Liability rules for international trading of greenhouse gas emissions quotas

Climate Policy

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 85-108

  Haites, Erik ^a   Missfeldt, Fanny ^b  

^a Margaree Consultants Inc   (Canada)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Buyer liability; Emissions trading; Kyoto protocol; Liability rules; Seller liability

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010126359     PISSN: 14693062     EISSN: 17527457     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1469-3062(00)00006-1     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Babiker, M.H., Reilly, J.M., Eckaus, R.S., Wing, I.S., 2000. EPPA 3.0 Documentation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, mimeograph, in preparation.
2. Baron, R., 1999. An Assessment of Liability Rules for International GHG Emissions Trading. International Energy Agency Information Paper, Paris, October.
3. Center for Clean Air Policy (CCAP), 2000. Recommendations on the Implementation of International Emissions Trading and Related Inventory, Reporting, Review and Compliance Procedures and Mechanisms. UNFCCC Secretariat, Center for Clean Air Policy, Washington, DC, January.
4. Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL), 1999. The Compliance Fund: A New Tool for Achieving Compliance Under the Kyoto Protocol. Washington, DC, June.
5. Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL), 2000. Hybrid Liability Revisited: Bridging the Divide between Buyer and Seller Liability. Draft, Washington, DC, September.
6. Climate Action Network, 2000. Submission by US Climate Action Network in Response to the Note by the Chairman of the Contact Group on Mechanisms. Washington, DC, January.
7. Chayes, A., Handler Chayes, A., 1998. The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
8. Ellerman, A.D., Wing, I.S., 2000. Supplementarity: An Invitation to Monopsony? Report 59. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Climate Change, Cambridge, MA, April.
9. Environmental Defense, 2000. The Kyoto Protocol: Maintaining the Dynamic Balance. Working Paper Draft 3.2, Washington, DC, August.
10. Haites, E., 1998. International Emissions Trading and Compliance with GHG Limitation Commitments, Working Paper W70. International Academy of the Environment, Geneva.
11. Haites, E., Missfeldt, F., 2000. Costs and Environmental Impacts of Liability Proposals. EPRI, Palo Alto, CA, unpublished.
12. Hargrave, T., et al., 1999. Defining Kyoto Protocol Non-compliance Procedures and Mechanisms, Center for Clean Air Policy. Leiden International Emissions Trading Papers, Washington, DC, October.
13. Nordhaus, R.R., Danish, K.W., Rosenzweig, R.H., Fleming, B.S., 2000a. International emissions trading rules as a compliance tool: what is necessary, effective and workable? Environmental Law Reporter 30, in press.
14. Nordhaus, R.R., Danish, K.W., Rosenzweig, R.H., Fleming, B.S., 2000b. A framework for achieving environmental integrity and the economic benefits of emissions trading under the Kyoto protocol. Environmental Law Reporter 30, in press.
15. Reilly J., Prinn R., Harnisch J., Fitzmaurice J., Jacoby H., Klicklighter D., Melillo J., Stone P., Sokolov A., Wang C. Multi-gas assessment of the Kyoto Protocol. Nature. 401:1999;549-555.
16. Shavell, S., 1987. Economic Analysis of Accident Law. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
17. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), 1997. The Kyoto Protocol. Climate Change Secretariat, Bonn.
18. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), 1999. Principles, Modalities, Rules and Guidelines for the Mechanisms under Articles 6, 12 and 17 of the Kyoto Protocol. Submissions from Parties. Note by the Secretariat. Addendum, Corrigendum (FCCC/SB/1999/MISC.3/Add.2/Corr.1), Bonn, June.
19. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), 2000a. Procedures and Mechanisms Relating to Compliance Under the Kyoto Protocol: Report of the Joint Working Group on Compliance on Its Work During the Twelfth Sessions of the Subsidiary Bodies. Proposals from the Co-Chairmen of the Joint Working Group on Compliance, FCCC/SB/2000/CRP.3/Rev.1, Bonn, June.
20. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), 2000b. Mechanisms Pursuant to Articles 6, 12 and 17 of the Kyoto Protocol: Consolidated Text on Principles, Modalities, Rules and Guidelines. Note by the Chairmen, (FCCC/SB/2000/4), Bonn, June.
21. Weyant, J.P., Hill, J.N., 1999. Introduction and overview, the costs of the Kyoto protocol: a multi-model evaluation. Energy J., Special Issue, May, pp. vii-xliv.