Sexual harassment and gender differences

Journal of Social Behavior and Personality

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 235-252

  Hendrix, William H ^a   Rueb, Justin D ^a   Steel, Robert P ^a  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032219826     PISSN: 08861641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Baker, D.D., Terpstra, D.E., & Larntz, K. (1990). The influence of individual characteristics and severity of harassing behavior on reaction to sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 22, 305-325.
2. Bursik, L. (1992). Perceptions of sexual harassment in an academic context. Sex Roles, 27, 410-412.
3. Bass, D. (1994). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York: Basic Books.
4. Crooks, R., & Baur, K. (1993). Our sexuality (5th ed.). Redwood City, CA: Benjamin/Cummins.
5. Doughtery, T.W., Turban, D.B., Olson, D.E., Dwyer, P.D., & Lapreze, M. W. (1996). Factors affecting perceptions of workplace sexual harassment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 489-501.
6. Ellison v. Brady (54 FEP Cases 1347, 1991, USCA, 9TH Circ.)
7. Fitzgerald, L.F., & Hesson-McInnis, M. (1989). The dimensions of sexual harassment: A structural analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 35, 309-326.
8. Fitzgerald, L.F., & Ormerod, A.J. (1991). Perceptions of sexual harassment: The influence of gender and academic context. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 281-294.
9. Fitzgerald, L.F., & Shullman, S.L. (1988). The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32, 152-175.
10. Fitzgerald, L.F., & Shullman, S.L. (1993). Sexual harassment: A research analysis and agenda for the 1990s. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 5-27.
11. Gruber, J.E. (1992). A typology of personal and environmental sexual harassment: Research and policy implications for the 1990's. Sex Roles, 26, 447-464.
12. Gutek, B.A. (1985). Sex and the workplace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. Gutek, B.A., Morasch, B., & Cohen, A. G. (1983). Interpreting social-sexual behavior in a work setting. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 22, 30-48.
14. Hanisch, K.A. (1996). An integrated framework for studying the outcomes of sexual harassment: Consequences for individuals and organizations. In M.S. Stockdale (Vol. Ed.) Sexual harassment in the workplace (Vol. 5, pp. 174-198). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
15. Harnett, J.J., Robinson, D., & Singh, B. (1989). Perceptions of males and females toward sexual harassment and acquiescence. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 4, 291-298.
16. Icenogle, M.L., Eagle, B.W., Weldy, T.G., & Hanks, L.A. (1996). A field study of employee knowledge of sexual harassment: What employees know and don't know about sexual harassment. Paper presented at the 1996 Southern Management Association meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana.
17. Knapp, D.E., Faley, R.H., Ekeberg, S.E., DuBois, C.L.Z. (1997). Determinants of target responses to sexual harassment: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 22(3), 687-729.
18. Katz, R.C., Hannon, R., & Whitten, L. (1996). Effects of gender and situation on the perception of sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 34, 35-42.
19. Kelley, H. H, & Michela, J. (1984). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 457-502.
20. Leap, T.L., & Crino, M.D. (1993). Personnel/human resource management. New York: Macmillian.
21. Marks, M.A., & Nelson, E.S. (1993). Sexual harassment on campus: Effects of professor gender on perception of sexually harassing behaviors. Sex Roles, 28, 207-217.
22. Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson (106 S.Ct. 2399, 1986)
23. Popovich, P.M., Gehlauf, D.N., Jolton, J.A, Everton, W.J., Godinho, R.M., Mastrangelo, P.M., & Somers, J.M. (1996). Physical attractiveness and sexual harassment: Does every picture tell a story or every story draw a picture? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 520-542.
24. Popovich, P.M., Jolton, J.A., Mastrangelo, P.M., Everton, W, J., & Somers, J.M. (1995). Sexual harassment scripts: A means to understand a phenomenon. Sex Roles, 32, 315-335.
25. Pryor, J. (1985). The lay person's understanding of sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 13, 273-286.
26. Reilly, M.E., Lott, B., & Gallogly, S.M. (1986). Sexual harassment of university students. Sex Roles, 15, 333-358.
27. Robinson v. Jacksonville Shipyards (54 FEP Cases 83, 1988, DC Mfla)
28. Shea, M. (1993). The effects of selective evaluation on the perception of female cues in sexually coercive and noncoercive males. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 22, 415-432.
29. Stockdale, M.S. (Ed.). (1996). Sexual harassment in the workplace (Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
30. Stockdale, M.S. (Ed.). (1996). What we know and what we need to learn about sexual harassment. In M.S. Stockdale (Vol. Ed.) Sexual harassment in the workplace (Vol. 5, pp.3-28). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
31. Valentine-French, S., & Radtke, H.L. (1989). Attributions of responsibility for an incident of sexual harassment in a university setting. Sex Roles, 21, 545-555.
32. Vaux, A. (1993). Paradigmatic assumptions in sexual harassment research: Being guided without being misled. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42 (1), 116-135.
33. Webb, S.L. (1991). Step forward: Sexual harassment in the workplace, what you need to know. New York: Mastermedia.
34. Workman, J.E., & Johnson, K.K.P. (1991). The role of cosmetics in attributions about sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 24, 759-769.