Assessment of preconditioning methods for multidimensional aerodynamics

Computers and Fluids

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 613-634

  Turkel, E ^a,b   Radespiel, R ^c   Kroll, N ^c  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^c GERMAN AEROSPACE CENTER DLR   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; ALGORITHMS; CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS;

ARTIFICIAL DISSIPATION TERMS; MACH NUMBERS; STEADY STATE EQUATIONS;

COMPRESSIBLE FLOW;

AERODYNAMICS; COMPRESSIBLE FLUID; CONDITIONER; FLOW;

EID: 0031184629     PISSN: 00457930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0045-7930(97)00013-3     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Turkel, E., Preconditioned methods for solving the incompressible and low speed compressible equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 1987, 72, 277-298.
2. Turkel, E., Fiterman, A. and van Leer, B., Preconditioning and the limit to the incompressible flow equations. In Computing the Future: Frontiers of Computational Fluid Dynamics 1994, eds D. A. Caughey and M. M. Hafez. Wiley, New York, 1994, pp. 215-234.
3. Turkel, E., A review of preconditioning methods for fluid dynamics. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 1993, 12, 257-284.
4. Choi, Y.-H. and Merkle, C. L., The application of preconditioning to viscous flows. Journal of Computational Physics, 1993, 105, 207-223.
5. Dailey, L. D. and Pletcher, R. H., Evaluation of multigrid acceleration for preconditioned time-accurate Navier-Stokes algorithms. Computers and Fluids, 1996, 25, 791-811.
6. van Leer, B., Lee, W. T. and Roe, P. L., Characteristic time-stepping or local preconditioning of the Euler equations. AIAA Paper, 1991, 91-1552.
7. Merkle, C. L., Preconditioning methods for viscous flow calculations. In Computational Fluid Dynamics Review 1995, eds M. Hafez and K. Oshima. Wiley, Chichester, U.K., 1995, pp. 419-436.
8. Darmofal, D. L. and Schmid, P. J., The importance of eigenvectors for local preconditioners of the Euler equations. In Proceedings of 12th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, 1995, pp. 102-117.
9. van Leer, B., Mesaros, L., Tai, C-H. and Turkel, E., Local preconditioning in a stagnation point. In Proceedings of the 12th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, 1995, pp. 88-101.
10. Guillard, H. and Viozat, C., On the behavior of upwind schemes in the low Mach number limit. Computers and Fluids (to appear).
11. Fiterman, A., Turkel, E. and Vatsa, V. N., Pressure updating methods for the steady-state fluid equations. In Proceedings of 12th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, 1995, pp. 68-76.
12. Jameson, A., Schmidt, W. and Turkel, E., Numerical solutions of the Euler equations by a finite volume method using Runge-Kutta time-stepping schemes. AIAA Paper, 1981, 81-1259.
13. Roe, P. L., Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors and difference schemes. Journal of Computational Physics, 1981, 43, 357-372.
14. Godfrey, A. G., Walters, R. W. and van Leer, B., Preconditioning for the Navier-Stokes equations with finite-rate chemistry. AIAA Paper, 1993, 93-0535.
15. Volpe, G., Performance of compressible flow codes at low Mach numbers. AIAA Journal, 1993, 31, 49-56.
16. Allmaras, S., Analysis of semi-implicit preconditioners for multigrid solution of the 2-D compressible Navier-Stokes equations. In Proceedings of 12th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, 1995, pp. 52-67.
17. Godfrey, A. G., Steps toward a robust preconditioning. AIAA Paper, 1994, 94-0520.
18. Radespiel, R., Rossow, C.-C. and Swanson, R. C., An efficient cell-vertex multigrid scheme for the three dimensional Navier-Stokes equations. AIAA Journal, 1990, 28, 1464-1472.
19. Swanson, R. C. and Turkel, E., Artificial dissipation and central difference schemes for the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations. In Proceedings of AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, AIAA Paper, 1987, 87-1107-CP.
20. Beran, P., Steady and unsteady solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations for flows about airfoils at low speeds. AIAA Paper, 1991, 91-1733.
21. Rhie, C. M. and Chow, W. L., Numerical study of the turbulent flow past an airfoil with trailing edge separation. AIAA Journal, 1983, 21, 1525-1532.
22. Gregory, N. and O'Reilly, C. L., Low speed aerodynamic characteristics of NACA 0012 airfoil section, including the effects of upper surface roughness simulation hoarfrost. Aero Report 1308, National Physics Laboratory, Teddington, U.K., 1970.
23. Swanson, R. C. and Radespiel, R., Cell centered and cell vertex multigrid schemes for the Navier-Stokes equations. AIAA Journal, 1991, 29, 697-703.
24. Turkel, E., Vatsa, V. N. and Radespiel, R., Preconditioning methods for low speed flow. In Proceedings cf the 14th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, AIAA Paper, 1996, 96-2460.
25. Kroll, N., Radespiel, R. and Rossow, C.-C., Accurate and efficient flow solvers for 3D applications on structured meshes. VKI Lecture Series, Vol. LS-04, 1994.
26. Viozat, C., Implicit upwind schemes for low Mach number compressible flows. INRIA report, 3084, 1997.
27. Mavriplis, D., Multigrid strategies for viscous flow solvers on anisotropic unstructured meshes. AIAA Paper, 1997, 97-1952.
28. Jespersen, D., Pulliam, T. and Buning, P., Recent enhancements to OVERFLOW. AIAA Paper, 1997, 97-0644.
29. Drela, M., XFOIL: An analysis and design system for low Reynolds number airfoils. In Proceedings of Conference on Low Reynolds Number Aerodynamics, ed. T. J. Mueller, Springer-Verlag, Notre Dame, IN, 1989.
30. Radespiel, R. and Turkel, E., Preconditioning methods for multidimensional aerodynamics. In 27th CFD Lecture Series, Vol. VKI-LS1996-06, von Karman Institute, 1996.