Changing Teacher Behavior Through Staff Development: Implementing the Teaching and Content Standards in Science

School Science and Mathematics

Volumn 97, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 302-310

  Gibbons, Siobhan ^a   Kimmel, Howard ^a   O'Shea, Mark ^b  

^a NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b METROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY OF DENVER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0008660950     PISSN: 00366803     EISSN: 19498594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1997.tb17279.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Anderson, R.D., & Mitchener, C.P. (1994). Research on science education. In D.L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Science Teaching and Learning p. 3–44. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
2. Bandura, A., and Adams, N.E. (1977). Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
3. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147.
4. Cuban, L. (1979). Determinants of curriculum change and stability, 1870–1970. In J.R. Gress & D.E. Purpel (Eds.), Curriculum: An Introduction to the Field Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
5. Crawley, F.E., & Koballa, T.R. (1992). Attitude/behavior change in science education: Part I - Models and methods Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston, MA.
6. Goldfried, M. R., & Robins, C. (1982). On the facilitation of self-efficacy. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 6, 361–380.
7. Guskey, T.R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15, 5–12.
8. Haney, J., Czerniak, C., & Lumpe, A. (1996). Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 971–993.
9. Huinker, D. (1996). Teaching mathematics and science in urban elementary schools. School Science and Mathematics, 96 (7), 340–348.
10. Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1983). Power in staff development through research on training Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
11. Joyce, B. & Showers, B. (1988). Student achievement through staff development New York: Longman.
12. Lesh, R. (1996). Report of the technical assistance team to the New Jersey SSI Unpublished internal report, Rutgers University, New Brunswick.
13. Locke, E.A., Frederick, E., Lee, C. and Bobko, P. (1984). Effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 241–251.
14. Loucks-Horsley, S., Carlson, M. O., Brink, L. H., Horwitz, P., Marsh, D. P., Pratt, H., Roy, K. R., & Worth, K., (1989). Developing and supporting teachers for elementary school science education Washington, DC: The National Center for Improving Science Education.
15. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16. National Staff Development Council. (1994). Standards for staff development Oxford, OH: Author.
17. New Jersey Department of Education. (1996). Core Curriculum Content Standards Trenton, NJ: Author.
18. O'Brien, T. (1992). Science inservice workshops that work for elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 92, 422–426.
19. Reys, B.J., Reys, R.E., Barnes, D., Beem, J., & Papick, I. (1997). Collaborative curriculum investigation as a vehicle for teacher enhancement and mathematics curriculum reform. School Science and Mathematics, 97, 253–259.
20. Schumm, J.S., Vaughn, S., Gordon, J., & Rothlein, L. (1994). General education teachers' beliefs, skills, and practices in planning for mainstreamed students with learning disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17, 22–37.
21. Sparks, G. (1983). Synthesis of research on staff development for effective teaching. Educational Leadership, 41 (3), 65–72.