Big stuff, little stuff: A decennial measurement of executives' and academics' reactions to questionable usage elements

Journal of Business Communication

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 439-475

  Gilsdorf, Jeanette ^a,c   Leonard, Don ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Business writing; English language; Grammar; Pedagogy; Usage

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009670284     PISSN: 00219436     EISSN: 15524582     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002194360103800403     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Andera, F., & Condon, G. (1986). The frequency of occurrence of punctuation rules, format, and English style in written business communications. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 2, 197-210.
2. Anson, C. M., & Forsberg, L. L. (1990). Moving beyond the academic community: Transitional stages in professional writing. Written Communication, 7, 200-231.
3. Baker, R. (1981, April 26). The English Mafia, New York Times Magazine, 29.
4. Baron, D. E. (1982). Grammar and good taste: Reforming the American language. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5. Bex, T. (1999). Representations of English in twentieth-century Britain: Fowler, Gowers and Partridge. In T. Bex & R. J. Watts (Eds.), Standard English: The widening debate (pp. 89-109). New York: Routledge.
6. Bloomfield, M. W. (1985). The question of correctness. In S. Greenbaum (Ed.), The English language today (pp. 265-270). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
7. Bowman, J. P., & Klopping, I. (1999). Bandstands, bandwidth, and business communication: Technology and the sanctity of writing. Business Communication Quarterly, 62(1), 82-90.
8. Boyd, R. (1995). "Grammatical monstrosities" and "contemptible miscreants": Sacrificial violence in the late nineteenth-century usage handbook. In S. Hunter & R. Wallace (Eds.), The place of grammar in writing instruction (pp. 54-70). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
9. Burchfield, R. W. (1998). The new Fowler's modern English usage (rev. 3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10. Carter, R. (1994). Standard Englishes in teaching and learning. In M. Hayhoe & S. Parker (Eds.), Who owns English? (pp. 11-23). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
11. Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (1995). Grammar and the spoken language. Applied Linguistics, 16, 141-158.
12. Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.
13. Connors, R. J., & Lunsford, A. A. (1988). Frequency of formal errors in current college writing, or Ma and Pa Kettle do research. College Composition and Communication, 39, 395-409.
14. Copperud, R. H. (1980). American usage and style: The consensus. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
15. Crowley, T. (1989). Standard English and the politics of language. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
16. Crowley, T. (1999). Curiouser and curiouser: Falling standards in the Standard English debate. In T. Bex & R. J. Watts (Eds.), Standard English: The widening debate (pp. 271-280). New York: Routledge.
17. Crystal, D. (1994). Which English - or English which? In M. Hayhoe & S. Parker (Eds.), Who owns English? (pp. 108-114). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
18. Drake, G. F. (1977). The role of prescriptivism in American linguistics, 1830-1970. In Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science: Studies in the history of linguistics (Series 3, Vol. 13). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
19. Edlund, J. R. (1995). The rainbow and the stream: Grammar as system versus language in use. In S. Hunter & R. Wallace (Eds.), The place of grammar in writing instruction: Past, present, future (pp. 89-101). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
20. Eisenstein, E. L. (1979). The printing press as an agent of change: Communications and cultural transformations in early modern Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Finegan, E. (1980). Attitudes toward English usage: The history of a war of words. New York: Teachers College Press.
22. Francis, W. N. (1965). The English language: An introduction. New York: W. W. Norton.
23. Gould, C. (1987). Josephine Turck Baker, Correct English and the ancestry of pop grammar. English Journal, 76, 22-28.
24. Greenbaum, S. (1988). Good English and the grammarian. New York: Longman.
25. Hairston, M. (1981). Not all errors are created equal: Nonacademic readers in the professions respond to lapses in usage. College English, 43, 794-806.
26. Hamilton, K., & Rhodes, S. (1997, October 20). So I'm like, "Who needs this grammar stuff?" Newsweek, 15.
27. Heath, S. B. (1980). Standard English: Biography of a symbol. In T. Shopen & J. M. Williams (Eds.), Standards and dialects in English (pp. 3-32). Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
28. Hillocks, G., Jr. (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills and the National Conference on Research in English.
29. Honey, J. (1997). Language is power: The story of standard English and its enemies. Boston: Faber and Faber.
30. Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Gender differences in verbal ability: A metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 53-69.
