Interactive information retrieval: Context and basic notions

Informing Science

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 57-61

  Robins, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Information retrieval; Interactive information retrieval; Interactive models

Indexed keywords

EID: 0005071995     PISSN: 15214672     EISSN: 15214672     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.28945/577     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Barry, C. L. (1994). User-defined relevance criteria: An exploratory study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(3), 149-159.
2. Belkin, N. J. (1980). Anomalous states of knowledge as a basis for information retrieval. Canadian Journal of Information Science, 5, 133-143.
3. Belkin, N. J. (1996) Intelligent information retrieval: Whose intelligence? In: ISI '96: Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium for Information Science. Konstanz: Universtaetsverlag Konstanz, 25-31.
4. Belkin, N. J., Brooks, H. M. & Daniels, P. J. (1987). Knowledge elicitation using discourse analysis. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 27, 127-144.
5. Blair, D. C. (1990). Language and representation in information retrieval. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
6. Dervin, B. & Nilan, M. (1986). Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 21, 3-33.
7. Fidel, R. (1985). Moves in online searching. Online Review, 9(1), 61-74.
8. Ingwersen, P. (1996). Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval. Journal of Documentation, 52(1), 3-50.
9. Jansen, B.J., Spink, A., Bateman, J. & Saracevic, T. (1998). Searchers, the subjects they search, and sufficiency: A study of a large sample of EXCITE searches. In Proceedings of Webnet 98.
10. Kuhlthau, C. C. (1991). Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user's perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 361-371.
11. Leonard, L. E. (1975). Inter-indexer consistency and retrieval effectiveness: Measurement of relationships. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana.
12. Maron, M. E. & Kuhns, J. L. (1969). On relevance, probabilistic indexing and information retrieval. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 7, 216-244.
13. NSF 99-167 (1999). Information Technology Research Program. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/1999/nsf99167/nsf99167.htm.
14. Robins, D. (1998a). Dynamics and dimensions of user information problems as foci of interaction in information retrieval. ASIS '98: Proceedings of the 61st ASIS Annual Conference, 35, 327-341.
15. Salton, G. (1972). A new comparison between conventional indexing (MEDLARS) and automatic text processing (SMART). Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 23, 75-84.
16. Saracevic, T. (1997). The stratified model of information retrieval inter action: Extension and application. Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 34, 313-327.
17. Saracevic, T. & Kantor, P. (1988). A study of information seeking and retrieving. III. Searchers, searches, and overlap. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 39(3), 197-216.
18. Spink, A. (1993). Feedback in information retrieval. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University.
19. Spink, A. (1997). Study of interactive feedback during mediated information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(5), 382-394.
20. Spink, A., Goodrum, A. & Robins, D. (1998). Elicitation behavior during mediated information retrieval. Information Processing and Management, 34(2/3), 257-273.
21. Spink, A. & Greisdorf, H. (1997). Partial Relevance Judgments During Interactive Information Retrieval: An Exploratory Study. Sixtieth Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 34, 111-122.
22. Spink, A., Wilson, T. D., Ellis, D. & Ford, N. (1998). Modeling users' successive searches in digital environments. D-Lib Magazine, (April, 1998), http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april98/04spink.html.
23. Taylor, R. S. (1968). Question-negotiation and information seeking. College and Research Libraries, 29, 178-194.
24. Turtle, H. (1994). Natural language vs. Boolean query evaluation: A comparison of retrieval performance. In W. B. Croft & C. J. van Rijsbergen (Eds.), SIGIR '94: Proceedings of the seventeenth annual international ACM-SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (pp. 212-220). London: Springer-Verlag.
25. Wu, M. M. (1993). Information interaction dialog: A study of patron elicitation in the information retrieval interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University.
26. th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 34, 101-110.