The archaeology of symbols

Annual Review of Anthropology

Volumn 27, Issue , 1998, Pages 329-346

  Robb, John E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Agency; Knowledge; Prehistory; Semantics; Social theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 0011714823     PISSN: 00846570     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.329     Document Type: Article

References (147)

1. Bacus EA, Barker AW, Bonevich JD, Dunavan SL, Fitzhugh JB, et al, eds. 1992. A Gendered Past: A Critical Bibliography of Gender in Archaeology. Ann Arbor: Mus. Anthropol., Univ. Mich.
2. Baker M. 1997. Invisibility as a symptom of gender categories in archaeology. See Moore & Scott 1997, pp. 183-91
3. Barrett J. 1994, Fragments from Antiquity: An Archaeology of Social Life in Britain, 2900-1200 BC. Oxford, UK: Blackwell
4. Barth F. 1987. Cosmologies in the Making: A Generative Approach to Cultural Variation in Inner New Guinea. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
5. Beck LA, ed, 1995. Regional Perspectives in Mortuary Analysis. New York: Plenum
6. Binford L. 1962. Archaeology as anthropology. Am. Antiq. 28:217-25
7. Binford L. 1972. Mortuary practices: their study and their potential. Am. Antiq. 36: 6-29
8. Blanton RE, Feinman GM, Kowalewski SA, Peregrine PN. 1996. A dual-processual theory for the evolution of Mesoamerican civilization. Curr. Anthropol. 37:1-14
9. Blitz JH. 1993. Big pot for bit shots: feasting and storage in a Mississippian community. Am. Antiq. 58:-96
10. Bloch M, Parry J, eds. 1982. Death and the Regeneration of Life. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
11. Bourdieu P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
12. Bradley R. 1989. Deaths and entrances: a contextual analysis of megalithic art. Curr. Anthropol. 30:68-75
13. Bradley R. 1991, Ritual, time and history. World Archaeol. 23:209-19
14. Broodbank C. 1993. Ulysses without sails: trade, distance, power, and knowledge in the early Cyclades. World Archaeol. 24: 315-31
15. Brown JA. 1981. The search for rank in prehistoric burials. See Chapman et al 1981, pp. 25-38
16. Brown JA. 1995. On mortuary analysis - with special reference to the Saxe-Binford research program. See Beck 1995, pp. 3-26
17. Brumfiel EM. 1992. Distinguished lecture in archaeology: breaking and entering the ecosystem - gender, class and faction steal the show. Am. Anthropol. 94:551-67
18. Brumfiel EM. 1996a. Commentary. Curr. Anthropol. 37:48-50
19. Brumfiel EM. 1996b. Figurines and the Aztec state: testing the effectiveness of ideological domination. In Gender and Archaeology, ed. R Wright, pp. 143-66. Pittsburgh, PA: Univ. Pittsburgh Press
20. Brumfiel EM, Earle T, eds. 1987. Specialization, Exchange and Complex Societies, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
21. Carr C, Neitzel J, eds, 1995. Style, Society, and Person. New York: Plenum
22. Chapman RW. 1981. The emergence of formal disposal areas and the 'problem' of megalithic tombs in prehistoric Europe. See Chapman et al 1981, pp. 71-81
23. Chapman RW, Kinnes I, Randsborg K, eds. 1981. The Archaeology of Death. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
24. Chippindale C. 1992. Grammars of archaeological design: a generative and geometrical approach to the form of artifacts. In Representations in Archaeology, ed. J-C Gardin, C Peebles, pp. 251-75. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press
25. Claassen C, ed. 1992. Exploring Gender Through Archaeology: Selected Papers from the 1991 Boone Conference. Madison. WI: Prehistory Press
26. Claassen C, Joyce RA, eds. 1997. Women in Prehistory. Philadelphia: Univ. Penn. Press
27. Clark J. 1996. Commentary. Curr. Anthropol. 37:51-52
28. Clark J, Blake M. 1994. The power of prestige: competitive generosity and the emergence of rank societies in lowland Mesoamerica. in Factional Competition and Political Development in the New World, ed. E Brumfiel, J Fox, pp. 17-30. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
29. Clottes J. 1996. Thematic changes in Upper Palaeolithic art: a view from the Grotte Chauvet. Antiquity 70:276-88
30. Cohen M, Bennett S. 1993. Skeletal evidence for sex roles and gender hierarchies in prehistory. In Sex and Gender Hierarchies, ed. B Miller, pp. 273-94. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
31. Conkey M. 1982, Boundedness in art and society. See Hodder 1982b, pp. 115-28
32. Conkey M. 1985. Ritual communication, social elaboration, and the variable trajectories of Paleolithic material culture. In Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherers: The Emergence of Cultural Complexity, ed. TD Price, J Brown, pp. 299-323. New York: Academic
33. Conkey M, Gero J, 1997. Programme to practice: gender and feminism in archaeology. Annu, Rev. Anthropol. 26:411-37
