LEA criteria and the nature of EP assessment

Educational Psychology in Practice

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 128-134

  Boxer, Rik ^a   Foot, Richard ^a   Greaves, Ken ^a   Harris, Janine ^a  

^a Havering EPS The Broxhill Centere   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0005595075     PISSN: 02667363     EISSN: 14695839     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0266736980140209     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Boxer, R., Challen, M., and McCarthy, M., 1991. ‘Developing an assessment framework: the distinctive contribution of the educational psychologist’. Educational Psychology in Practice, 7(1): 30–35.
2. Coopers and Lybrand. 1996. The SEN Initiative: Managing Budgets for Pupils with Special Educational Needs, London: Coopers & Lybrand.
3. Department for Education. 1994. Code of Practice on the Identification and Assessment of Special Educational Needs, London: HMSO.
4. Department for Education and Employment. 1997. Excellence for all children - Meeting Special Educational Needs, London: HMSO.
5. Gray, P., 1997. ‘Criteria for statutory assessment’. Educational Psychology in Practice, 12(4): 210–211.
6. Lokke, C, Gersch, I., M'gadzah, H., and Frederickson, N., 1997. ‘The resurrection of psychometrics: fact or fiction?’. Educational Psychology in Practice, 12(4): 222–233.
7. Thomson, L., 1996. ‘Searching for a niche: future directions for educational psychologists’. Educational Psychology in Practice, 12(2): 99–106.
8. Williams, H., and Mallon, F., 1997. ‘The Birmingham criteria for statutory assessment: a non-psychometric approach’. Educational Psychology in Practice, 12(4): 203–209.