-
1
-
-
0000791128
-
-
U. Landman, W. D. Luedtke, N. A. Burnham, and R. J. Colton, Science 248, 454 (1990); U. Landham, W. D. Luedtke, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 9, 414 (1991); U. Landman, W. D. Luedtke, and E. Ringer, Wear 153, 3 (1992)
-
U. Landman, W. D. Luedtke, N. A. Burnham, and R. J. Colton, Science 248, 454 (1990); U. Landham, W. D. Luedtke, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 9, 414 (1991); U. Landman, W. D. Luedtke, and E. Ringer, Wear 153, 3 (1992).
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
21544457244
-
-
M. R. Sørensen, K. W. Jacobsen, and P. Stoltze (unpublished)
-
M. R. Sørensen, K. W. Jacobsen, and P. Stoltze (unpublished).
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
8744270531
-
-
M. Büttiker, Y. Imry, R. Landauer, and S. Pinhas, Phys. Rev. B AIP 31, 6207 (1985).
-
(1985)
Phys. Rev. B AIP
, vol.31
, pp. 6207
-
-
Büttiker, M.1
Imry, Y.2
Landauer, R.3
Pinhas, S.4
-
8
-
-
0029326440
-
-
J. M. Krans, J. M. van Ruitenbeek, V. V. Fisun, I. K. Yanson, and L. J. de Jongh, Nature 375, 767 (1995); J. I. Pascual; J. Mendez; J. Gómez-Herrero, A. M. Baró, N. Garcia, U. Landman, W. D. Luedtke, E. N. Bogachek, and H.-P. Cheng, Science 267, 1793 (1995); L. Oleson, E. Laegsgaard, I. Steensgaard, F. Besenbacher, J. Schiøtz, P. Stoltze, K. W. Jacobsen, and J. K. Nørsov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2251 (1994); N. Agraït, J. G. Rodrigo, and S. Vieira, Phys. Rev. B 47, 12345 (1993)
-
J. M. Krans, J. M. van Ruitenbeek, V. V. Fisun, I. K. Yanson, and L. J. de Jongh, Nature 375, 767 (1995); J. I. Pascual; J. Mendez; J. Gómez-Herrero, A. M. Baró, N. Garcia, U. Landman, W. D. Luedtke, E. N. Bogachek, and H.-P. Cheng, Science 267, 1793 (1995); L. Oleson, E. Laegsgaard, I. Steensgaard, F. Besenbacher, J. Schiøtz, P. Stoltze, K. W. Jacobsen, and J. K. Nørsov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2251 (1994); N. Agraït, J. G. Rodrigo, and S. Vieira, Phys. Rev. B 47, 12345 (1993).
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
21544443671
-
-
Because the constriction corresponds to an extremum of the neck cross section, the derivative of the cross section with respect to the neck axis vanishes at this point. Therefore, the cylinder approximation is correct to the first order
-
Because the constriction corresponds to an extremum of the neck cross section, the derivative of the cross section with respect to the neck axis vanishes at this point. Therefore, the cylinder approximation is correct to the first order.
-
-
-
|