Research news and comment: Response: A system of expert panels and design competitions: Complementary federal approaches to find, develop, and share promising and exemplary products and programs

Educational Researcher

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 12-20

  Klein, Susan S ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009238268     PISSN: 0013189X     EISSN: 1935102X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X026006012     Document Type: Note

References (33)

1. Backer, T (February, 1995). Readiness for change, educational innovations, and educational reform. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education. (Human Interaction Research Institute).
2. Barkdoll, G (1995). Standards and their use in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Washington, DC: OERI. (January 19, 1996).
3. Birman, B, and A O'Malley (1996a). Expert Panel in Mathematics and Science Education: Summary of first panel meeting. Washington, DC: OERI. (July 25, 1996, draft, Pelavin Research Institute).
4. Birman, B, and A O'Malley (1996b). Expert Panel in Mathematics and Science Education: Summary of the second panel meeting. Washington, DC: OERI. (November 15-16, 1996 draft, Pelavin Research Institute).
5. Birman, B, and A O'Malley (1997). Expert Panel in Mathematics and Science Education: Summary of the third panel meeting. Washington, DC: OERI. (January 27-28, 1997, draft, Pelavin Research Institute).
6. Bodilly, S (1996). Lessons from New American Schools development corporation's demonstration phase. Washington, DC: RAND.
7. Bodilly, S, S Purnell, K Ramsey, and C Smith (1995). Designing New American Schools-baseline observations on nine design teams. Washington, DC: RAND.
8. Bogart, K (1996). Notes on the federal dissemination experts meeting: Advising the Department of Education's Office of Educational Research and Improvement on its design of a systematic consumer-oriented evaluation system to designate promising and exemplary educational products, programs and practices. Washington, DC: Academy for Educational Development. (October 12, 1995).
9. Campbell, PB (1994). Whose knowledge is it?: Involving teachers in the generating and using of information on educational innovations. Washington, DC: OERI. (July 10, 1994).
10. Campbell, PB, and KA Bachmann (November, 1996). First year formative evaluation: The Pilot Gender Equity Expert Panel. Washington, DC: OERI. (Campbell-Kibler Associates, Inc., Groton, MA).
11. Canine, D (1995). Using what we have to get the schools we need: A productivity focus for American education. New York: Consortium on Productivity in the Schools, Institute on Education and the Economy, Teachers College, Columbia University.
12. Datta, L (1994). A matter of consensus. Datta analysis. Washington, DC: OERI. (August, 17, 1994).
13. Datta, L, and M Scriven (1997). Incorporating research findings and practices into expert panel work: A dialog between Michael Scriven (MS) and Loisellin Datta (LD). Washington, DC: OERI. (January 31, 1997).
14. Hanson, K (April, 1996). Concept paper: Gender Equity Expert Panel. Newton, MA: Education Development Center. (Rev. October 1996).
15. Hollifield, J, S Stringfield, and R Herman (1996). Evaluation and standards for school-wide programs and programs conducted in multiple sites. Washington, DC: OERI.
16. Klein, SS (Ed.)(1993). Special feature. Sharing the best: Finding better ways for the federal government to use evaluation to guide the dissemination of promising and exemplary education solutions. Evaluation and Program Planning, 16(3), 209-278.
17. Klein, SS (1995). When school meets science: The role of the U.S. Department of Education in helping educators use the results of research and evaluation. In T Tyden (Ed.), When school meets science (pp. 160-175). Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm Institute of Education Press.
18. Klein, SS (January 15, 1997). The evolving "Findbest" system. Washington, DC: OERI. (Working Document).
19. Klein, SS, and MK Gwaltney (1991). Charting the education dissemination system: Where we are and where we go from here. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 12(3), 241-265.
20. Komoski, PK (1989). Problems with consumer information in education. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 11(1), 51-57.
21. Lacampagne, C (June, 1996). Concept paper: Expert Panel in Mathematics and Science Education. Washington, DC: OERI.
22. LaFollette, M. (Ed.) (1992). New models for disseminating education R&D. In LaFollette, M (Ed.), Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, Vol. 13(3). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Periodicals Press.
23. Maxwell, J (September, 1996). Guidelines for submitting programs to the Gender Equity Expert Panel for review. Newton: MA: Education Development Center.
24. Muscara, C (1996). A discussion of some U.S. evaluation efforts for programs and resources in mathematics and science. Washington, DC: OERI. (Computer Technology Services, Inc., October 1996).
25. Schmieder, A. (1996, April). OERI leadership efforts in designing approaches to identity and share promising and exemplary products, programs and practices. Notes from an OERI-sponsored meeting before the AERA annual meeting in New York.
26. Scriven, M (1993). Hard-won lessons in program evaluation. In New Directions for Program Evaluation (p. 58).
27. Scriven, M (1995). The logic of evaluation and evaluation practice. In DM Fournier (Ed.), Reasoning in evaluation: Inferential links and leaps. New directions for program evaluation, Vol. 68 (pp. 49-70). San Francisco: Jossey-Ball Publishers.
28. Seidman, P (1997). Expert panels for promising and exemplary innovations: A fine idea from the feds. NCRVE Centerwork, 1(1), 5-7.
29. Slavin, RE (1997a). Design competitions: A proposal for a new federal role in educational research and development. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 22-28.
30. Slavin, R. E. (1997b). Reading by nine: A comprehensive strategy. Manuscript in preparation.
31. Standards for Conduct and Evaluation of Activities Carried out by the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI)-Designation of Exemplary and Promising Programs: Proposed Rules. 34 C.F.R. Part 701 (June 3, 1996, Federal Register).
32. Turnbull, B (March, 1996). Technical assistance and the creation of educational knowledge. Washington, DC: OERI. (Policy Studies Associates).
33. U.S. Department of Education (December, 1994). Strategic plan for the U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: Author. (Working Document).