Browne's composite direct product model for MTMM correlation matrices

Structural Equation Modeling

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 191-204

  Bechger, Timo M ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0011142498     PISSN: 10705511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10705519809540099     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Arbuckle, J. L. (1995). Amos for Windows: Analysis of moment structures (Version 3.5) [Computer software]. Chicago: SmallWaters.
2. Bagozzi, R. P. (1993). Assessing construct validity in personality research: Applications to measures of self-esteem. Journal of Research in Personality, 27, 49-87
3. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1990). Assessing method variance in multitrait-multimethod matrices: The case of self-reported affect and perceptions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 547-560.
4. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1992). Testing hypothesis about methods, traits and communalities in the direct-product model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 373-380.
5. Bentler, P. M. (1989). EQS: Structural equations program manual. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.
6. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
7. Brannick, M. T., & Spector, P. E. (1990). Estimation problems in the block-diagonal model of the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 325-339.
8. Browne, M. W. (1984). The decomposition of multitrait-multimethod matrices. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 1-21.
9. Browne, M. W. (1989). Relationships between an additive model and a multiplicative model for multitrait-multimethod matrices. In R. Coppi & S. Bolasco (Eds.), Multiway data analysis (pp. 507-520). New York: North-Holland.
10. Browne, M.W. (1991). MUTMUM: PC user's guide [Computer program and manual]. Columbus: Ohio State University, Department of Psychology.
11. Browne, M. W. (1992). Models for multitrait multimethod matrices. In R. Steyer, K. F. Wenders, & K. F. Widaman (Eds.), Psychometric methodology. Proceedings of the 7th European Meeting of the Psychometric Society in Trier (pp. 61-73). Stuttgart, Germany: Gustav Fisher.
12. Browne, M. W. (1995a, August). The analysis of multitrait-multimethod correlation matrices. Slideshow presented at the meeting of Division 5 of the American Psychological Association, New York.
13. Browne, M. W. (1995b, May). On indeterminacy in the restricted factor analysis model for multitrait multimethod matrices. Paper presented at the 9th European Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Leiden, The Netherlands,
14. Browne, M. W., & Strydom, H. F. (1991). LINLOG: User's guide. Columbus: Ohio State University, Department of Psychology.
15. Browne, M. W., & Strydom, H. F. (1997). Non-iterative fitting of the direct product model for multitrait-multimethod matrices. In M. Berkane (Ed.), Latent variable modeling with applications to causality (pp. 229-245). New York: Springer-Verlag.
16. Byrne, B. M., & Coffin, R. D. (1993). Modelling MTMM data from additive and multiplicative covariance structures: An audit of construct validity concordance. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 67-96.
17. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
18. Campbell, D. T., & O'Connell, E. J. (1967). Method factors in multitrait multimethod matrices: Multiplicative rather than additive? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2, 409-426.
19. Campbell, D. T., & O'Connell, E. J. (1982). Methods as diluting trait relationships rather than adding irrelevant systematic variance. In D. Brinberg & J. Kidder (Eds.), New directions for methodology of social and behavioural science: Forms of validity in research (pp. 93-111). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20. Cudeck, R. (1988). Multiplicative models and MTMM matrices. Journal of Educational Statistics, 13, 131-147.
21. Cideck, R., & Henley, S. J. (1991). Model selection in covariance structure analysis and the problem of sample size: A clarification. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 512-519.
22. Dolan, C. V. (1992). Biometric decomposition of phenotypic means in human samples. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam, Faculty of Psychology.
23. Dudgeon, P. (1994). A reparameterization of the restricted factor analysis model for multitrait-multimethod matrices. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 47, 283-308.
24. Goffin, R. D., & Jackson, D. N. (1992). Analysis of multitrait-multirater performance appraisal data: Composite direct product method versus confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 363-385.
25. Henly, S. J., Klebe, K. J., McBride, J. R., & Cudeck, R. (1989). Adaptive and conventional versions of the DAT: The first complete battery comparison. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 363-371.
26. Hilton, T. L., Beaton, A. E., & Bower, C. P. (1971). Stability in academic growth: A compilation of longitudinal data (Final Report USOE, Research No. 0-0140). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 072 075)
27. Hox, J. J., & Bechger, T. M. (1995). Combining and comparing different approaches to the multitrait multimethod matrix. In J. J. Hox., G. J. Mellenbergh, & P. G. Swanborn (Eds.), Facet theory: Analysis and design. Zeist, The Netherlands: Setos.
28. Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). L1SREL 8 user's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
29. Kiers, H. A. L., Takane, Y., & Ten Berge, J. M. F. (1996). The analysis of multitrait multimethod matrices via constrained components analysis. Psychometrika, 61, 601-628.
30. Lastovicka, J. L., Murry, J. P., & Joachimsthaler, E. A. (1990). Evaluating the measurement validity of lifestyle topologies with qualitative measures and multiplicative factoring. Journal of Marketing Research, 2, 11-23.
31. Neale, M. C. (1997). Mx: Statistical modeling (4th ed.) [Computer software]. Available from Department of Psychiatry, Box 126 MCV, Richmond, VA 23298.
32. Reichardt, C. S., & Coleman, S. C. (1995). The criteria for convergent and discriminant validity in a multitrait-multimethod matrix. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 513-538.
33. Schmitt, N., & Stults, D. M. (1986). Methodology review: Analysis of MTMM matrices. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10, 1-22.
34. Swain, A. J. (1975). Analysis of parametric structures for covariance matrices. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Adelaide.
35. Widaman, K. F. (1985). Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multitrait-multimethod data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 1-26.
36. Wothke, W. (1984). The estimation of trait and method components inmultilrait multimethod measurement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, Department of Behavioral Science.
37. Wothke, W. (1996). Models for multitrait-multimethod matrix analysis. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacher (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 7-56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
38. Wothke, W., & Browne, M. W. (1990). The direct product model for the MTMM matrix parameterized as a second order factor analysis model. Psychometrika, 55, 255-262.