Is the EPQ Lie Scale bidimensional? Validation study of the structure of the EPQ Lie Scale among Finnish and Turkish university students

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 657-664

  Lajunen, Timo ^a   Scherler, Hanna R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Components A and B; Dual nature; EPQ Lie Scale; Finnish; Turkish

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012814483     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00163-9     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bayar, P. (1983). Atletlerin kisilik özellikleri (The personality characteristics of athletes). Unpublished Master Thesis, Ankara University.
2. Eysenck, H. J. & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
3. Eysenck, S. B. G., & Haapasalo, J. (1989). Cross-cultural comparisons of personality: Finland and England. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 121-125.
4. Ferrando, P. J., Chico, E., & Lorenzo, U. (1997). Dimensional analysis of the EPQ-R Lie Scale with a Spanish sample: gender differences and relations to N, E and P. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 631-637.
5. Francis, L. J. (1991). The dual nature of the EPQ Lie Scale among college students in England. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 1255-1260.
6. Francis, L. J., Brown, L. B., & Pearson, P. R. (1991a). The dual nature of the EPQ Lie Scale among university students in Australia. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 989-991.
7. Francis, L. J., Philipchalk, R., & Pearson, P. R. (1991b). The dual nature of the Eysenck personality questionnaire Lie Scale among college students in the U.S.A. Psychological Reports, 69, 511-514.
8. Gorsuch, R. L. (1974). Factor analysis. London: W. B. Saunders company.
9. Katz, Y. J., & Francis, L. J. (1991). The dual nature of the EPQ Lie Scale? A study among university students in Israel. Social Behaviour and Personality, 9, 217-222.
10. Loo, R. (1995). Cross-cultural validation of the dual nature of the EPQ Lie Scale with a Japanese sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 297-299.
11. Nederhof, A. J. (1985). Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 263-280.
12. Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 15, 383-388.
13. Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (Vol. 1, pp. 17-59). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
14. Paulhus, D. L., & Reid, D. B. (1991). Enhancement and denial in socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 307-317.
15. Pearson, P. R., & Francis, L. J. (1989). The dual nature of the Eysenckian Lie Scales: are religious adolescents more truthful? Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 1041-1048.
16. Wiggins, J. S. (1968). Personality structure. Annual Review of Psychology, 19, 293-350.