Are audit program plans risk-adjusted?

Auditing

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 55-74

  Mock, Theodore J ^a   Wright, Arnold M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Audit evidential planning; Audit risk; Program planning

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007075421     PISSN: 02780380     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2308/aud.1999.18.1.55     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 1983. Audit Risk and Materiality in Conducting an Audit. Statement on Auditing Standards No. 47. New York, NY: AICPA.
2. _. 1988a. The Auditor's Responsibility to Detect and Report Errors and Irregularities. Statement on Auditing Standards No. 53. New York, NY: AICPA.
3. _. 1988b. Consideration of the Internal Control Structure in a Financial Statement Audit. Statement on Auditing Standards No. 55. New York, NY: AICPA.
4. _. 1988c. The Auditor's Consideration of an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. Statement on Auditing Standards No. 59. New York, NY: AICPA.
5. Amemiya, T. 1985. Advanced Econometrics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Bedard, J. 1989. Archival investigation of audit program planning. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory (Fall): 57-71.
7. _, and A. Wright. 1994. The functionality of decision heuristics: Reliance on prior audit adjustments in evidential planning. Behavioral Research In Accounting (Supplement): 62-89.
8. _, and _. 1998. Auditors' adaptive behavior in evidential planning. Working paper, Northeastern University.
9. Bell, T., Knechel, R., and J. Willingham. 1994. An exploratory analysis of the determinants of audit engagement resource allocations. Proceedings of Deloitte & Touche/University of Kansas Symposium on Auditing Problems. Lawrence, KS: 49-67.
10. Biggs, S., T. Mock, and P. Watkins. 1988. Auditor's use of analytical review in audit program design. The Accounting Review (January): 148-161.
11. Carcello, J., and Z. Palmrose. 1994. Auditor litigation and modified reporting on bankrupt clients. Journal of Accounting Research (Supplement): 1-30.
12. Cushing, B., L. Graham, Z. Palmrose, R. Roussey, and I. Solomon. 1995. Risk orientation. In Auditing Practice, Research, and Education: A Productive Collaboration, edited by T. Bell, and A. Wright, 11-54. New York, NY: AICPA.
13. Davidson, R., and W. Gist. 1996. Empirical evidence on the functional relation between audit planning and total audit effort. Journal of Accounting Research (Spring): 111-124.
14. De Jong, P., and R. Thompson. 1990. Testing linear hypotheses in the SUR framework with identical explanatory variables. Research in Finance: 59-76.
15. DiPietro, J., T. Mock, and A. Wright. 1994. An investigation of adaptability in evidential planning. Proceedings of Symposium on Auditing Problems XII. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas.
16. Hackenbrack, K., and R. Knechel. 1997. Resource allocation decisions in audit engagements. Conemporary Accounting Research (Fall): 481-499.
17. Hill, M. 1995. Auditor evidential planning judgments: Experimental evidence on response to error information. Working paper, University of Georgia.
18. Johnson, E. N., K. B. Walker, and E. Westergaard. 1995. Supplier concentration and pricing of audit services in New Zealand. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory (Fall): 74-89.
19. Kennedy, J., and M. Peecher. 1997. Judging auditors' technical knowledge. Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn): 279-293.
20. Kreutzfeldt, R., and W. Wallace. 1986. Error characteristics in audit populations: Their profile and relationship to environmental factors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory (Fall): 20-43.
21. Lys, R., and R. Watts. 1994. Lawsuits against auditors. Journal of Accounting Research (Supplement): 65-93.
22. Marquandt, D. 1980. You should standardize the predictor variables in your regression models. Discussion of: A critique of some ridge regression methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association: 87-91.
23. Mock, T., and A. Wright. 1993. An exploratory study of auditor evidential planning. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory (Fall): 39-61.
24. O'Keefe, T., D. Simunic, and M. Stein. 1994. The production of audit services: evidence from a major public accounting firm. Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn): 241-261.
25. Pratt, J., and. J. Stice. 1994. The effects of client characteristics on auditor litigation risk judgments, required audit evidence, and recommended audit fees. The Accounting Review (October): 639-656.
26. Quadackers, L., T. Mock, and S. Maijoor. 1996. Audit risk and audit programs: Archival evidence from four Dutch audit firms. The European Accounting Review: 217-237.
27. Schipper, K., and R. Thompson. 1983. The impact of merger-related regulations on shareholders of acquiring firms. Journal of Accounting Research: 184-221.
28. _, _, and R. Weil. 1987. Disentangling interrelated effects of regulatory changes on sharehold wealth: The case of motor carrier regulation. Journal of Law and Economics (April): 67-100.
29. Solomon, I., and M. Shields. 1995. Judgment and decision-making research in auditing. In Judgment and Decision-Making Research in Accounting and Auditing, edited by R. Ashton, and A. Ashton, 137-175. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
30. Smith, J., and T. Kida. 1991. Heuristics and biases: Expertise and task realism in auditing. Psychological Bulletin (May): 472-489.
31. Srivastava, R. P., and G. R. Shafer. 1992. Belief-function formulas for audit risk. The Accounting Review (April): 249-283.
32. _, S. Dutta, and R. Johns. 1996. An expert system approach to audit planning and evaluation in the belief-function framework. International Journal of Expert Systems: 32-61.
33. Stein, M., D. Simunic, and T. O'Keefe. 1994. Industry differences in the production of audit services. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory (Supplement): 128-142.
34. Wallace, W. 1989. Are audit fees sufficiently risk adjusted? Advances in Accounting: 3-37.
35. Waller, W. 1993. Auditors' assessments of inherent and control risk in field settings. The Accounting Review (October): 783-803.
36. Wright, A. 1988. The impact of prior working papers on auditor evidential planning judgments. Accounting, Organizations and Society: 595-605.
37. _. and R. H. Ashton. 1989. Identifying audit adjustments with attention-directing procedures. The Accounting Review (October): 710-728.
38. _, and S. Wright. 1997. The effect of industry experience on hypothesis generation and audit planning decisions. Behavioral Research in Accounting: 273-294.
39. Zellner, A. 1962. An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association (June): 348-368.