Quantifying crop yield response to weed populations: Applications and limitations

Biotic Stress and Yield Loss

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 205-232

  Lindquist, John L ^a   Knezevic, Stevan Z ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0005188799     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9781420040753     Document Type: Chapter

References (95)

1. Radosevich, S. R., Methods to study interactions among crops and weeds, Weed Technol., 1, 190, 1987.
2. Schweizer, E. E., Lybecker, D. W., and Wiles, L. J., Important biological information needed for bioeconomic weed management models, in Integrated Weed and Soil Management, Hatfield, J. L., Buhler, D. D., and Stewart, B. A., Eds., Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, MI, 1998.
3. Walker, R. H., and Buchanan, G. A., Crop manipulation in integrated weed management systems, Weed Sci. Suppl., 30, 17, 1982.
4. Shaw, W. C., Integrated weed management systems technology for pest management, Weed Sci. Suppl., 30, 2, 1982.
5. Swanton, C. J., and Weise, S. F., Integrated weed management: the rationale and approach, Weed Technol., 5, 648, 1991.
6. Thill, D. C., Lish, J. M., Callihan, R. M., and Bechinski, E. J., Integrated weed management- a component of integrated pest management: a critical review, Weed Technol., 5, 648, 1991.
7. Buchanan, G. A., Weed biology and competition, in Research Methods in Science, 2nd edition, Truelove, B., Ed., Southern Society of Weed Science, 1977, 25.
8. Martin, A. R., Mortensen, D. A., and Lindquist, J. L., Decision support models for weed management: in-field management tools, in Integrated Weed and Soil Management, Hatfield, J. L., Buhler, D. D., Stewart, B. A., Eds, Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, MI, 1997, 363.
9. Kropff, M. J., Modelling the effects of weeds on crop production, Weed Res., 28, 465, 1988.
10. Cousens, R. D., Design and interpretation of interference studies: Are some methods totally unacceptable? N.Z. J. Forest. Sci., 26, 5, 1996.
11. Zimdahl, R. L., Weed Crop Competition: A Review, International Plant Protection Center, Corvallis, OR, 1980.
12. Hastings, A., Population Biology: Concepts and Models, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997, chaps. 2, 4.
13. Willey, R. W., and Heath, S. B., The quantitative relationships between plant population and crop yield, Adv. Agron., 21, 281, 1969.
14. Shinozaki, K., and Kira, T., Intraspecific competition among higher plants, vii, logistic theory of the C-D effect, J. Inst. Polytech., Osaka City University ser. D7, 35, 1956.
15. Weiner, J., A neighborhood model of annual-plant interference, Ecology, 63, 1237, 1982.
16. Weiner, J., Neighborhood interference amongst Pinus rigida individuals, J. Ecol., 72, 183, 1984.
17. Pacala, S. W., and Weiner, J., Effects of competitive asymmetry on a local density model of plant interference, J. Theor. Biol., 149, 165, 1991.
18. Kira, T., Ogawa, H., Hozumi, K., Koyama, H., and Yoda, K., Intraspecific competition among higher plants, v, Supplementary notes on the C-D effect, J. Inst. Polytech., Osaka City University ser. D7, 1, 1956.
19. Bleasdale, J. K. A., and Nelder, J. A., Plant population and crop yield, Nature, 188, 342, 1960.
20. Farazdaghi, H., and Harris, P. M., Plant population and crop yield, Nature, 217, 289, 1968.
21. de Wit, C. T., On competition, Agric. Res. Report (Versl. Landbouwkd. Onderz.), 66, 1, 1960.
22. Roush, M. L., Radosevich, S. R., Wagner, R. G., Maxwell, B. D., and Peterson, T. D., A comparison of methods for measuring effects of density and proportion in plant competition experiments, Weed Sci., 37, 268, 1989.
23. Spitters, C. J. T., An alternative approach to the analysis of mixed cropping experiments. 1. Estimation of competition effects, Neth. J. Agric. Sci., 31, 1, 1983.
24. Spitters, C. J. T., Kropff, M. J., and de Groot, W., Competition between maize and Echinochloa crus-galli analysed by a hyperbolic regression model, Ann. Appl. Biol., 115, 541, 1989.
25. Snaydon, R. W., Replacement or additive designs for competition studies?, J. Appl. Ecol., 28, 930, 1991.
26. Rejmanek, M., Robinson, G. R., and Rejmankova E., Weed crop competition: experimental designs and models for analysis, Weed Sci., 37, 276, 1989.
