Partial relevance judgments during interactive information retrieval: An exploratory study

Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting

Volumn 34, Issue , 1997, Pages 111-122

  Spink, Amanda ^a   Greisdorf, Howard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3242814441     PISSN: 00447870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bates, M. J. (19960. Document familiarity, relevance and Bradford's Law: The Getty Online Searching Project Report No. 5. Information Processing and Management, 32(6), 697-707.
2. Bookstein, A. (1997). Infometric distributions. III. Ambiguity and randomness. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(1), 2-10.
3. Eisenberg, M. B. (1988). Measuring relevance judgments. Information Processing and Management, 24(4), 373-389.
4. Eisenberg, M. B., & Barry, C. L. (1988). Order effects: A study of the possible influence of presentation order on user judgments of document relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 39(5), 293-300.
5. Eisenberg, M. B., & Hu, X. (1987). Dichotomous relevance judgments and the evaluation of information systems. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 24, 66-70.
6. Ellis, D. (1989). A behavioral approach to information retrieval systems design. Journal of Documentation, 45(3), 171-212.
7. Harman, D. (1992). Relevance feedback revisited. Proceedings of the 15th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, June 21-24 (pp. 1-10).
8. Ingwersen, P. (1996). Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval interaction: Elements of a cognitive IR theory. Journal of Documentation, 52(1), 3-50.
9. Ingwersen, P., & Borlund, P. (1996). Information transfer as interactive cognitive processes. Proceedings of COLIS 2 Second International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science: Integration in Perspective, October 13-16, 1996; Royal School of Librarianship, Copenhagen, Denmark (pp. 219-232).
10. Kuhlthau, C. C. (1994). Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information science. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
11. Pao, M. L. (1993). Term and citation retrieval: A field study. Information Processing and Management, 29(1), 95-112.
12. Regazzi, J. J. (1988). Performance measures for information retrieval systems: An experimental approach. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 39(4), 235-251.
13. Robertson, S. E., & Hancock-Beaulieu, M. (1992). On the evaluation of IR systems. Information Processing and Management, 28(4), 457-466.
14. Rorvig, M. E. (1988). Psychometric measurement and information retrieval. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 23, 157-189.
15. Saracevic, T. (1975). Relevance: A review of and framework for the thinking on the notion in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 26(6), 321-343.
16. Saracevic, T. (1995). Evaluation of evaluation in information retrieval. Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGIR International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. Association of Computing Machinery, Seattle, WA (pp. 138-146)
17. Saracevic, T. (1996a). Interactive models in information retrieval (IR): A review and proposal. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 33, 3-9.
18. Saracevic, T. (1996b). Relevance reconsidered. Proceedings of COLIS 2: Second International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science: Integration in Perspective, October 13-16, 1996. The Royal School of Librarianship, Copenhagen - Denmark, (pp. 201-218).
19. Saracevic, T., Kantor, P. B., Chamis, A. Y., & Trivison, D. (1988). A study of information seeking and retrieving: Part I. Background and methodology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 39(3), 161-176.
20. Saracevic, T., & Su, L. (1990). Modeling and measuring the user-intermediary-computer interaction in online searching. Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 26, 75-80.
21. Schamber, L. (1994). Relevance and information behavior. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 29, 3-48.
22. Sparck Jones, K. (1995). Reflections on TREC. Information Processing and Management, 31(3), 291-314.
23. Spink, A. (1996). A multiple search session model of end-user behavior: An exploratory study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(8), 603-609.
24. Spink, A. (1997). A study of interactive feedback during mediated online searching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science.
25. Spink, A., & Bateman, J. (1996). Interactive information retrieval and relevance: An information seeking approach. Unpublished paper. School of Library and Information Science, University of North Texas.
26. Spink, A., & Losee, R. M. (1996). Feedback in information retrieval. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 31, 33-78.
27. Tiamiyu, M. A., & Ajiferuke, I. Y. (1988). A total relevance and document interaction effects model for the evaluation of information retrieval processes. Information Processing and Management, 24, 391-404.
28. Williams, F. W. (1992). Reasoning with statistics: How to read quantitative research. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.