34. Conkey M, Spector J. 1984. The archaeology of gender. Adv. Archaeol. Methods Theory 7:1-38
35. Conrad G, Demarest AA. 1984. Religion and Empire: The Dynamics of Aztec and Inca Expansionism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
36. Cowgill G. 1996. Commentary. Curr. Anthropol. 37:52-53
37. Criado F. 1996. Commentary. Curr. Anthropol. 37:53-55
38. D'Altroy T. 1996. Commentary. Curr Anthropol. 37:55-56
39. Deetz J. 1977. In Small Things Forgotten: The Archaeology of Early American Life. Garden City. NY: Doubleday
40. DeMarrais E, Castillo LJ, Earle TK. 1996. Ideology, materialization, and power strategies. Curr. Anthropol. 37:15-31
41. de Saussure F. 1972. Course in General Linguistics. London: Gerald Duckworth
42. Dobres M-A. 1995. Gender and prehistoric technology: on the social agency of technical strategies. World Archaeol. 21:25-49
43. Dobres M-A, Hoffman C. 1994. Social agency and the dynamics of prehistoric technology. J. Archaeol. Methods Theory 1: 211-58
44. Dowson TA. 1994. Reading art, writing history: rock art and social change in southern Africa. World Archaeol. 25:332-44
45. Ehrenberg M. 1989. Women in Prehistory. Norman: Univ. Okla. Press
46. Emberling G. 1997. Ethnicity in complex societies: archaeological perspectives. J. Archaeol. Res. 5:295-344
47. Ericsson J, Earle T, eds. 1977. Exchange Systems in Prehistory. New York: Academic
48. Farr SE. 1993. Gender and ethnogenesis in the early colonial Lesser Antilles. Presented at Congr. Int. Assoc. Caribbean Archaeol., 15th, San Juan, Puerto Rico
49. Flannery K, Marcus J. 1993. Cognitive archaeology. Cambridge Archaeol. J. 3:260-70
50. Fleming A. 1973. Tombs for the living. Man 8:177-93
51. Friedrich MH. 1970. Design structure and social interaction: archaeological implications of an ethnographic analysis. Am Antiq. 35:332-43
52. Gamble C. 1982. Interaction and alliance in Palaeolithic society. Man 17:92-107
53. Gebauer A, Price TD. 1991. Transitions to Agriculture in Prehistory. Madison, WI: Prehistory Press
54. Geertz C. 1980. Negara: The Theatre State in Nineteenth-Century Bali. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
55. Gero J. 1997. Agency and gender - a tension. Presented at Annu. Meet. Soc. Am. Archaeol., 62nd, Nashville, Tenn.
56. Gero J, Conkey M, eds. 1991. Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory. London: Blackwell
57. Giddens A. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley: Univ Calif. Press
58. Glassie H. 1975. Folk Housing in Middle Virginia: A Structural Analysis of Historic Artifacts. Knoxville: Univ. Tenn. Press
59. Gnoli G, Vernant J-P, eds. 1982. La mort, les morts dan les sociétés anciennes. Cambridge/Paris: Cambridge Univ. Press/Editions Maison Sci. l'Homme
60. Godelier M. 1982. Social hierarchies among the Baruya of New Guinea. In Inequality in New Guinea Highlands Societies, ed. A Strathern, pp. 3-34. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
61. Gosden C. 1994. Social Being and Time. London: Blackwell
62. Hatch E. 1989. Theories of social honor. Am Anthropol. 91:341-53
63. Hawkes C. 1954. Archaeological method and theory: some suggestions from the Old World. Am. Anthropol. 56:155-68
64. Hayden B. 1990. Nimrods, piscatores, pluckers, and planters: the emergence of food production. J Anthropol. Archaeol. 9: 31-69
65. Hayden B. 1995. Pathways to power: principles for creating socioeconomic inequalities. See Price & Feinman 1995, pp. 15-86
66. Hayden B, Gargett R. 1990. Big man, big heart? A Mesoamerican view of the emergence of complex society. Anc. Mesoam 1:3-20
67. Helms MW. 1993. Craft and the Kingly Ideal. Austin: Univ. Texas Press
68. Hendon J. 1999. Multiple sources of prestige and the social evaluation of women in prehispanic Mesoamerica. In Material Symbols: Culture and Economy in Prehistory, ed. J Robb. Carbondale: Cent. Archaeol. Invest., South. Ill. Univ. In press
69. Herbert EW. 1994. Iron, Gender, and Power: Rituals of Transformation in African Societies. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press
70. Hodder I. 1982a. Sequences of structural change in the Dutch Neolithic. See Hodder 1982b, pp. 162-77
71. Hodder I, ed. 1982b. Symbolic and Structural Archaeology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
72. Hodder I. 1990. The Domestication of Europe. London: Blackwell
73. Hodder I. 1996. Commentary. Curr. Anthropol. 37:57-59
74. Hodder I, Shanks M, Alexandri A, Buchli V, Carman J, et al, eds. 1995. Interpreting Archaeology: Finding Meaning in the Past. London: Routledge
75. Hosler D. 1994. The Sounds and Colors of Power: The Sacred Metallurgical Tradition of Ancient West Mexico. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
76. Huntington R, Metcalf P. 1991. Celebrations of Death: The Anthropology of Mortuary Ritual. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. 2nd ed.