27. Firbank, L. G., and Watkinson, A. R., On the analysis of competition within two-species mixtures of plants, J. Appl. Ecol., 22, 503, 1985.
28. Cousens, R., A simple model relating yield loss to weed density, Ann. Appl. Biol., 107, 239, 1985.
29. O’Donovan, J. T., and Blackshaw, R. E., Effect of volunteer barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) interference on field pea (Pisum sativum L.) yield and profitability, Weed Sci., 45, 249, 1997.
30. Knezevic, Z. S., Weise, S. F., and Swanton, C. J., Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) in corn (Zea mays L.), Weed Sci., 42, 568, 1994.
31. Knezevic, Z. S., Weise, S. F., and Swanton, C. J., Comparison of empirical models depicting density of Amaranthus retroflexus L. and relative leaf area as predictors of yield loss in maize (Zea mays L.), Weed Res., 35, 207, 1995.
32. Knezevic, Z. S., Horak, M. J., and Vanderlip, R. L., Relative time of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) emergence is critical in pigweed-sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) competition, Weed Sci., 45, 502, 1997.
33. Lindquist, L. J., Mortensen, D. A., Clay, S. A., Schmenk, R., Kells, J. J., Howatt, K., and Westra, P., Stability of corn (Zea mays)-velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interference relationships, Weed Sci., 44, 309, 1996.
34. Lindquist, J. L., Mortensen, D. A., Westra, P., Lambert, W. J., Bauman, T. T., Fausey, J. C., Kells, J. J., Langton, S. J., Harvey, R. G., Banken, K., Clay, S., and Bussler, B. H., Stability of corn (Zea mays)-foxtail (Setaria spp.) interference relationships, Weed Sci., 47, 195, 1999.
35. Dieleman, A., Hamill, A. S., Weise, S. F., and Swanton, C. J., Empirical models of pigweed (Amaranthus spp.) interference in soybean (Glycine max), Weed Sci., 43, 612, 1995.
36. Chikoye, D., Weise, S. F., and Swanton, C. J., Influence of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisifolia) time of emergence and density on white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), Weed Sci., 43, 375, 1995.
37. Cousens, R., Brain, P., O’Donovan, J. T., and O’Sullivan, P. A., The use of biologically realistic equations to describe the effects of weed density and relative time of emergence on crop yield, Weed Sci., 35, 720, 1987.
38. Boznic, A. C., and Swanton, C. J., Influence of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) time of emergence and density on corn (Zea mays), Weed Sci., 45, 276, 1997.
39. Cowan, P., Weaver, S. E., and Swanton, C. J., Interference between pigweed (Amaranthus spp), barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli), and soybean (Glycine max), Weed Sci., 46, 533, 1998.
40. Florez, J. A., Fischer, A. J., Ramirez, H., and Duque, M. C., Predicting rice yield losses caused by multispecies weed competition, Agron. J., 91, 87, 1999.
41. Kropff, M. J., and Spitters, C. J. T., Asimple model of crop loss by weed competition from early observations on relative leaf area of the weed, Weed Res., 31, 97, 1991.
42. Lotz, L. A. P., Christensen, S., Cloutier, D., Fernandez-Quintanilla, C., Legere, A., Lemieux, C., Lutman, P. J. W., Pardo Iglesias, A., Salonen, J., Sattin, M., Stigliani, L., and Tei, F., Prediction of the competitive effects of weeds on crop yields based on the relative leaf area of weeds, Weed Res., 36, 93, 1996.
43. Kropff, M. J., Lotz, L. A. P., Weaver, S. E., Bos, H. J., Wallinga, J., and Migo, T., A two parameter model for prediction of crop loss by weed competition from early observations of relative leaf area of the weeds, Ann. Appl. Biol., 126, 329, 1995.
44. Lindquist, J. L., Maxwell, B. D., Buhler, D. D., and Gunsolus, J. L., Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) recruitment, survival, seed production and interference in soybean (Glycine max), Weed Sci., 43, 226, 1995.
45. Swinton, S. M., and King, R. P., A bioeconomic model for weed management in corn and soybean, Agric. Sys., 44, 313, 1994.
46. Wilkerson, G. G., Modena, S. A., and Coble, H. D., HERB: Decision model for postemergence weed control in soybean, Agron. J., 83, 413, 1991.
47. Coble, H. D., and Mortensen, D. A., The threshold concept and its application to weed science, Weed Technol., 6, 191, 1992.
