Extrapair paternity and the effective size of socially monogamous populations

Evolution

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 620-621

  Waite, Thomas A ^a,b   Parker, Patricia G ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Effective population size; extrapair fertilizations; monogamy; paternity; sexual selection

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030919808     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb02450.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. BIRKHEAD, T. R., AND A. P. MLLER. 1995. Extra-pair copulation and extra-pair paternity in birds. Anim. Behav. 49:843-848.
2. CABALLERO, A. 1994. Developments in the prediction of effective population size. Heredity 73:657-679.
3. DAVIDAR, P., AND E. S. MORTON. 1992. Living with parasites: Prevalence of a blood parasite and its effects on survivorship in the purple martin. Auk 110:109-116.
4. FRANKHAM, R. 1996. Effective population size/adult population size ratios in wildlife: A review. Genet. Res. 66:95-107.
5. HILL, G. E., R. MONTGOMERY, C. ROEDER, AND P. BOAG. 1994. Sexual selection and cuckoldry in a monogamous songbird: Implications for sexual selection theory. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 35:193-199.
6. KEMPENAERS, B., G. R. VERHEYEN, M. VAN DEN BROECK, T. BURKE, C. VAN BROECKHOVEN, AND A. A. DHONDT. 1992. Extra-pair paternity results from female preference for high quality males in the blue tit. Nature 357:494-496.
7. LACK, D. 1968. Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. Metheun, London.
8. NUNNEY, L. 1993. The influence of mating system and overlapping generations on effective population size. Evolution 47:1329-1341.
9. _ 1995. Measuring the ratio of effective population size to adult numbers using genetic and ecological data. Evolution 47:1329-1341.
10. _ 1996. The influence of variation in female fecundity on effective population size. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 59:411-425.
11. NUNNEY, L., AND K. A. CAMPBELL. 1993. Assessing minimum viable population size: Demography meets populations genetics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8:234-239.
12. NUNNEY, L., AND D. R. ELAM. 1994. Estimating the effective population size of conserved populations. Cons. Biol. 8:175-184.
13. PARKER, P. G., AND T. A. WAITE. 1997. Mating systems, effective population size, and conservation of natural populations. Pp. 243-261 in J. Clemmons and R. Buchholz, eds. Behavioral approaches to conservation in the wild. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
14. PARKER, P. G., T. A. WAITE, AND T. PEARE. 1996. Paternity studies in animal populations. Pp. 413-423 in T. B. Smith and R. K. Wayne, eds. Molecular genetics in conservation. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
15. STUTCHBURY, B. J. 1994. Extrapair paternity in hooded warblers. Behav. Ecol. 5:384-392.
16. SUGG, D. W., AND R. K. CHESSER. 1994. Effective population sizes with multiple paternity. Genetics 137:1147-1155.
17. WAGNER, R. H., M. D. SCHUG, AND E. S. MORTON. 1996. Conditiondependent control of paternity by female purple martins: Implications for coloniality. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 38:379-389.
18. WAITE, T. A., AND P. G. PARKER. 1996. Dimensionless life histories and effective population size. Cons. Biol. 10:1456-1462.