77. Jochim M. 1983. Paleolithic cave art in ecological perspective. In Hunter-Gatherer Economy in Perspective, ed. GN Bailey, pp. 212-19. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
78. Jones S. 1997. The Archaeology of Ethnicity: Constructing Identities in the Past and Present. London: Routledge
79. Joyce A, Winter M. 1996. Ideology, power and urban society in prehispanic Oaxaca. Curr. Anthropol. 37:33-47
80. Kelly R. 1993. Constructing Inequality: The Fabrication of a Hierarchy of Virtue Among the Etoro. Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich Press
81. Kertzer D. 1988. Ritual, Politics, and Power. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
82. Kus S. 1982. Matters material and ideal. See Hodder 1982b, pp. 47-62
83. Lakoff G, Johnson M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
84. Lechtman H. 1984. Andean value systems and the development of prehistoric metallurgy Technol. Culture 25:1-36
85. Lemonnier P. 1992. Elements for An Anthropology of Technology. Ann Arbor: Mus. Anthropol., Univ. Mich.
86. Leone M. 1984. Interpreting ideology in historical archaeology: using the rules of perspective in the William Paca Garden in Annapolis, Maryland. See Miller & Tilley 1984, pp. 25-35
87. Leroi-Gourhan A. 1982. The Dawn of European Art. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
88. Lewis-Williams JD, Dowson TA. 1993. On vision and power in the Neolithic: evidence from the decorated monuments. Curr. Anthropol. 34:55-65
89. Lindly J, Clark G. 1990. Symbolism and modern human origins. Curr. Anthropol. 31: 233-61
90. Mann M. 1986. The Sources of Social Power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
91. Marcus J, Flannery KV. 1996. Zapotec Civilization: How Urban Society Evolved in Mexico's Oaxaca Valley. London: Thames & Hudson
92. Marshack A. 1972. Cognitive aspects of Upper Paleolithic engraving. Curr. Anthropol. 13:455-77
93. McGuire RH. 1992. A Marxist Archaeology. San Diego, CA: Academic
94. McGuire RH, Saitta DJ. 1996. Although they have petty captains, they obey them badly: the dialectics of prehispanic Western Pueblo social organization. Am. Antiq. 61: 197-216
95. Meillassoux C. 1981. Maidens, Meal and Money. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
96. Miller D, Tilley C, eds. 1984. Ideology, Power and Prehistory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
97. Mithen SJ. 1990. Thoughtful Foragers: A Study of Prehistoric Decision Making. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
98. Moore J, Scott E, eds. 1997. Invisible People and Processes: Writing Gender and Childhood into European Prehistory. Leicester, UK: Leicester Univ. Press
99. Nelson SM. 1997. Gender in Archaeology: Analyzing Power and Prestige. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira
100. Nordbladh J, Yates T. 1990. This perfect body, this virgin text: between sex and gender in archaeology. In Archaeology After Structuralism: Post-Structuralism and the Practice of Archaeology, ed. I Bapty, T Yates, pp. 222-37. London: Routledge
101. Ortner S. 1972. On key symbols. Am. Anthropol. 75:1338-46
102. Ortner S. 1984. Theory in anthropology since the sixties. Camp. Stud. Soc. Hist. 1: 126-66
103. Ortner S. 1990. Gender hegemonies. Cult. Crit. 14:35-80
104. O'Shea JM. 1984. Mortuary Variability. New York: Academic
105. O'Shea JM. 1992. Review of "The Domestication of Europe." Am. Anthropol. 94: 752-53
106. Parker Pearson M. 1982. Mortuary practices, society and ideology: an ethnoarchaeological study. See Hodder 1982b, pp. 99-113
107. Parker Pearson M, Richards C, eds. 1994. Architecture and Order: Approaches to Social Space. London: Routledge
108. Patton M. 1993. Statements in Stone: Monuments and Society in Neolithic Brittany. London: Routledge
109. Pauketat TR, Emerson TE. 1991. The ideology of authority and the power of the pot. Am. Anthropol. 93:919-41
110. Price TD, Feinman G. 1995. Foundations of Social Inequality. New York: Plenum
111. Rappaport R. 1979. Ecology, Meaning and Religion. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic
112. Renfrew C. 1976. Megaliths, territories and populations. In Acculturation and Continuity in Atlantic Europe, ed. S De Laet, pp. 198-220. Brugge: De Tempel
