Dimensional analysis of the EPQ-R Lie scale with a Spanish sample: Gender differences and relations to N, E, and P

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 631-637

  Ferrando, Pere J ^a   Chico, Eliseo ^a   Lorenzo, Urbano ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031256390     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00082-2     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Aguilar, A., Tous, J. M. & Andrés, A. (1990). Adaptación y estudio psicométrico del EPQ-R. Anuario de Psicología, 46, 101-118.
2. Bernstein, I. H. & Teng, G. (1989). Factoring items and factoring scales are different: spurious evidence for multi-dimensionality due to item categorization. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 467-477.
3. Browne, M. W. (1972). Oblique rotation to a partially specified target. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 25, 207-212.
4. Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park: Sage.
5. Collins, L. M., Cliff, N., McCormick, D. J. & Zatkin, J. L. (1986). Factor recovery in binary data sets: a simulation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 21, 377-391.
6. Cowles, M., Darling, M. & Skanes, A. (1992). Some characteristics of the simulated self. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 501-510.
7. Elliot, S., Lawty-Jones, M. & Jackson, C. (1996). Effects of dissimulation on self-report and objective measures of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 335-343.
8. Eysenck, H. J. & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1976). Psychoticism as a dimension of personality. New York: Crane, Russak & Co.
9. Francis, L. J. (1991). The dual nature of the EPQ lie scale among college students in England. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 1255-1260.
10. Francis, L. J., Brown, L. B. & Pearson, P. R. (1991). The dual nature of the EPQ Lie scale among university students in Australia. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 989-991.
11. Francis, L. J., Philipchalk, R. & Pearson, P. R. (1991). The dual nature of the Eysenck personality questionnaire among college students in the U.S.A. Psychological Reports, 69, 511-514.
12. Furnham, A. (1986). Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 385-400.
13. Katz, Y. J. & Francis, L. J. (1991). The dual nature of the EPQ Lie scale?. A study among university students in Israel. Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 217-222.
14. Loo, R. (1995). Cross-cultural validation of the dual nature of the EPQ Lie scale with a Japanese sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 297-299.
15. McDonald, R. P. & Ahlawat, K. S. (1974). Difficulty factors in binary data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27, 82-99.
16. Muthen, B. (1978). Contributions to factor analysis of dichotomous variables. Psychometrika, 43, 551-560.
17. Pearson, P. R. & Francis, L. J. (1989). The dual nature of the Eysenckian lie scales: are religious adolescents more truthful? Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 1041-1048.