, and Rinderle, J. R., 1989, The Alternate Use of Abstraction and Refinement in Conceptual Mechanical Design, ASME Winter Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA.
2. Rinderle, J. R., and Krishnan, V, 1990, Constraint Reasoning in Concurrent Design, ASME, Design Technical Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, Chicago, IL.
3. Thornton, A. C., 1996, “The Use of Constraint-Based Design Knowledge to Improve the Search for Feasible Designs,” Eng. Applic. Artif. Intell., 9, No. 4, pp. 393-402.
4. Kusiak, A., Wang, J., et al., 1996, “Negotiation in Constraint-Based Design,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 118, No. 4, pp. 470-477.
5. Umeda, Y, and Tomiyama, T., 1997, “Functional Reasoning in Design,” Geoexploration, 12, No. 2, pp. 42-48.
6. Iwasaki, Y, et al., 1993, How Things Are Intended to Work: Capturing Functional Knowledge in Device Design, Proc. Int’l Joint Conf. AI, Menlo Park, California, AAAI Press.
7. Sturges, R. H., O’Shaughnessy, K., et al. 1996, “Computational Model for Conceptual Design Based on Extended Function Logic,” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM, 10, No. 4, pp. 255-274.
8. S. Szykman, Racz, J. W., et al., 1999, The Representation of Function in Computer-Based Design, Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, DETC99/DTM-8742.
9. Stone, R. B., and Wood, K. L., 1999, Development of A Functional Basis for Design, Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, DETC99/DTM-8765.
10. Akao, Y, 1990, Quality Function Deployment; Integrating Customer Requirements Into Product Design, Booknews, Inc.
11. Hazelrigg, G. A., 1998, “A Framework for Decision-Based Engineering Design,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 120, No. 4, pp. 653-658.
12. Taguchi, G., and Konish, S., 1992, Taguchi Methods, Research and Development, Dearborn, Mich., ASI Press.
13. Suh, N. P., 1990, The Principles of Design, Oxford University Press, Inc.
14. Sutherland, I. E., and Hodgman, G. W., 1974, “Reentrant Polygon Clipping,” Commun. ACM, 17, No. 1, pp. 32-42.
15. Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H., 1993, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, Cambridge [England], New York, NY, Cambridge University Press.
16. Nazareth, J. L., 1987, Computer Solutions of Linear Programs, Oxford University Press.
17. Oxyczka, A., 1985, “Multicriteria Optimization for Engineering Design,” Design Optimization. Gero, J. S., Academic Press, Inc. p. 298.
18. Kunjur, A., and Krishnamurty, S., 1997, “A Robust Multicriteria Optimization Approach,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 32, No. 7, pp. 797-810.
19. Otto, K. N., and Antonsson, E. K., 1991, “Trade-off Strategies in Engineering Design,” Res. Eng. Des., 3, No. 2, pp. 87-104.
20. Chen, W., Allen, J. K., et al. 1996, “A Procedure for Robust Design: Minimizing Variance Caused by Noise Factors and Control Factors,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 118, No. 4, pp. 478-485.
21. Goodrich, M. D., and Rinderle, J. R., 1997, An Objective Approach to Design Configuration Selection, Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Sacramento, CA, DETC97/DTM-3866.