Process-based measures of creative problem-solving skills: III. Category selection

Creativity Research Journal

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 395-406

  Mumford, Michael D ^a,c   Supinski, Elizabeth P ^b   Victoria Threlfall, K ^b   Baughman, Wayne A ^a  

^a American Institutes for Research

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040919792     PISSN: 10400419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15326934crj0904_11     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357-376.
2. Barsalou, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory and Cognition, 11, 211-227.
3. Barsalou, L. W. (1991). Deriving categories to achieve goals. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 126-141). New York: Academic.
4. Baughman, W. A., & Mumford, M. D. (1995). Process-analytic models of creative capacities: Operations influencing the combination-and-reorganization process. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 37-62.
5. Bejar, I. I., Chaffin, R., & Embretson, S. (1991). Cognitive and psychometric analysis of analogical problem-solving. New York: Springer-Verlag.
6. Carlson, W. B., & Gorman, M. E. (1992). Cognitive framework to understand technological creativity: Bell, Edison, and the telephone. In R. J. Weber & D. N. Perkins (Eds.), Inventive minds: Creativity in technology (pp. 48-79). New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Chi, M. T., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
8. Chi, M. T., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. (1987). Nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
9. Crouch, T. D. (1992). Why Wilbur and Orville? Some thoughts on the Wright brothers and the process of invention. In R. J. Weber & D. N. Perkins (Eds.), Inventive minds: Creativity in technology (pp. 80-92). New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Sawyer, K. (1995). Creative insight: The social dimension of a solitary moment. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 329-364). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Davidson, J. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (1984). The role of insight in intellectual giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 58-64.
12. Finke, R. A. (1995). Creative insight and preinventive forms. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 255-280). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Simonton, D. K. (1990). Psychology, science & history: An introduction to historiometry. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15. Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Synopsis of a triarchic theory of human intelligence. In S. H. Irvine & S. E. Newstead (Eds.), Intelligence and cognition (pp. 161-221). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Nijhoff.
16. Sternberg, R. J. (1988). A three-facet model of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 125-147). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). An investment perspective on creative insight. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 535-558). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Tyler, L. E. (1965). The psychology of human differences. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
19. Ward, S. L., Byrnes, J. P., & Overton, W. F. (1990). Organization of knowledge and conditional reasoning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 832-837.