Administration language and differential item functioning;Idioma de aplicación y rendimiento en una prueba de comprensión verbal

Psicothema

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 201-206

  Oliden, Paula Elosua ^a   Jáuregui, Alicia López ^a   Makazaga, Josu Egaña ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009961634     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ackerman, T.A.(1992) Didactic explanation of item bias,item impact, and item validity from a multidimensional perspective. Journal of educational measurement, 29(1), 67-91.
2. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC.American Psychological Association
3. Artamendi, J.A. (1994) Rendimiento de bilingües en test de aptitudes según lengua/s de presentación. En I.Idiazabal y A.Kaifer (Eds.),Eficacia educativa y enseñanza bilingüe en el País Vasco (pag.89-116) Vitoria: Instituto Vasco de Administración Pública
4. Baker, F.B. (1994) EQUATE2: Computer program for equating two metrics in item response theory [Computer program]. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Laboratory of Experimental Design
5. Bontempo, R.(1993). Translation fidelity of psychological scales: An item response theory analysis of an individualism-collectivism scale. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 24(2), 149-167.
6. Brislin, R.W.(1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural psychology, 1(3), 185-216.
7. Budgell, G.R., Raju, N.S. y Quarteti, D.A.(1995) Analysis of Differential Item Functioning in Translated Assessment Instruments. Applied psychological Measurement, 19(4), 309-321.
8. Candell, G.L. y Hulin, C.L. (1986). Cross-language and Cross-cultural comparisons in scale translations. Independent sources of information about item nonequivalence. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 1(4), 417-440.
9. Candell, G.L. y Drasgow, F.(1988): An iterative procedure for linking metrics and assessing item bias in item response theory. Applied psychological measurement, 12(3), 253-260.
10. Collins, McCormick y Zatkin (1986) Factor recovery in binary data sets a simulation. Multivariate Behavioral Research 21, 377-391
11. Collison, G.(1974) Concept formation in a second language: a study of gahaniaian school children. Harvard Educational Review, 44, 441-457.
12. Drasgow, F. (1984). Scrutinizing Psychological Test: Measurement equivalence and equivalent relations with external variables are the central issues. Psychological Bulletin, 95(1), 134-35.
13. Drasgow, F. y Hulin, C.L. (1987). Cross-cultural meassurement. Revista interamericana de psicología/Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 21(1,2), 1-24.
14. Drasgow, F. y Lissak, R.I. (1983) Modified parallel analysis: A procedure for examining the latent dimensionality of dichotomously scored item responses. Journal of Applied psychology, 68(3), 363-373.
15. Ellis, B.B.(1989) Differential item functioning: implications of tests translation. Journal of applied psychology, 74(6), 912-921.
16. Ellis, B.B. (1991) Item response theory: a tool for assessing. Bulletin of the international test commission, 18, 33-51.
17. Ellis, BB., Becker, P. y Kimmel, H.D.(1993). An item response theory evaluation on an english version of the Trier Personality Inventory (TPI). Journal of Cross-cultural psychology, 24(2), 133-148.
18. Ellis, B.B., Minsel, B. y Becker, P. (1989) Evaluation of attitude survey translations: an investigation using item response theory. International journal of psychology, 24, 665-684.
19. Elosua, P. y López. A(1999b) Funcionamiento diferencial de los items y sesgo en la adaptación de dos pruebas verbales. Psicológica 20(1),23-40
20. Elosua, P., López, A. y Torres, E.(1999a) Adaptación al euskera de una prueba de inteligencia verbal. Psicothema, 11(1), 151-161
21. Elosua, P., López, A., Artamendi, J.A. y Yenes, F. (manuscrito enviado para su publicación) Funcionamietno diferencial de los ítems en la aplicación de pruebas psicologicas en entornos bilingües.
22. Feldt, L.S.(1969). A test of the hypothesis that Cronbach's alpha or Kuder-Richardson coefficient twenty is the same for two test, Psychometrika, 34, 363-373.
23. Ferrando, P.J.(1994) El problema del factor de dificultad: una revisión y algunas consideraciones prácticas. Psicológica, 15,2,275-283.
24. Fidalgo, A.M.(1994) MHDIF: a computer program for detecting uniform and nonuniform differential item functioning with the Mantel-Haenszel procedure [computer program] Dpto. Psicología, Universidad de Oviedo.2
25. Hambleton, R.K.(1993). Translating achievement test for use in cross-national studies. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 9(1), 57-68.
26. Hambleton, R.K.(1996) Adaptación de tests para su uso en diferentes idiomas y culturas:fuentes de error, posibles soluciones y directrices prácticas. En J.Muñiz (Coor.)Psicometría (pp.207-238). Madrid: Universitas, S.A.
27. Hambleton, R.K. y Rogers, H.J.(1989) Detecting potentially biased test items:Comparison of IRT area and Mantel-Haenszel methods. Applied Measurement in Education, 2(4), 313-334.
28. Holland, P.W. y Thayer, D.T.(1988). Differential Item Performance and the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. In H. Wainer y H.J. Braun (eds.), Test validity (pp. 129-145). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Hulin, C.L. (1987). A psychometric theory of evaluations of item scale translations. Journal of cross-cultural Psychology, 18(2),115-142
30. Hulin, C.L., Drasgow, F. y Komocar, J. (1982). Applications of item response theory to analysis of attitude scale translations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(6), 818-825).
31. Hulin, C.L., Drasgow, F. y Parsons, C.K. (1983) Item response theory: Application to psychological measurement. Homewood, Illinois: Dow Jones/Irwin.
32. Hulin, C.L. y Mayer, L. (1986) Psychometric equivalence of a translation of the job descriptive index into hebrew. Journal of applied psychology, 71(1), 83-94.
33. Kelly, M., Tenezakis, M. Y Huntsman, R. (1973) Some unusual conservation behavior in children exposed to two culures. British journal of educational psychology, 43, 171-182
34. Kim S.H. y Cohen, A.S. (1992). IRTDIF: A computer program for IRT differential item functioning analysis [Computer Program] University of Wisconsin-Madison.
35. Lord, F.M.(1980). Applications of Item Response Theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
36. 2 statistics. Journal of Educational Measurement, 18(4), 229-248.
37. Mislevy, R.J. y Bock, R.D.(1990). BILOG-3: Item analysis and test scoring with binary logistic models.[Computer program]. Mooresville, IN: Scientific software.
38. Mun̄iz, J. Y Hambleton, R.K. (1992) Medio siglo de teoría de respuesta a los ítems. Anuarío de psicología, 52, 41-66.
39. Palmer, M.(1972) Effects of categorization degree of bilingualism and language upon recall of select monolingual and bilingual. Journal of educational psychology, 63, 160-164.
40. Reckase, M.D.(1979): Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests: results and implications. Journal of Educational Statistics, 4, 207-230.
41. Raju, N.S. Drasgow, F. y Slinde, J.A.(1993): An empirical comparison of the area methods, Lord's chi square test, and the Mantel-Haenszel technique for assessing differential item functioning. Educational and psychological measurement, 53, 301-304
42. Stocking, M.L. y Lord, F.M. (1983) Developing a common metric in Item Response Theory. Applied psychological measurement, 7(2), 201-210.
43. Tatsuoka, M.M.(1988) Multivariate analysis:Techniques for educational and psychological research. New York:Macmillan
44. Yuste, C. (1988). BADYG-E. Madrid. Ciencias de la educación preescolar y especial.