Female preferences and effective population size

Animal Conservation

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 173-177

  Blumstein, Daniel T ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010771624     PISSN: 13679430     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1367943098000134     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
2. Bakker, T. C. M. (1993). Positive genetic correlation between female preference and preferred male ornament in sticklebacks. Nature, Lond. 363: 255-257.
3. Bateson, P. (Ed.) (1983). Mate choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Berger, J. (1996). Animal behaviour and plundered mammals: is the study of mating systems a scientific luxury or a conservation necessity? Oikos 77: 207-216.
5. Berglund, A. (1993). Risky sex: male pipefishes mate at random in the presence of a predator. Anim. Behav. 46: 169-175.
6. Boag, P. T. & Grant, P. R. (1981). Intense natural selection in a population of Darwin's finches (Geospizinae) in the Galápagos. Science 214: 82-85.
7. Brown, L. (1981). Patterns of female choice in mottled sculpins (Cottidae, Teleostei). Anim. Behav. 29: 375-382.
8. Brown, L. & Downhower, J. F. (1983). Constraints on female choice in the mottled sculpin. In Social behavior of female vertebrates: 39-54. Wasser, S. K. (Ed.). New York: Academic Press.
9. Butlin, R. K. (1993). The variability of mating signals and preferences in the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Homoptera: Delphacidae). J. Insect Behav. 6: 125-140.
10. Charlesworth, B. (1994). Evolution in age-structured populations. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Chepko-Sade, B. D., Shields, W. M., Berger, J., Halpin, Z. T., Jones, W. T., Rogers, L. L., Rood, P. P. & Smith, A. T. (1987). The effects of dispersal and social structure on effective population size. In Mammalian dispersal patterns: the effects of social structure on population genetics: 287-321. Chepko-Sade, B. D. & Halpin, Z. T. (Eds). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Clutton-Brock, T. H. & Albon, S. D. (1979). The roaring of red deer and the evolution of honest advertisement. Behaviour 69: 145-169.
13. Endler, J. A. (1983). Natural and sexual selection on color patterns in poeciliid fishes. Environ. Biol. Fishes 9: 173-190.
14. Endler, J. A. & Théry, M. (1996). Interacting effects of lek placement, display behavior, ambient light, and color pattern in three neotropical forest-dwelling birds. Am. Nat. 148: 421-452.
15. Fisher, R. A. (1958). The genetical theory of natural selection. 2nd edn. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.
16. Forsgren, E. (1992). Predation risk affects mate choice in a gobiid fish. Am. Nat. 140: 1041-1049.
17. Frankham, R. (1995a). Effective population size/adult population size ratios in wildlife: a review. Genet. Res. Camb. 66: 95-107.
18. Frankham, R. (1995b). Conservation genetics. Annu. Rev. Gen. 29: 205-327.
19. Frankham, R. (1995c). Inbreeding and extinction: a threshold effect. Conserv. Biol. 9: 792-799.
20. Franklin, I. R. (1980). Evolutionary change in small populations. In Conservation biology: an evolutionary-ecological perspective: 135-149. Soulé, M. E. & Wilcox, B. A. (Eds). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
21. Gilpin, M. E. & Soulé, M. E. (1986). Minimum viable populations: processes of species extinction. In Conservation biology the science of scarcity and diversity: 19-34. Soulé, M. E. (Ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
22. Godin, J. J-G. & Dugatkin, L. A. (1995). Variability and repeatability of female mating preferences in the guppy. Anim. Behav. 49: 1427-1433.
23. Griffith, B., Scott, J. M., Carpenter, J. W. & Reed, C. (1989). Translocation as a species conservation tool: status and strategy. Science 245: 477-480.
24. Höglund, J. (1996). Can mating systems affect local extinction risks? Two examples of lek-breeding waders. Oikos 77: 184-188.
25. Houde, A. E. (1987). Mate choíce based upon naturally occurring color-pattern variation in a guppy population. Evolution 41: 1-10.
26. Houde, A. E. & Endler, J. A. (1990). Correlated evolution of female mating preferences and male color patterns in the guppy Poecilia reticulata. Science 248: 1405-1408.
27. Janetos, A. A. (1980). Strategies of female mate choice: a theoretical analysis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 7: 107-112.
28. Jennions, M. D., Bacwell, P. R. Y. & Passmore, N. I. (1995). Repeatability of mate choice: the effect of size in the African painted reed frog, Hyperolius mamoratus. Anim. Behav. 49: 181-186.
29. Lande, R. (1981). Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78: 3721-3725.
30. Luttbeg, B. (1996). A comparative Bayes tactic for mate assessment and choice. Behav. Ecol. 7: 451-460.
31. McLain, D. K., Moulton, M. P. & Redfearn, T. P. (1995). Sexual selection and the risk of extinction of introduced birds on oceanic islands. Oikos 74: 27-34.
32. Milinski, M. & Bakker, T. C. M. (1990). Female sticklebacks use male coloration in mate choice and hence avoid parasitized males. Nature, Lond. 344: 330-333.
33. Møller, A. P. (1989), Viability costs of male tail ornaments in a swallow. Nature, Lond. 339: 132-135.
34. Nunney, L. (1993). The influence of mating system and overlapping generations on effective population size. Evolution 47: 1329-1341.
35. Parker, P. G. & Waite, T. A. (1997). Mating systems, effective population size, and conservation of natural populations. In Behavioral approaches to conservation in the wild: 243-261.
36. Clemmons, J. R. & Buchholz, R. (Eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Primack, R. B. (1993). Essentials of conservation biology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
38. Real, L. (1990). Sequential search theory and mate choice I. Models of single-sex discrimination. Am. Nat. 136: 376-404.
39. Reid, M. L. & Stamps, J. A. (1997). Female mate choice tactics in a resource-based mating system: field tests of alternative models. Am. Nat. 150: 98-121.
40. Ritchie, M. G. (1996). The shape of female mating preferences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93: 14628-14631.
41. Ryan, M. J. (1985). The túngara frog. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42. Ryan, M. J. & Keddy-Hector, A. (1992). Directional patterns of female mate choice and the role of sensory biases. Am. Nat. 139: S4-S35.
43. Ryan, M. J. & Wilczynski, W. (1988). Coevolution of sender and receiver: effect on local mate preference in cricket frogs. Science 240: 1786-1788.
44. Seehausen, O., van Alphen, J. M. & Witte, F. (1997). Cichlid fish diversity threatened by eutrophication that curbs sexual selection. Science 277: 1808-1811.
45. Thornhill, R. (1984). Alternative female choice tactics in the scorpionfly Hylobittacus apicalis (Mecoptera) and their implications. Am. Zool. 24: 367-383.
46. Wagner, W. E. Jr, Murray, A.-M. & Cade, W. H. (1995). Phenotypic variation in the mating preferences of female field crickets, Gryllus integer. Anim. Behav. 49: 1269-1281.
47. Waite, T. A. & Parker, P. G. (1997). Extra-pair paternity and the effective size of socially monogamous populations. Evolution 51: 620-621.
48. Wittenberger, J. F. (1983). Tactics of mate choice. In Mate choice: 435-447. Bateson, P. (Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. Wright, S. (1938). Size of population and breeding structure in relation to evolution. Science 87: 430-431.
50. Zuk, M., Johnson, K., Thornhill, R. & Ligon, J. D. (1990). Mechanisms of female choice in red jungle fowl. Evolution 44: 477-485.