Should you publish in electronic journals?

Journal of Electronic Publishing

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2000, Pages

  Sweeney, Aldrin E ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010140826     PISSN: 10802711     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Editorial

References (16)

1. C.A. Bowers. 1998. Toward a balanced perspective on the educational uses of computers: Advantages, myths, and the responsibilities of educators. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1(1), 75-83.
2. J.M. Budd. 1995. Faculty publishing productivity: An institutional analysis and comparison with library and other measures. College and Research Libraries, 56, 547-554.
3. A. Dixon. 1997. Electronic publishing and the academic community: A publisher's perspective. In Ian Butterworth's (Ed.), The impact of electronic publishing on the academic community (Session 1: The present situation and the likely future). International Workshop organized by the Academia Europaea and the Wenner-Gren Foundation, Wenner-Gren Center, Stockholm, Sweden, April 16-20, 1997. [Online]. Available: http://tiepac.portlandpress.co.uk/books/online/tiepac/session1/ch2.htm
4. Florida Board of Regents. 2000. Florida Board of Regents: University information. [Online]. Available: http://www.borfl.org/univ_info/unitour.asp
5. S. Harnad, Ed. 1982. Peer commentary on peer review: A case study in scientific quality control. NY: Cambridge University Press.
6. S. Harnad. 1986. Policing the paper chase. (Review of S. Lock, A difficult balance: Peer review in biomedical publication.) Nature, 322, 24-5.
7. S. Harnad. 1996. Implementing peer review on the Net: Scientific quality control in scholarly electronic journals. In R. Peek & G. Newby's (Eds.), Scholarly publication: The electronic frontier (pp. 103-108). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [Online]. Available: ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Harnad/HTML/harnad96.peer.review.html
8. R. Kling and L. Covi. 1995. Electronic journals and legitimate media in the systems of scholarly communication. The Information Society, 11(4), 261-271. [Online]. Available: http://www.ics.uci.edu/~kling/klingej2.html
9. T.S. Kuhn. 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd edition). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10. Merriam-Webster. 1976. Webster's new collegiate dictionary. Springfield, MA: Author.
11. V.H. Resh 1998. Science and communication: An author/editor/user's perspective on the transition from paper to electronic publishing. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship, 19. [Online]. Available: http://www.library.ucsb.edu/istl/98-summer/article3.html
12. P. Roberts. 1999. Scholarly publishing, peer review and the Internet. First Monday, 4(4). [Online]. Available: http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue4_4/proberts/index.html
13. M. Ryder. 1997. The peer review process: Excerpts from major articles. [Online]. Available: http://www.cudenver.edu/~mryder/peer/peer_review.html
14. J.J.Seneca. 1999. Memorandum to Provosts, Deans, Directors, and Department Chairs (1999-2000 Academic Reappointment/Promotion Instructions). [Online]. Available: http://www.rutgers.edu/oldqueens/instruct.doc
15. H.R. Varian. 1997. The future of electronic journals: Some speculations about the evolution of academic electronic publishing. Paper presented at the Scholarly Communication and Technology Conference, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, April 1997. [Online]. Available: http://arl.cni.org/scomm/scat/varian.html
16. S. Whisler. 1997. The economic realities of journal publishing. Newsletter on Serials Pricing Issues. 172.3 [Online]. Available: http://www.lib.unc.edu/prices/1997/PRIC172.HTML#172.3 [September 1997].