Validities of unit-weighted composites of the ASVAB and the ECAT battery

Military Psychology

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 77-84

  Held, Janet D ^a   Wolfe, John H ^a  

^a LAC+USC Medical Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009340778     PISSN: 08995605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327876mp0901_4     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Abrahams, N. M., Kieckhaefer, W. F., Cole, D. R., Alf, E. F., Pass, J. J., & Walton-Paxton, E. (1994). Classification utility of test composites from the ASVAB, CAT-ASVAB, and ECAT batteries (Contract No. N66001-90-D-9502, DO 7J16). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
2. Alderton, D. L., Wolfe, J. H., & Larson, G. E. (1997/this issue). The ECAT battery. Military Psychology, 9, 5-37.
3. Brogden, H. E. (1955). Least squares estimates and optimal classification. Psychometrika, 29, 249-252.
4. Busciglio, H. H. (1990). The incremental validity of spatial and perceptual-psychomotor tests relative to the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (Tech. Rep. No. ARI 883). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. (NTIS No. AD-A220903)
5. Busciglio, H. H. (1991). The usefulness of the Project A spatial tests for predicting comprehensive performance measure (Research Note No. ARI 91-17). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. (NTIS No. AD-A232069)
6. Carey, N. B. (1994). Computer predictors of mechanical job performance: Marine Corps findings. Military Psychology, 6, 1-30.
7. Dawes, R. M., & Corrigan, B. (1974). Linear models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 95-106.
8. Hedge, J. W., Carter, G. W., Borman, W. C., Monzon, R. I., & Foley, P. P. (1992). Evaluation of Navy operational and alternative Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) composites. (Contract N66001-90-D-9507, Institute Rep. No. 216). Minneapolis, MN: Personnel Decisions Research Institutes.
9. Johnson, C. D., & Zeidner, J. (1991). The economic benefits of predicting job performance: Vol. 2. Classification efficiency. New York: Praeger.
10. Kieckhaefer, W. F., Ward, D. G., Kusulas, J. W., Cole, D. R., Rupp, L. M., & May, M. H. (1992). Criterion development for 18 technical training schools in the Navy, Army, and Air Force (Contract No. N66001-90-D-9502, DO 7J08). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
11. McHenry, J. J., Hough, L. M., Toquam, J. L., Hanson, M. A., & Ashworth, S. (1990). Project A validity results: The relationship between predictor and criterion domains. Personnel Psychology, 43, 335-354.
12. Schmidt, F. L. (1971). The relative efficiency of regression and simple unit predictor weights in applied differential psychology. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 699-714.
13. Smith, E. P., & Walker, M. R. (1988). Testing psychomotor and spatial abilities to improve selection of TOW gunners. In A. C. F. Gilbert (Ed.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Military Testing Association (pp. 647-652). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. (NTIS No. AD-A215179)
14. Wolfe, J. H. (1997/this issue). Incremental validity of ECAT battery factors. Military Psychology, 9, 49-76.
15. Wolfe, J. H., Alderton, D. L., Larson, G. E., & Held, J. D. (1995). Incremental validity of Enhanced Computer-Administered Testing (ECAT) (Rep. No. TN 96-6). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center. (NTIS No. AD-A307708)
16. Zeidner, J., & Johnson, C. D. (1991a). The economic benefits of predicting job performance: Vol. 1. Selection utility. New York: Praeger.
17. Zeidner, J., & Johnson, C. D. (1991b). The economic benefits of predicting job performance: Vol. 3. Estimating the gains of alternative policies. New York: Praeger.
18. Zeidner, J., & Johnson, C. D. (1994). Is personnel classification a concept whose time has passed? In M. G. Rumsey, C. B. Walker, & J. H. Harris (Eds.), Personnel selection and classification: New directions (pp. 377-410). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.