A Sequential Approach for Identifying Lead Compounds in Large Chemical Databases

Statistical Science

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 154-168

  Abt, Markus ^a   Lim, Yongbin ^b   Sacks, Jerome ^c   Xie, Minge ^d   Young, S Stanley ^e  

^a Natl Inst of Statistical Sciences   (Switzerland)

^b Ewha Womans University   (South Korea)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^d RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Combinatorial chemistry; Data mining; High throughput screening; Recursive partitioning; Sequential design; Structure activity relationship

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012319917     PISSN: 08834237     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1214/ss/1009213288     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Box, G. E. P. and DRAPER, N. R. (1987). Empirical Model-building and Response Surfaces. Wiley, New York.
2. BREIMAN, L., FRIEDMAN, J. H., OLSHEN, R. A. and STONE, C. J. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
3. BURBAUM, J. J. (1998). Miniaturization technologies in HTS: How fast, how small, how soon? Drug Discov. Today 3 313-322.
4. BURDEN, F. R. (1989). Molecular identification number for substructure searches. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 29 225-227.
5. CARHART, R. E., SMITH, D. H. and VENKATARAGHAVAN, R. (1985). Atom pairs as molecular features in structure-activity studies: definition and applications. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 25 64-73.
6. CHO, S. J., SHEN, C. F. and HERMSMEIER, M. A. (2000). Binary formal inference-based recursive modeling using multiple atom and physiochemical property class pair and torsion descriptors as decision criteria. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 40 668-680.
7. CORTESE, R. (ed.) (1996). Combinatorial Libraries. Synthesis, Screening and Application Potential. de Gruyter, Berlin.
8. FINN, P. W. (1996). Computer-based screening of compound databases for the identification of novel leads. Drug Discov. Today 1 363-370.
9. FRIEDMAN, J. H. and FISHER, N. I. (1999). Bump hunting in high-dimensional data. Statist. Comput. 9 123-143 (with discussion).
10. GOBBI, A., POPPINGER, D. and ROHDE, B. (1997). Finding biological active compounds in large databases. Available at http://www.unibasel.ch/mdpi/ecsoc/f0008/f0008.htm.
11. GUNDERTOFTE, K. and JØRGENSEN, F. S. (eds.) (2000). Molecular modeling and prediction of bioactivity. In Proceedings of the Twelfth European Symposium on Quantitative Structure Activity Relationships. Plenum, New York.
12. HAALAND, P. D., MCMILLAN, N. J., NYCHKA, D. W. and WELCH, W. J. (1994). Analysis of space filling designs. Comput. Sci. Statist. 26 111-120.
13. HAWKINS, D. M. (1994). FIRM formal inference-based recursive modeling. Release 2, Univ. Minnesota, St. Paul.
14. HAWKINS, D. M. and KASS, G. V. (1982). Automatic interaction detection. In Topics in Applied Multivariate Analysis (D. M. Hawkins, ed.) 269-302. Cambridge Univ. Press.
15. HELLAND, I. S. (1990). Partial least squares regression and statistical models. Scand. J. Statist. 17 97-114.
16. JACCARD P (1908). Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bull. Soc. Vaud. Sci. Nat. 44 223-270.
17. JOHNSON, M. E., MOORE, L. M. and YLVISAKER, D. (1990). Minimax and maximin distance designs. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 26 131-148.
18. JONES-HERTZOG, D. K., MUKHOPADHYAY, P., KEEFER, C. E. and YOUNG, S. S. (2000). Use of recursive partitioning in the sequential screening of G-protein-coupled receptors. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 10 207-215.
19. KAUFFMAN, G. W. and JURS, P. C. (2000). Prediction of inhibition of the sodium ion-proton antiporter by benzoylguanidine derivatives from molecular structure. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 40 753-761.
20. KAUFMAN, L. and ROUSSEEUW, P. J. (1990). Finding Groups in Data. Wiley Interscience, New York.
21. PATANKAR, S. J. and JURS, P. C. (2000). Prediction of IC50 values for ACAT inhibitors from molecular structure. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 40 706-723.
22. RUSINKO, A. III, FARMEN, M. W., LAMBERT, C. G., BROWN, P. L. and YOUNG, S. S. (1999). Analysis of a large structure/biological activity data set using recursive partitioning. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 39 1017-1026.
23. SERVICE, R. F. (1996). Combinatorial chemistry hits the drug market. Science 272 1266-1268.
24. TATSUOKA, K., GU, C., SACKS, J. and YOUNG, S. S. (2000). Predicting extreme values in large data sets. J. Comput. Graph. Statist. Unpublished manuscript.
25. VAN DRIE, J. H. and LAJINESS, M. S. (1998). Approaches to virtual library design. Drug Discov. Today 3 274-283.
26. VISWANADHAN, V. N., MUELLER, G. A., BASAK, S. C. and WEINSTEIN, J. N. (1996). A new QSAR algorithm combining principal component analysis with a neural network: application to calcium channel antagonists. Available at http://org.chem.msu.su/people/baskin/neurchem.html.
27. WALTERS, W. P., STAHL, M. T. and MURKO, M. A. (1998). Virtual screening: an overview. Drug Discov. Today 3 160-178.
28. WESTFALL, P. H. and YOUNG, S. S. (1993). Resampling-based multiple testing: examples and methods for p-value adjustment. Wiley, New York.
29. YOUNG, S. S., FARMEN, M. W. and RUSINKO, A. III (1996). Random versus rational: which is better for general compound screening? Network Science. Available at http://www. netsci.org/Science/Screening/feature09.html.