31. Kibbee, D. (1998). Honey, J., Language is power: The story of standard English and its enemies. Journal of Linguistics, 34, 525-530.
32. Leonard, D. J., & Gilsdorf, J. W. (1990). Language in change: Academics' and executives' perceptions of usage errors. The Journal of Business Communication, 27, 137-158.
33. Li, L. (2000). E-mail: A challenge to Standard English? English Today: The International Review of the English Language, 16, 23-29, 55.
34. Maynor, N. (1994). The language of electronic mail: Written speech? In G. D. Little & M. Montgomery (Eds.), Centennial usage studies (pp. 48-54). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press for the American Dialect Society.
35. Merrier, P. A. (1991). The extent to which students' reactions to usage errors change as a result of having completed a business communication course. The Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 54(4), 27-30.
36. Meyers, W. E. (1972). A study of usage items based on an examination of the Brown corpus. College Composition and Communication, 23, 155-169.
37. Meyers, W. E. (1994). Usage items in current handbooks of composition. In G. D. Little & M. Montgomery (Eds.), Centennial usage studies (pp. 129-137). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press for the American Dialect Society.
38. Milroy, J., & Milroy, L. (1985). Authority in language: Investigating language prescription and standardisation. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
39. Mittins, W. H., Salu, M., Edminson, N., & Coyne, S. (1970). Attitudes to English usage. London: Oxford University Press.
40. Moss, F. K. (1995). Perceptions of communication in the corporate community. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 9, 63-76.
41. Nevalainen, T. (1993). Language change announced? English Today, 9(2), 25-27.
42. Nickel, G., & Stalker, J. C. (1986). Introduction. In G. Nickel & J. C. Stalker (Eds.), Problems of standardization and linguistic variation in present day English (pp. 1-4). Heidelberg, Germany: Julius Groos Verlag.
43. Noguchi, R. R. (1991). Grammar and the teaching of writing: Limits and possibilities. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
44. Nunberg, G. (1990). What the usage panel thinks. In C. Ricks & L. Michaels (Eds.), The state of the language (pp. 467-482). Los Angeles: University of California Press.
45. Pinker, S. (1994a). Grammar puss: The fallacies of the language mavens. The New Republic, 210(5), 19-26.
46. Pinker, S. (1994b). The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: William Morrow.
47. Rogers, P. S., & Rymer, J. (2001). Analytical tools to facilitate transitions into new writing contexts: A communicative perspective. The Journal of Business Communication, 38, 112-152.
48. Shaughnessy, M. P. (1977). Errors and expectations: A guide for the teacher of basic writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
49. Shuman, R. B. (1995). Grammar for writers: How much is enough? In H. Hunter & R. Wallace (Eds.), The place of grammar in writing instruction (pp.114-128). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
50. Simon, J. I. (1980). Paradigms lost: Reflections on literacy and its decline. New York: C. N. Potter.
51. Sklar, E. S. (1988). The tribunal of use: Agreement in indefinite constructions. College Composition and Communication, 39, 410-422.
52. Sledd, J. (1986). Permanence and change in standard American English: The making of "literacy crises." In G. Nickel & J. C. Stalker (Eds.), Problems of standardization and linguistic variation in present day English (pp. 61-70). Heidelberg, Germany: Julius Groos Verlag.
53. Sledd, J., & Ebbit, W. R. (Eds.). (1962). Dictionaries and THAT dictionary. Chicago: Scott, Foresman.
54. Spilka, R. (1993). Influencing workplace practice: A challenge for professional writing specialists in academia. In R. Spilka (Ed.), Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives (pp. 207-219). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
55. Stalker, J. C. (1985a). Attitudes toward language in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. In S. Greenbaum (Ed.), The English language today (pp. 41-47). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
56. Stalker, J. C. (1985b) Language as symbol in the death-of-language books. In S. Greenbaum (Ed.), The English language today (pp. 65-71). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
57. Tannen, D. (1982). Oral and literature strategies in spoken and written narratives. Language, 58, 1-21.
58. Wardhaugh, R. (1999). Proper English: Myths and misunderstandings about language. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
59. Wardrope, W. J., & Bayless, M. L. (1999). Content of the business communication course: An analysis of coverage. Business Communication Quarterly, 62(4), 33-40.
60. Warfel, H. R. (1952). Who killed grammar? Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press.
61. Williams, J. (1981). The phenomenology of error. College Composition and Communication, 32, 152-168.
62. Williams, J. (2000). Style: Ten lessons in clarity and grace (6th ed). New York: Longman.
63. Wilson, K. G. (1987). Van Winkle's return: Changes in American English, 1966-1986. Hanover: University Press of New England.