The analysis of multitrait-multimethod matrices via constrained components analysis

Psychometrika

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 601-628

  Kiers, Henk A L ^a   Takane, Yoshio ^a   Ten Berge, Jos M F ^a  

^a Department of Psychology ^*

Author keywords

Alternating least squares algorithms; Common factor analysis; Identification; Partitioning of fit; Principal components analysis; Uniqueness

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030356466     PISSN: 00333123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02294039     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Algina, J. (1980). A note on identification in the oblique and orthogonal factor analysis models. Psychometrika, 45, 393-396.
2. Anderson, T. W., & Rubin, H. (1956). Statistical inference in factor analysis. In: J. Neymann (Ed.) Proceedings of the third Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability (Vol. 5). Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
3. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1990). Assessing method variance in multitrait-multimethod matrices: The case of self-reported affect and perceptions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 547-560.
4. Bekker, P. A. (1986). A note on the identification of restricted factor loading matrices. Psychometrika, 51, 607-611.
5. Brannick, M. T., & Spector, P. E. (1990). Estimation problems of the block diagonal model of the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 325-340.
6. Browne, M. W. (1984). The decomposition of multitrait-multimethod matrices. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 1-21.
7. Browne, M. W. (1993). Models for multitrait-multimethod matrices. In R. Steyer, K. F. Wender, & K. F. Widaman (Eds.), Psychometric Methodology. Proceedings of the 7th European Meeting of the Psychometric Society in Trier (pp. 61-73). Stuttgart and New York: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
8. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
9. Cliff, N. (1966). Orthogonal rotation to congruence. Psychometrika, 31, 33-42.
10. Dudgeon, P. (1994). A reparameterization of the restricted factor analysis model for multitrait-multimethod matrices. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 47, 283-308.
11. Grayson, D., & Marsh, H. W. (1994). Identification with deficient rank loading matrices in confirmatory factor analysis: Multitrait-multimethod models. Psychometrika, 59, 121-134.
12. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7. A guide to the program and applications. Chicago: Scientific Software.
13. Kenny, D. A. (1979). Correlation and Causality. New York: Wiley.
14. Kenny, D. A., & Kashy, D. A. (1992). Analysis of the multitrait-multimethod matrix by confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 165-172.
15. Kiers, H. A. L., & Takane, Y. (1993). Constrained DEDICOM. Psychometrika, 58, 339-355.
16. Kruskal, J. B., Harshman, R. A., & Lundy, M. E. (1989). How 3-MFA data can cause degenerate PARAFAC solutions, among other relationships. In R. Coppi & S. Bolasco (Eds.), Multiway Data Analysis (pp. 115-122). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
17. Lawler, E. E. (1967). The multitrait-multimethod approach to measuring managerial job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 369-381.
18. Marsh, H. W. (1989). Confirmatory factor analysis of multitrait-multimethod data: Many problems and a few solutions. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 335-361.
19. Marsh, H. W., & Bailey, M. (1991). Confirmatory factor analyses of multitrait-multimethod data: A comparison of alternative models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 47-70.
20. Marsh, H. W., Byrne, B. M., & Craven, R. (1992). Overcoming problems in confirmatory factor analyses of MTMM data: The correlated uniqueness model and factorial invariance. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 489-507.
21. Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1983). Confirmatory factor analysis of multitrait-multimethod matrices. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20, 231-248.
22. Millsap, R. E. (1992). Sufficient conditions for rotational uniqueness in the additive MTMM model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45, 125-138.
23. Penrose, R. (1956). On best approximate solutions of linear matrix equations. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 52, 17-19.
24. Schmitt, N., & Stults, D. M. (1986). Methodology review: Analysis of multitrait-multimethod matrices. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10, 1-22.
25. Takane, Y., Kiers, H. A. L., & de Leeuw, J. (1995). Component analysis with different sets of constraints on different dimensions. Psychometrika, 60, 259-280.
26. Werts, C. E., & Linn, R. L. (1970). Path analysis: Psychological examples. Psychological Bulletin, 74, 193-212.
27. Widaman, K. F. (1985). Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multitrait-multimethod data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 1-26.
28. Widaman, K. F. (1990). Bias in pattern loadings represented by common factor analysis and component analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 89-95.
29. Widaman, K. F. (1993). Common factor analysis versus principal component analysis: Differential bias in representing model parameters. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 263-311.
30. Wothke, W. (1987). Multivariate linear models of the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC ED 283850, TM 870369).
31. Wothke, W., & Browne, M. W. (1990). The direct product model for the MTMM matrix parameterized as a second order factor analysis model. Psychometrika, 55, 255-262.