48. Jordan, N., Weed demography and population dynamics: Implications for threshold management, Weed Technol., 6, 184, 1992.
49. Maxwell, B. D., Weed thresholds: the space component and considerations for herbicide resistance, Weed Technol., 6, 205, 1992.
50. Wilkerson, G. G., Modena, S. A., and Coble, H. D., HERB v2.0: Herbicide decision model for postemergence weed control in soybeans, Users manual. Bull. No. 113, Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 1988.
51. Neeser, C., Dieleman, J. A., Mortensen, D. A., and Martin A. R., WeedSOFT: state of the art weed management decision support system, Weed Technol., (in review), 2000.
52. Headley, J. C., Defining the economic threshold, in Pest Control Strategy for the Future, National Academy Science, Washington D.C., 1972, 101.
53. Stern, V. M., Smith, R. F., van den Bosh, R. and Hagen, K. S., The integrated control concept, Hilgardia, 29, 81, 1959.
54. Cousens, R., Theory and reality of weed control thresholds, Plant Prot. Quart., 2, 13, 1987.
55. Bauer, T. A., and Mortensen, D. A., A comparison of economic and economic optimum threshold for two annual weeds in soybeans, Weed Technol., 6, 228, 1992.
56. Cardina, J., Regnier, E., and Sparrow, D., Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) competition and economic thresholds in conventional and no-tillage corn (Zea mays), Weed Sci., 43, 81, 1995.
57. Auld, B. A., Menz, D. M., and Tisdell, C. A., Weed Control Economics, Academic Press, London, 1987, 177.
58. Norris, R. F., Weed thresholds in relation to long-term population dynamics, Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci., 37, 38, 1984.
59. Owen, M. D. K., Producer attitudes and weed management, in Integrated Weed and Soil Management, Hatfield, J. L., Buhler, D. D., and Stewart, B. A., Eds., Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, MI, 1998, 43.
60. Weersink, A., Deen, W., and Weaver, S., Evaluation of alternative decision rules for postemergence herbicide treatments in soybean, J. Prod. Agric., 5, 298, 1992.
61. Norris, R. F., Case history for weed competition/population ecology: barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in sugar beets (Beta vulgaris), Weed Technol., 6, 220, 1992.
62. Sattin, M., Zanin, G., and Berti, A., Case history for weed competition/population ecology: velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) in corn (Zea mays), Weed Technol., 6, 213, 1992.
63. Doyle, C. J., Cousens, R., and Moss, S. R., Economics of controlling Alopecurus myosuroides in winter wheat, Crop Prot., 5, 143, 1987.
64. Wallinga, J., Analysis of the rational long-term herbicide use: evidence for herbicide efficacy and critical weed kill rate as key factors, Agric. Syst., 56, 323, 1998.
65. Lindquist, J. L., Mortensen, D. A., Westra, P., Kells, J. J., and Clay, S., Performance of INTERCOM for predicting the effects of maize-velvetleaf competition across the north central USA, Weed Sci., (in review), 2000.
66. Teasdale, J. R., Influence of corn (Zea mays) population and row spacing on corn and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) yield, Weed Sci., 46, 447, 1998.
67. Dieleman, J. A., and Mortensen, D. A., Influence of weed biology and ecology on development of reduced dose strategies for integrated weed management systems, in Integrated Weed and Soil Management, Hatfield, J. L., Buhler, D. D., and Stewart, B. A., Eds., Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, MI, 1998, 333.
68. Steckel, L. E., DeFelice, M. S., and Sims, B. D., Integrating reduced rates of postemergence herbicides and cultivation for broadleaf weed control in soybeans (Glycine max), Weed Sci., 38, 541, 1990.
69. Buhler, D. D., Gunsolus, J. L., and Ralston, D. F., Common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) control in soybean (Glycine max) with reduced bentazon rates and cultivation, Weed Sci., 41, 447, 1993.
70. Schmenk, R., and Kells, J. J., Effect of soil-applied atrazine and pendimethalin on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) competitiveness in corn, Weed Technol., 12, 47, 1998.
71. Weaver, S. E., Size-dependent economic thresholds for three broadleaf weed species in soybeans, Weed Technol., 5, 674, 1991.
72. Lindquist, J. L., and Mortensen, D. A., Tolerance and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) suppressive ability of two old and two modern corn (Zea mays) hybrids, Weed Sci., 46, 569, 1998.
73. Lindquist, J. L., Mortensen, D. A., and Johnson, B. E., Mechanisms of corn tolerance and velvetleaf suppressive ability, Agron. J., 90, 787, 1998.
