Reconstructing familiar metaphors: John Dewey and Louise Rosenblatt on literary art as experience

Research in the Teaching of English

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 9-34

  Faust, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007331205     PISSN: 0034527X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. ALEXANDER, T. (1993). John Dewey's theory of art, experience and nature: The horizons of feeling. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
2. APPLEBEE, A. N. (1974). Tradition and reform in the teaching of English: A history. Urbana, IL: National Council ofTeachers of English.
3. APPLEBEE, A. N. (1993). Literature in the secondary school: Studies of curriculum and instruction in the United States. NCTE Research Report No. 25. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
4. APPLEYARD, J. A. (1990). Becoming a reader: The experience of fiction from childhood to adulthood. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. ATHANASES, S. (1998). Diverse learners, diverse texts: Exploring identity and difference through literary encounters. Journal of Literacy Research, 30, 273-296.
6. BERLEANT, A. (1991). Art and engagement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
7. BLOOME, D., & EGAN-ROBERTSON, A. (1993). The social construction of intertextuality in classroom reading and writing lessons. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 305-333.
8. BOISVERT, R. D. (1998). John Dewey: Rethinking our time. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
9. BOOTH, W. (1988). The company we keep: An ethics of fiction. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
10. BROWN, R. (1978). A poetic for sociology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. CALINESCU, M. (1993). Rereading. New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
12. CLIFFORD, J. (1979). Transactional teaching and the literary experience. English Journal, 68(9), 36-39.
13. COLE, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. DE BEAUGRANDE, R. (1985). Poetry and the ordinary reader: A study of immediate responses. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 3, 1-21.
15. DEWEY, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Berkeley Publishing Group.
16. EARTHMAN, E. A. (1992). Creating the virtual work: Readers' processes in understanding literary texts. Research in the Teaching of English, 26, 351-384.
17. ELBOW, P. (1973). Writing without teachers. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. ENCISO, P. (1998). Good/bad girls read together: Pre-adolescent girl's co-authorship of feminine subject positions during a shared reading event. English Education, 30, 44-62.
19. GADAMER, H. G. (1960/1994). Truth and method. New York: Continuum.
20. GARRISON, J. (Ed.) (1995). The new scholarship on Dewey. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
21. GARRISON, J. (1996). A Deweyan theory of democratic listening. Educational Theory, 46, 429-451.
22. GOLDEN, J. (1992). Inquiries into the nature and construction of literary texts: Theory and method. In R. Beach, J. Green, M. Kamil, & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Multidisciplinary perspectives on literacy research (pp. 275-92). Urbana, IL: National Conference on Research in English and National Council ofTeachers of English.
23. HUNT, R., & VIPOND, J. (1992). First, catch the rabbit: Methodological imperative and the dramatization of dialogic reading. In R. Beach, J. Green, M. Kamil, & T. Shanahan (Eds.). Multidisciplinary perspectives on literacy research (pp. 69-89). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
24. HYNDS, S. (1997). On the brink: Negotiating life and literature with adolescents. New York: Teachers College Press.
25. JOYCE, M. (1995). Siren shapes: Exploratory and constructive hypertexts. In M. Joyce (Ed.), Of two minds: Hypertext pedagogy and poetics (pp. 39-60). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
26. KLINKOWITZ, J. (1993). Rosenberg, Barthes, Hassan: The postmodern habit of thought. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
27. KRAMNICK, I. (Ed.) (1995). The portable enlightenment reader. New York: Penguin.
28. LANGER, J. A. (1990). The process of understanding: Reading for literary and informational purposes. Research in the Teaching of English, 24, 229-260.
29. nd ed.). Boston, MA: Bedford.
30. MAILLOUX, S. (1990). The turns of reader-response criticism. In M. Moran & L. Penfield (Eds.), Conversations: Contemporary critical theory and the teaching of literature (pp. 23-42). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
31. MARSHALL, J. D. (1993). Toward a theory of practice: Readers, texts, and the teaching of literature. In G. E. Newell & R. K. Durst (Eds.), Exploring texts: The role of discussion and writing in the teaching and learning of literature (pp. 307-323). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
