Adaptation to basque of a verbal ability test;Adaptación al euskera de una prueba de inteligencia verbal

Psicothema

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 151-161

  Elosúa Oliden, Pauli ^a   López Jáuregui, Alicia ^b   Torres Álvarez, Esther ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345978399     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2. Bock, R.D. & Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximuum likelihood estimation of ítem parameters. Psychometrika, 46(4), 443-459.
3. Brislin, R.W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216.
4. Elosúa, P., López, A. & Artamendi, J.A. (1994). Elebiduntasunari buruzko testaren bidez lorturiko datoen azterketa kuantitatiboa. Tantak, 12, 197-218.
5. Feldt, L.S. (1969). A test of the hypothesis that Cronbach's alpha or Kuder-Richardson coefficient twenty is the same for two test, Psychometrika, 34, 363-373.
6. Fidalgo, A.M. (1994). MHDIF: A computer program for detecting uniform and nonuniform differential ítem functioning with the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. Dpto. Psicología, Universidad de Oviedo [Computer program].
7. Gómez, J. y Navas, M.J. (1995, Abril). Detección del sesgo mediante regresión logística: purificación paso a paso de la habilidad. Comunicación presentada al IV Symposium de Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, Murcia, España.
8. Hambleton, R.K. (1993). Translating achievement test for use in cross-national studies. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 9(1), 57-68.
9. Hammers, B. & Blanc, M. (1983). Bilingualité et Bilinguisme. Bruxelles: Pierre Mardaga Ed.
10. Hattie, J. (1984). An empirical study of various indices for determining unidimensionality. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 19, 49-78.
11. Hattie, J. (1985). Methodology review: Assessing unidimensionality of test and ítems. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9(2), 139-164.
12. Holland, P.W. & Thayer, D.T. (1988). Differential Ítem Performance and the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. In H. Wainer & H.J. Braun (eds.), Test validity (pp. 129-145). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Kolen, M.J. (1981). Comparation of traditional and ítem response theory methods for equating tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 18, 1-11.
14. Lord, F.M. (1980). Applications of Ítem Response Theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
15. Mazor, K.M., Clauser, P.E. & Hambleton, R.K. (1994). Identification of nonuniform Differential Ítem Functioning using a variation of the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 284-291.
16. Mislevy, R.J. & Bock, R.D. (1986). Bilog: Ítem analysis and test scoring with binary logistic models.[Computer program]. Mooresville, IN: Scientific software.
17. Muñiz, J. (1990). Teoría de respuesta a los ítems. Madrid. Pirámide.
18. Oort, F.J. (1992). Using restricted factor analysis to detect ítem bias. Methodika, VI, 150-166.
19. Pine, S.M. (1977). Applications of Ítem Response Theory to problem of test bias. In D.J. Weiss(Ed.), Applications of computerized adaptive testing (pp.37-43); (Research Report N° 77-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
20. Rummerl, J.R. (1970). Applied Factor Analysis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
21. Sánchez, G.I. (1932). Scores of Spanish-speaking children on repeated tests. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 40(1).
22. Sanchez, G.I. (1934). Bilingualism and mental measures: A world of caution. Journal of Applied Psychology, 18.
23. Scheuneman, J.D. (1979). A method of assessing bias in test ítems. Journal of Educational Measurement, 16(3), 143-152.
24. Schneewind, K & Cattell, R.B. (1970). Zum Problem der Faktoridentifikation: Verteilungen und Vertranensintervalle von Kongruentzkoeffizienten. Psychology Beiträge, 12, 214-226.
25. Shealy, R. & Stout, W. (1993). An item response theory model of test bias and differential test functioning. In W.P. Holland & H. Wainer (Eds.), Differential ítem functioning (pp. 197-240). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26. Stout, W. & Roussos, L. (1995). SIBTEST [Computer program]. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Statistical laboratory for Educational and Psychological Measurement.
27. Swaminathan, H. & Rogers, H.J. (1990). Detecting differentail item functioning using logistic regresion procedures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27(4), 361-370.
28. Thiseen, D. & Wainer, H. (1982). Some standards errors in Ítem Response Theory. Psychometrika, 47(4), 397-412.
29. Van der Flier, H., Mellenbergh, G.J., Adèr, H.J. & Wijn, M. (1984). An iterative item bias detection method. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21(2), 131.145.
30. Wrigley, C. & Neuhhaus, J.O. (1955). The matching of two sets of factors. Contract Memorandum Report. University of Illinois.
31. Yuste, C. (1988). BADYG-E. Madrid. Ciencias de la educación preescolar y especial.