113. Renfrew C. 1979. Before Civilization. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
114. Renfrew C, Zubrow E. 1994. The Ancient Mind: Elements of Cognitive Archaeology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
115. Rice PC. 1981. Prehistoric Venuses: symbols of motherhood or womanhood? J. Anthropol Res. 37:402-14
116. Richards C. 1993. Monumental choreography: architecture and spatial representation in Late Neolithic Orkney. See Tilley 1993, pp.143-80
117. Roe PG. 1995. Style, society, myth, and structure. See Carr & Neitzel 1995, pp. 27-76
118. Sahlins M. 1985. Islands of History. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press
119. Saxe AA. 1970. Social dimensions of mortuary practices. PhD thesis, Univ. Mich., Ann Arbor
120. Schlanger N. 1994. Mindful technology: unleashing the chaine operatoire of the mind. See Renfrew & Zubrow 1994, pp. 143-51
121. Schortman E, Urban P, Ausec M. 1996. Commentary. Curr. Anthropol. 37:61-63
122. Shanks M, McGuire RH. 1996. The craft of archaeology. Am. Antiq. 61:75-88
123. Shanks M, Tilley C. 1982. Ideology, symbolic power and ritual communication: a reinterpretation of neolithic mortuary practices. See Hodder 1982b, pp. 129-54
124. Shanks M, Tilley C. 1988. Social Theory and Archaeology. Albuquerque: Univ. NM Press
125. Shennan S. 1982. Ideology, change and the European Bronze Age. See Hodder 1982b, pp. 155-61
126. Shennan S, ed. 1989. Archaeological Approaches to Cultural Identity. London: Routledge
127. Sherratt A. 1990. The genesis of megaliths: monumentality, ethnicity and social complexity in Neolithic north-west Europe. World Archaeol. 22:147-67
128. Sinclair A. 1995. The technique as symbol in Late Glacial Europe. World Archaeol 27: 50-62
129. Spencer-Wood SM. 1991. Toward a feminist historical archaeology of the construction of gender. See Walde & Willows 1991, pp. 234-44
130. Thomas J. 1991. Rethinking the Neolithic. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press
131. Thomas J. 1996. Time, Culture and Identity. London: Routledge
132. Thomas J, Tilley C. 1993. The axe and the torso: symbolic structures in the Neolithic of Brittany. See Tilley 1993, pp. 225-325
133. Tilley C. 1991. Material Culture and Text: The Art of Ambiguity. New York: Routledge
134. Tilley C, ed. 1993. Interpretative Archaeology. Oxford: Berg
135. Tilley C. 1994. A Phenomenonology of Landscape: Places, Paths and Monuments. Oxford: Berg
136. Turner V. 1974. Dramas, Fields, and Metaphors: Symbolic Action in Human Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
137. Ucko P. 1969. Ethnography and archaeological interpretation of funerary remains. World Archaeol. 1:262-80
138. Ucko P, Rosenfeld A. 1967. Palaeolithic Cave Art. New York: McGraw-Hill
139. Walde D, Willows ND, eds. 1991. The Archaeology of Gender. Proc. 22nd Annu. Conf. Archaeol. Assoc. Univ. Calgary. Calgary, Can: Archaeol. Assoc., Univ. Calgary
140. Wallace-Hadrill A. 1988. The social structure of the Roman house. Pap. Br. Sch. Rome 56:43-97
141. Washburn DK, ed. 1983. Structure and Cognition in Art. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
142. White R. 1989. Toward a contextual understanding of the earliest body ornaments. In The Emergence of Modern Humans, ed. E Trinkaus, pp. 211-31. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
143. Whittle A. 1996. Europe in the Neolithic: The Creation of New Worlds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
144. Wobst H. 1977. Stylistic behavior and information exchange. In For the Director: Research Essays in Honor of James B. Griffin, ed. C Cleland, pp. 317-42. Ann Arbor: Mus. Anthropol., Univ. Mich.
145. Wolf E. 1990. Facing power: old insights, new questions. Am. Anthropol. 92:586-96
146. Yates T. 1989. Habitus and social space: some suagestions about meaning in the Saami (Lapp) tent ca. 1700-1900. In The Meanings of Things: Material Culture and Symbolic Expression, ed. I Hodder, pp. 249-62. London: Unwin Hyman
147. Zubrow E. 1994. Knowledge representation and GIS: a cognitive example using GIS. See Renfrew & Zubrow 1994, pp. 107-19