74. Tollenaar, M., and Aguilera, A., Radiation use efficiency of an old and a new maize hybrid, Agron. J., 84, 536, 1992.
75. Tollenaar, M., Dibo, A. A., Aguilera, A., Wiese, S. F., and Swanton, C. J., Effect of crop density on weed interference in maize, Agron. J., 86, 591, 1994.
76. Tollenaar, M., Nissanka, S. P., Aguilera, A., Weise, S. F., and Swanton, C. J., Effect of weed interference and soil nitrogen on four maize hybrids, Agron. J., 46, 596, 1994.
77. McLachlan, S. M., Tollenaar, M., Swanton, C. J., and Weise, S. F., Effect of corn-induced shading on dry matter accumulation, distribution, and architecture of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus), Weed Sci., 41, 568, 1993.
78. Murphy, D. S., Yakubu, Y., Weise, S. F., and Swanton, C. J., Effects of planting patterns and inter-row cultivation on competition between corn (Zea mays) and late emergingweeds, Weed Sci., 44, 856, 1996.
79. Dingkuhn, M., Johnson, D. E., Sow, A., and Audebert, A. Y., Relationships between upland rice canopy characteristics and weed competitiveness, Field Crops Res., 61, 79, 1999.
80. Swinton, S. M., Buhler, D. D., Forcella, F., Gunsolus, J. L., and King, R. P., Estimation of crop yield loss due to interference by multiple weed species, Weed Sci., 42, 103, 1994.
81. Berti, A., and Zanin, G., Density equivalent: a method for forecasting yield loss caused by mixed weed populations, Weed Res., 34, 327, 1994.
82. Brain, P., and Cousens, R., The effect of weed distribution on predictions of yield loss, J. Appl. Ecol., 27, 735, 1990.
83. Fischer, D. W., Harvey, R. G., Bauman, T. T., Hart, S. E., Johnson, G. A., Kells, J. J., Lindquist, J. L., and Westra, P., Effects of Chenopodium album competition with Zea mays in a regional study, Weed Sci. (in review), 2000.
84. Gerowitt, B., and Heitefuss, R., Weed economic thresholds in cereals in the Federal Republic of Germany, Crop Prot., 9, 323, 1990.
85. Thomas G. A., Weed survey system used in Saskatchewan for cereal and oilseed crops, Weed Sci., 33, 34, 1985.
86. van Groenendael, J. M., Patchy distribution of weeds and some implications for modelling population dynamics: a short literature review, Weed Res., 28, 437, 1988.
87. Johnson, G. A., Mortensen, D. A., Young, L. Y., and Martin, A. R., The stability of weed seedling population models and parameters in eastern Nebraska corn (Zea mays) and soybean (Glycine max) fields, Weed Sci., 43, 604, 1995.
88. Navas, M. L., Using plant population biology in weed research: a strategy to improve weed management, Weed Res., 31, 171, 1991.
89. Thornton, P. K., Fawcett, R. H., Dent, J. B., and Perkins, T. J., Spatial weed distribution and economic thresholds for weed control, Crop Prot., 9, 337, 1990.
90. Wiles, L. J., Oliver, G. W., York, A. C., Gold, H. J., and Wilkerson, G. G., Spatial distribution of broadleaf weeds in North Carolina soybean (Glycine max) fields, Weed Sci., 40, 554, 1992.
91. Auld, B. A., and Tisdell, C. A., Influence of spatial distribution of weeds on crop yield loss, Plant Prot. Quart., 3, 81, 1988.
92. Nordbo, E., and Christensen, S., Spatial variability of weeds, in Proceedings of the Seminar on Site Specific Farming, Olesen, S. E., Ed., Danish Institute of Plant and Soil Science, SP-report No. 26, 1995.
93. Lindquist, J. L., Dieleman, J. A., Mortensen, D. A., Johnson, G. A., and Pester-Wyse, D. Y., Economic importance of managing spatially heterogeneous weed populations, Weed Technol., 12, 7, 1998.
94. Tilman, D., Mechanisms of plant competition for nutrients: the elements of a predictive theory of competition, in Perspectives on Plant Competition, Grace, J. B., and Tilman, D., Eds., Academic Press, San Diego, 1990, chap. 7.
95. Lang, A. L., Pendleton, J. W., and Dungan, G. H., Influence of population and nitrogen levels on yield and protein and oil contents of nine corn hybrids, Agron. J., 48, 1956.