Incremental validity of ECAT battery factors

Military Psychology

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 49-76

  Wolfe, John H ^a,b  

^a Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Pacific   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002784725     PISSN: 08995605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327876mp0901_3     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Abrahams, N. M., Pass, J. J., Kusulas, J. W., Cole, D. R., & Kieckhaefer, W. F. (1993). Incremental validity of experimental computerized tests for predicting training criteria in military technical schools (Contract No. N66001-90-D-9502, DO 7J13). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
2. Alderton, D. L., Wolfe, J. H., & Larson, G. E. (1997/this issue). The ECAT battery. Military Psychology, 9, 5-37.
3. Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980). Regression diagnostics. New York: Wiley.
4. Carey, N. B. (1994). Computer predictors of mechanical job performance: Marine Corps findings. Military Psychology, 6, 1-30.
5. Ezekiel, M. (1930). Methods of correlational analysis. New York: Wiley.
6. Fisher, R. (1932). Statistical methods for research workers (4th ed.). London: Oliver & Boyd.
7. Grafton, F., Czarnolewski, M. Y., & Smith, E. P. (1989). Relationship between Project A psychomotor and spatial tests and TOW2 gunnery performance: A preliminary investigation (Rep. No. ARI-WP-RS-89-1). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
8. Gulliksen, H. (1987). Theory of mental tests. New York: Wiley. (Original work published 1950)
9. Hedges, L. V., Becker, B. J., & Wolfe, J. H. (1992). Detecting and measuring improvements in validity (Rep. No. TR-93-2). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center. (NTIS No. AD-A257446)
10. Kieckhaefer, W. F., Ward, D. G., Kusulas, J. W., Cole, D. R., Rupp, L. M., & May, M. H. (1992). Criterion development for 18 technical training schools in the Navy, Army, and Air Force (Contract No. N66001-90-D-9502, DO 7J08). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
11. Lawley, D. (1943). A note on Karl Pearson's selection formulae. Royal Society of Edinburgh Proceedings, Section A, 62, 28-30.
12. McHenry, J. J., Hough, L. M., Toquam, J. L., Hanson, M. A., & Ashworth, S. (1990). Project A validity results: The relationship between predictor and criterion domains. Personnel Psychology, 43, 335-354.
13. Reynolds, D.H., Barnes, J. D., Harris, D. A., & Harris, J. H. (1992). Analysis and clustering of entry-level Navy ratings (Final Rep. No. FR-PRD-92-20). Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Research Organization.
14. Reynolds, D. H., Laabs, G. J., & Harris, D. A. (1996). Occupational genealogies: Using job family characteristics in personnel research. Military Psychology, 8, 195-217.
15. Schmidt, F., Dunn, W., & Hunter, J. (1995). Potential utility increases from adding new tests to the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) (Rep. No. TN-95-5). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center. (NTIS No. AD-A279580, Original contractor's report 1987)
16. Smith, E. P., & Graham, S. E. (1987). Validation of psychomotor and perceptual predictors of Armor Officer M-I gunnery performance (Tech. Rep. No. ARI 766). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. (NTIS No. AD-A191333)
17. Smith, E. P., & Walker, M. R. (1988). Testing psychomotor and spatial abilities to improve selection of TOW gunners. In A. C. F. Gilbert (Ed.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Military Testing Association (pp. 647-652). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. (NTIS No. AD-A215179)
18. Technical Advisory Selection Panel. (1989). Report of Technical Advisory Selection Panel. Unpublished manuscript (Memorandum to CAT-ASVAB Working Group).
19. Wolfe, J. H. (1988). Future tests: Design for validation in ten Navy schools. In A. C. F. Gilbert (Ed.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Military Testing Association (pp. 463-468). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. (NTIS No. AD-A215179)
20. Wolfe, J. H., & Alderton, D. L. (1992). Navy incremental validity study of new predictors. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Military Testing Association (Vol. 1, pp. 39-44). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center. (NTIS No. AD-A268815)
21. Wolfe, J. H., Alderton, D. L., & Larson, G. E. (1993). Incremental validity of new computerized aptitude tests for predicting training performance in nine Navy technical schools. Unpublished manuscript.
22. Wolfe, J. H., Alderton, D. L., Larson, G. E., & Held, J. D. (1995). Incremental validity of Enhanced Computer-Administered Testing (ECAT) (Rep. No. TN 96-6). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center. (NTIS No. AD-A307708)