Culture wars in the classroom: Prospective teachers question science

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 37, Issue 9, 2000, Pages 895-915

  Sullenger, Karen ^a   Turner, Steve ^a   Caplan, Hart ^a   Crummey, Joe ^a   Cuming, Rick ^a   Charron, Cynthia ^a   Corey, Beth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012159619     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<895::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-3     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R., & Lederman, N.G. (1997). The nature of science and instructional practices: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417-436.
2. Bird, T. (1992). After you, no after you: A collision between two programs in getting through TE 101. In S. Feinman-Nemser & H. Featherstone (Eds.), Exploring teaching: Reinventing an introductory course. New York: Teachers College Press.
3. Brickhouse, N.W. (1990). Teachers' beliefs about the nature of science and their relationships to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(1), 53-62.
4. Chalmers, A.F. (1976). What is this thing called science? St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press.
5. Clandinin, D.J. & Connelly, F.M. (1994). Personal experience methods. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oakes: Sage Publications.
6. Collins, H., & Pinch, T. (1993). The Golum: What everyone should know about science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Connelly, M., & Clandinin, D.J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2-14.
8. Driver, R. (1983). The pupil as scientist. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
9. Driver, R., Asko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12.
10. Duschl, R.A. (1990). Restructuring science education: The importance of theories and their development. New York: Teachers College Press.
11. Eisner, E.W. (1991). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York: MacMillan Publishing, Co.
12. Fleury, S., & Bentley, M. (1991). Educating elementary science teachers: Alternative conceptions of the nature of science. Teaching Education, 3(2), 57-67.
13. Gallagher, J.J. (1991). Prospective and practicing secondary school science teachers' knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science. Science Education, 75(1), 121-133.
14. Ginns, I.S., & Watters, J.J. (1995). An analysis of scientific understanding of preservice elementary teacher education students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(2), 205-222.
15. Goodson, I. (1996). Representing teachers: Bringing teachers back in. In M. Kompf, D. Dworet, & Boak (Eds.), Changing research and practice: Teachers' professionalism, identities, and knowledge. London: Falmer Press.
16. Gross, P.R., & Levitt, N. (1994). Higher superstition: The academic left and its quarrels with science. Baltimore: John's Hopkins University Press.
17. Hess, D.J. (1997). Science studies. An advanced introduction. New York: New York University Press.
18. House, E.R., Mathison, S., & McTaggert, R. (1989). Validity and teacher inference. Educational Researcher, 18(7), 11-15, 26.
19. King, B.B. (1991). Beginning teachers' knowledge of and attitudes toward history and philosophy of science. Science Education, 75(1), 135-141.
20. Kruger, C. (1990). A survey of primary school teachers conceptions of force and motion. Educational Researcher, 32(2), 83-85.
21. Kuklick, H. (1995). Mind over matter? Historical studies in the philosophy of science. 25.2: 361-378.
22. Lakin, S., & Wellington, J. (1994). Who will teach the 'nature of science'?: Teachers' views of science and their implications for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 16(2), 175-190.
23. Lantz, O., & Kass, H. (1987). Chemistry teachers functional paradigms. Science Education, 71(1), 117-134.
24. Latour, B. (1992). One more turn after the social Turn… In The social dimensions of science, Ernan McMullin (Ed.), South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 272-294.
25. Lederman, N.G., & Zeidler, D.L. (1987). Science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: Do they really influence teaching behavior? Science Education, 71(5), 721-734.
26. Mathews, M. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.
27. McComas, W. (1998). Nature of science: Strategies and rationales. London: Kluwater Press.
28. McDiarmid, G.W., & Ball, D. (1987). Tracking teacher learning. National Center for Research on Teacher Education. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
29. Mellado, V. (1997). Preservice teachers' classroom practice and their conceptions of the nature of science. Science and Education, 6(4), 331-354.
30. Paine, L. (1990). Orientation towards diversity: What do prospective teachers bring? Research Report National Center for Research on Teaching, East Lansing, MI.
31. Palmquist, B.C., & Finley, F.N. (1997). Preservice teachers' views of the nature of science during post baccalaureate science teaching program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(6), 595-615.
32. Pomeroy, D. (1993). Implications of teachers' beliefs about the nature of science: Comparison of the beliefs of scientists, secondary science teachers, and elementary teachers. Science Education, 77(3), 261-278.
33. Randall, W. (1995). The stories we are: An essay on self creation. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
34. Reason, P. (1988). Human inquiry in action: Developments in new paradigm research. Sage Publications.
35. Richardson, V. (1990). Significant and worthwhile change in teaching practice. Educational Researcher 19(7), 10-18.
36. Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
37. Roth, P. et al. (1990). Symposium on Deconstructing Quarks. Social Studies of Science, 20(4).
38. Rowell, J.A., & Cawthorn, E.R. (1982). Images of science: an empirical study. European Journal of Science Education, 4(1), 79-94.
39. Shulman, L.S. (1988). Disciplines of inquiry in education: An overview. In R.M. Jaeger (Ed.), Complementary methods for research in education, Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association.
40. Shulman, L.S. (1991). Ways of seeing, ways of knowing: Ways of teaching, ways of learning about teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 23(5), 393-395.
41. Sokol, A.D. (1996). Transgressing the boundaries: Towards a transformative hermeneutics of quantum gravity. Social Text, 46 (3), 217-252.
42. Spiro, R.J. (1987). Knowledge acquisition for application: Cognitive flexibility and transfer in complex content domains. Eric Clearinghouse Document Number: ED287155.
43. Spiro, R.J. (1994). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In R. Spiro, R. Coulson, P. Feltovich, & D. Anderson (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
44. Stinner, A. (1989). Science, humanities, and society - The Snow-Leavis controversy. Interchange, 20(2), 16-23.
45. Sullenger, K.S., & Turner, R.S. (1998). Nature of science: Implications for education: An undergraduate course for prospective teachers. In Wm. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
46. Toffler, A. (1986). The third wave. In A.H. Teich (Ed.), Technology and the future (4th ed.). New York: St. Martin's Press.
47. Turner, R.S., & Sullenger, K.S. (1999). Kuhn in the classroom, Lakatos in the lab: Science educators confront the nature-of-science debate. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 24(1), 5-30.
48. Weinberg, A.M. (1986). Can technology replace social engineering? In A.H. Teich (Ed.), Technology and the future (4th ed.). New York: St. Martin's Press.