The Liverpool Delphi evaluation (multiple letters) [1]

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 237, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 259-260

  Gonzalez De La Rosa M ^a  

^a NONE   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FOLLOW UP; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LETTER; MASS SCREENING; OPTIC NERVE FIBER; PERIMETRY; POLARIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPY; SCOTOMA; THICKNESS;

EID: 0008156745     PISSN: 0721832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s004170050228     Document Type: Letter

References (26)

1. Asman P, Heijl A, Olsson J, Rootzén H (1992) Spatial analyses of glaucomatous visual fields: a comparison with traditional visual field indices. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1992; 70:679-686
2. Chandramohan S, Khanna S, Ali B, Coleman A, Bake RS, Wilson MR (1996) Comparison of Normative versus Non-normative based Methodology of Visual Field Analysys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Suppl ARVO 37:2318
3. Cordoves L, González de la Rosa M, Morales J (1996) MD reproducibility with 30-2 and Delphi programs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Suppl ARVO 37:2310
4. Cunliffe IA, Pacey IE, Wild JM, Sedgewick G, O'Neill EC (1998) The validity and reproducibility of the Sita Standard and Sita Fast Thresholds algorithms in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Suppl ARVO 39:111
5. Flanagan J, Wild J, Trope G (1993) Evaluation of FASTPAC, a new strategy for thresholds estimation with the Humphrey field analyzer, in a glaucomatous population. Ophthalmology 100:949-954
6. Fujimoto N, Kakinuma T, Adachi-Usami E (1998) Fatigue and fluctuation in Sita Standard and Full-Thresholds perimetry of Humphrey Analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Suppl ARVO 39:2256
7. García Feijoo J (1998) Análisis del espesor de la capa de fibras nerviosas de la retina por polarimetría laser. Doctoral thesis. Universidad Complutense, Madrid
8. González de la Rosa M, Losada M, Arias A (1995) The mean deviation in the Delphi and 24-2 perimetric programs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Suppl ARVO 36:1588
9. González de la Rosa M, Martinez A, Sanchez M, Mesa C, Cordovés L, Losada MJ (1997) Accuracy of the Tendency Oriented Perimetry (TOP) in the Octopus 1-2-3 Perimeter. In: Wall M, Heijl A (eds) Perimetry update 1996/ 1997. Kugler, Amsterdam, pp 119-123
10. González de la Rosa M, Pareja A (1997) Influence of the "fatigue effect" on the mean deviation measurement in perimetry. Eur J Ophthalmol 7: 29-34
11. González de la Rosa M, Reyes JA, González Sierra MA (1990) Rapid assessment of the visual field in glaucoma using an analysis based on multiple correlations. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 228:387-391
12. Graham SL, Drance SM (1995) Interpretation of high-pass resolution perimetry with a probability plot. A V Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 233:140-149
13. Gregg C, Morales J, Fox A, Garcia L, Harding D (1996) Evaluation of one-minute perimetry in a glaucoma screening program. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Suppl ARVO 37:2322
14. Krakau CET (1989) Visual field testing with reduced sets of test points. A computerized analysis. Doc Ophthalmol 73:71-80
15. Langerhorst CT, Carenini LL, Bakker D, Bie-Raakman MAC (1996) Use of central 10 degrees threshold measurements for description of very early glaucomatous field defects. XII International Perimetric Society Meeting, Würzburg, June
16. Hel-Harazi SM, Cortes C, Feldman RM (1998) Comparison of the Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) with the Humphrey visual field 30-2. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Suppl ARVO 39:2259
17. Hudson C, Wild JM, O'Neill E (1994) Fatigue effects during a single session of automated static threshold perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35:268-280
18. Johnson CA, Adams CV, Lewis RA (1988) Fatigue effects in automated perimetry. Appl Optics 27:1030-1037
19. Martinez Piñero A, Rodriguez J, Serrano M, González de la Rosa M (1998) Reproducibility and accuracy of Tendency Oriented Perimetry (TOP). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Suppl ARVO 39:95
20. Nordmann JP, Mouton-Chopin D (1998) Evaluation of the SITA Accurate and SITA Fast perimetric algorithms in normal and glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Suppl ARVO 39:2261
21. O'Brien C, Poinoosawmy S, Hitchings R (1994) Evaluation of the Humphrey FASTPAC threshold program in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 78:516-519
22. O'Donnell NP, Birch MK, Wishart PK (1995) Fastpac error is within the long term fluctuation of standard Humphrey Threshold visual field testing. In: Mills RP, Wall M (eds) Perimetry update 1994/95. Kugler, Amsterdam, pp 231-237
23. Panta G, Uva MG, Randazzo DA, Ott JP, Avibitabile T, Reibaldi A (1995) Fastpac reliability on glaucomatous patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Suppl ARVO 36:1585
24. Sample PA, Martinez GA, Weinreb RN (1994) Short-wavelength automated perimetry without lens density testing. Am J Ophthalmol 118:632-641
25. Wishart PK, Wardrop DRA, Kosmin A (1998) Is visual field evaluation using multiple correlation and linear regressions useful? An evaluation of Delphi perimetry. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 236:493-500
26. Zulauf M, Fehlmann P, Flammer J (1995) Efficiency of the standard Octopus bracketing procedure compared to that of the "Dynamic strategy" of Weber. In: Mills RP, Wall M (eds) Perimetry update 1994/95. Kugler, Amsterdam, pp 263-264