Gender gap linked to differential socialization for high-achieving senior mathematics students

Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 91, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 140-147

  Campbell, James R ^a   Beaudry, Jeffrey S ^b  

^a ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007143967     PISSN: 00220671     EISSN: 19400675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220679809597534     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. American Association of University Women. (1991). Shortchanging girls, shortchanging America. Washington, DC: Greenberg Lake.
2. Benbow, C., & Stanley, J. (1983a). Differential course-taking hypothesis revisited. American Educational Research Journal, 20(4), 469-473.
3. Ben bow, C., & Stanley, J. (1983b). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: More facts. Science. 222(4627), 1029-1031.
4. Campbell, J. R. (1991). The roots of gender inequity in technical areas. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(3), 251-264.
5. Campbell, J. R. (1993). The socio-psychological piano—the differential socialization metaphor: Applications across ethnic groups and countries. Unpublished manuscript.
6. Campbell, J. R., & Beaudry, J. (1992). Social and psychological factors relating to mathematics and science achievement: Findings from the Longitudinal Study of American Youth 1997-1989. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
7. Campbell, J. R., & Connolly, C. (1984). Winners of the Westinghouse Talent Search. Unpublished manuscript.
8. Campbell, J. R., & Mandel, F. (1990). Connecting mathematics achievement to parental influences. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15, 64-74.
9. Campbell, J. R., & Uto, Y. (1994). Educated fathers and mothers have differential effects on overseas Japanese boys’ and girls’ mathematics achievement. International Journal of Educational Research. 21(1), 697-704.
10. Campbell, J. R., & Wu, R. (1994). Gifted Chinese girls get the best mix of family processes to bolster their mathematics achievement. International Journal of Educational Research, 21(1), 685-696.
11. Dossey, J., Mullis, I., Lindquist, M., & Chambers, D. L. (1988). The mathematics report card: Are we measuring up? Trends and achievement based on the 19H6 national assessment. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
12. Eccles, J. (1982). Sex differences in achievement patterns. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Washington, DC.
13. Eccles, J., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies values and academic behaviors. In J. Spence (Ed), Achievement and achievement motivation. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
14. Eccles, J., & Jacobs, J. (1986). Social forces shape mathematics attitudes and performance. Signs Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 11, 367-380.
15. Feingold, A. (1992a). Sex differences in variability in intellectual abilities: A new look at an old controversy. Review of Educational Research. 62(1). 61-84.
16. Feingold, A. (1992b). The greater male variability controversy. Review of Educational Research, 62(1), 89-90.
17. Fennema, E. (1983). Final report, research on relationship of spatial visualization and confidence to male/female mathematics achievement in grades 6-8. Washington. DC: National Science Foundation.
18. Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. (1977). Sex related differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization and affective factors. American Educational Research Journal, 14(1), 51-71.
19. Flouris, G (1989). Parental influence, self-concept and achievement: A national study. Athens: Grigoris.
20. Flouris, G., Calogiannakis-Hourdakis, P., Spiridakis, J., & Campbell, J. R. Tradition and socio-economic status are Greek keys to academic success. International Journal of Educational Research, 21(1). 705-712.
21. Fox, L. H., Tobin, D., & Brody, L. (1979). Sex-role socialization and achievement in mathematics. In M. Wittig & A. Peterson (Eds.), Sex- related differences in cognitive functioning: Developmental issues. San Diego: Academic Press.
22. Friedman, L. (1989). Mathematics and the gender gap: A meta-analysis of recent studies on sex differences in mathematical tasks. Review of Educational Research,.59(2). 185-213.
23. Hedges, L. V. (1986). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. American Educational Research Association Presession. San Francisco.
24. Linn, M. (1986). Meta-analysis of studies of gender differences: implications and future directions. In J. Hyde & M. Linn (Eds.), The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis. Baltimore. MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
25. Linn, M. (1989). Gender, mathematics and science. Educational Researcher, 18(8) 17-27.
26. Meece, J., Parsons, J., Kazzala, C., Goff, S., & Futterman, R. (1982). Sex differences in mathematics achievement: Toward a model of academic choice. Psychological Bulletin, 91. 324-348.
27. Miller, J. (1989). The development of participatory citizenship attitudes: The relative influence of family and peers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
28. National Science Board. (1987). Science & engineering indicators. Washington. DC.
29. Page, E. B. (1976). A historical step beyond Terman. in D. Keating (Ed.). Intellectual talent: Research and development. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
30. Page, G. T., & Thomas, J. B. (1977). International dictionary of education. New York: Nichols.
31. Sellin, N. (1983). PLSPath—Version 4. Estimating latent variable path models by partial least squares. Unpublished program manual.
32. Sellin, N. (1989). PLSPath version 3.01: Application manual. Hamburg. Germany.
33. Sells, L. (1978). Mathematics: A critical filter. The Science Teacher. 45(2), 28-29.