32. MARSHALL, J. D., Smagorinsky, P., & Smith, M. W.(1995). The language of interpretation: Patterns of discourse in discussions of literature. NCTE Research Report No. 27. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
33. MCCOY, K. (1997). Killing the father/becoming uncomfortable with the mother tongue: Rethinking the performative contradiction. Educational Theory, 47, 489-500.
34. MORGAN, W. (2000). Electronic tools for dismantling the master's house: Poststructuralist feminist research and hypertext poetics. In E. A. St. Pierre & W. Pillow (Eds.), Working the ruins: Postructural theory and method in education (pp. 130-149). New York: Routledge.
35. MURRAY, D. (1968). A writer teaches writing. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
36. PEARCE, L. (1997). Feminism and the politics of reading. London: Arnold Press.
37. PRADL, G. (1991). Reading literature in a democracy: The challenge of Louise Rosenblatt. In J. Clifford (Ed.), The experience of reading: Louise Rosenblatt and reader-response theory (pp. 23-46). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
38. PRADL, G. (1994). Imagining literature at the point of utterance. In B. Corcoran, G. Pradl, & M. Hayhoe (Eds.). Knowledge in the making: Challenging the text in the classroom (pp. 223-244). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
39. PRATT, M. (1991). Arts of the contact zones. Profession, 23, 235-253.
40. RABINOWITZ, P., & SMITH, M. W. (1998). Authorizing readers: Resistance and respect in the teaching of literature. New York & Urbana, IL: Teachers College Press & National Council of Teachers of English.
41. th ed.). New York: Modern Language Association.
42. nd ed.). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
43. ROSENBLATT, L. (1985). Transaction versus interaction: A terminological rescue operation. Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 96-107.
44. ROSENBLATT, L. (1993). The transactional theory: Against dualisms. College English, 55, 377-386.
45. ROSENBLATT, L. (1995). Continuing the conversation: A clarification. Research in the Teaching of English, 29, 349-354.
46. SCHOLES, R. (1989). Protocols of reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
47. SCHWEICKART, P. (1986). Reading ourselves: Toward a feminist theory of reading. In E. Flynn & P. Schweickart (Eds.), Gender and reading: Essays on readers, texts, and contexts (pp. 31-62). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
48. SHERIDAN, D. (1993). Changing business as usual: Reader response in the classroom. College English, 53, 804-814.
49. SHUSTERMAN, R. (1992). Pragmatist aesthetics: Living beauty, rethinking art. Oxford, U.K.: Basil Blackwell.
50. SLEEPER, R. W. (1986). The necessity of pragmatism: John Dewey's conception of philosophy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
51. SULLIVAN, M. A. (1995). Reader response, contemporary aesthetics, and the adolescent reader. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 29, 79-93.
52. SMAGORINSKY, P., & O'DONNELL-ALLEN, C. (1998). Reading as mediated and mediating action: Composing meaning for literature through multimedia interpretive texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 198-226.
53. SUMARA, D. (1996). Private readings in public: Schooling the literary imagination. New York: Peter Lang.
54. TAXEL, J. (1991). Roll of thunder, hear my cry: Reflections on the aesthetics and politics of children's literature. In G. Willis & W. H. Schubert (Eds.), Reflections from the heart of educational inquiry: Understanding curriculum and teaching through the arts (pp. 301-311). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
55. TCHUDI, S. N., & TCHUDI, S. J. (1991). The English/ language arts handbook: Classroom strategies for teachers. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
56. THOMSON, J. (1987). Understanding teenagers' reading. Norwood, AU: Australian Association for the Teaching of English.
57. VINE, H., & FAUST, M. (1993). Situating readers: Students making meaning of literature. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
58. VYGOTSKY, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
59. VYGOTSKY, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In L. S. Vygotsky, Collected works (vol. 1, pp. 39-285) (R. Rieber & A. Carton, Eds; N. Minick, Trans.). New York: Plenum.
60. WERTSCH, J. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61. WILHELM, J. D. (1997). "You gotta BE the book": Teaching engaged and reflective reading with adolescents. New York & Urbana, IL: Teachers College Press & National Council of Teachers of English.
62. WILLIAMS, R. (1983). Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society (Rev. ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
63. WILLINSKY, J. (1991). The triumph of literature/the fate of literacy: English in the secondary school curriculum. New York:Teachers College Press.
64. WIMSATT, W., & BEARDSLEY, M. (1949). The affective fallacy. In G. Stallman (Ed.), Critiques and essays in criticism: 1920-1948 (pp. 401-411). New York: Ronald Press.