On some numerical dissipation schemes

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 147, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 518-544

  Swanson, R C ^a   Radespiel, R ^b   Turkel, E ^c,d  

^a NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b GERMAN AEROSPACE CENTER DLR   (Germany)

^c TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^d ICASE   (Israel)

Author keywords

Euler; Navier Stokes; Numerical dissipation

Indexed keywords

FINITE VOLUME METHOD; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; SHOCK WAVES;

AND SPLITS; ARTIFICIAL DISSIPATION; CENTRAL DIFFERENCE APPROXIMATIONS; EULER; INTERIOR POINT; MATRIX DISSIPATIONS; NAVIER STOKES; NAVIER-STOKES EQUATION; NUMERICAL DISSIPATION; SHOCK-WAVES;

HYPERSONIC FLOW;

EID: 0012210223     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1998.6100     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. S. Allmaras, Contamination of laminar boundary layers by artificial dissipation in Navier-Stokes solutions, Proceedings, Conference on Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics, Reading, England, UK, April 1992.
2. P. H. Cook, M. A. McDonald, M. C. P. Firmin, AERFOIL RAE 2822 pressure distributions, and boundary layer and wake measurements, 1979.
3. Harten A. High resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 49:1983;357.
4. A. Jameson, W. Schmidt, E. Turkel, Numerical solutions of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge-Kutta time-stepping schemes, 1981.
5. A. Jameson, Artificial diffusion, upwind biasing, limiters and their effect on accuracy and multigrid convergence in transonic and hypersonic flow, 1993.
6. Jameson A. Analysis and design of numerical schemes for gas dynamics I: Artificial diffusion, upwind biasing, limiters and their effect on accuracy and multigrid convergence. Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 4:1995;171.
7. Jameson A. Analysis and design of numerical schemes for gas dynamics II: Artificial diffusion and discrete shock structure. Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 5:1995;1.
8. Jameson A. Positive schemes and shock modelling for compressible flows. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 20:1995;743.
9. Jorgenson P., Turkel E. Central difference TVD schemes for time dependent and steady state problems. J. Comput. Phys. 107:1993;297.
10. Liou M.-S., Steffen C. J. A new flux splitting scheme. J. Comput. Phys. 107:1993;23.
11. Liou M.-S. A sequel to AUSM: AUSM+. J. Comput. Phys. 129:1996;364.
12. Liou M.-S., Wada Y. A quest towards ultimate numerical flux schemes. CFD Review. 1995;251.
13. L. Martinelli, A. Jameson, Validation of a multigrid method for the Reynolds averaged equations, 1988.
14. Pulliam T. H. Artificial dissipation for the Euler equations. AIAA J. 24:1986;1931.
15. Quirk J. J. A contribution to the great Riemann solver debate. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids. 18:1994;555.
16. Radespiel R., Longo J. M. A., Bruck S., Schwamborn D. Efficient Numerical Simulation of Complex 3D Flows with Large Contrast, AGARD-CP-578. 1996.
17. Radespiel R., Kroll N. Accurate flux vector splitting for shocks and shear layers. J. Comput. Phys. 121:1995;66.
18. Radespiel R., Swanson R. C. Progress with multigrid schemes for hypersonic flow problems. J. Comput. Phys. 116:1995;103.
19. Roe P. L. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors and difference schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 43:1981;357.
20. Schlichting H. Boundary Layer Theory. 1979.
21. R. C. Swanson, E. Turkel, Artificial dissipation and central difference schemes for the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations, AIAA 8th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, AIAA, 1987, 55.
22. Swanson R. C., Turkel E. On central difference and upwind schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 101:1992;292.
23. Swanson R. C., Turkel E., White J. A. An effective multigrid method for high-speed flows. Comm. Appl. Numer. Methods. 8:1992;671.
24. R. C. Swanson, E. Turkel, Aspects of a high-resolution scheme for the Navier-Stokes equations, AIAA 11th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, 1993, 805.
25. R. C. Swanson, R. Radespiel, E. Turkel, Comparison of several dissipation algorithms for central difference schemes, AIAA 13th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, 1997, 580.
26. Tadmor E. Convenient total variation diminishing conditions for nonlinear difference schemes. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 25:1988;1002.
27. S. Tatsumi, L. Martinelli, A. Jameson, A design, implementation and validation of flux limited schemes for the solution of the compressible Navier-Stokes equations, 1994.
28. S. Tatsumi, L. Martinelli, A. Jameson, A new high resolution scheme for compressible viscous flow with shocks, 1995.
29. Tatsumi S., Martinelli L., Jameson A. Flux-limited schemes for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations. AIAA J. 33:1995;252.
30. Turkel E. A review of preconditioning methods for fluid dynamics. Appl. Numer. Math. 12:1993;257.
31. Turkel E., Radespiel R., Kroll N. Assessment of two preconditioning methods for aerodynamic problems. Comput. & Fluids. 26:1997;613.
32. E. Turkel, V. N. Vatsa, R. Radespiel, Preconditioning methods for low speed flow, 14th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 1996, 650.
33. D. L. Tweedt, R. V. Chima, E. Turkel, Preconditioning for numerical simulation of low Mach number three-dimensional viscous turbomachinery flows, 1997.
34. B. van Leer, Flux vector splitting for the Euler equations, Eighth Int. Confer. on Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics, 1982, Krause, 170, Springer-Verlag, New York/Berlin, 1982, 507.
35. Wada Y., Liou M.-S. An accurate and robust flux splitting scheme for shock and contact discontinuities. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 18:1997.