The realities of incorporating sustainable development into local-level planning: A case study of Davidson, North Carolina

Cities

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 219-226

  Thomas, Deborah S K ^a   Furuseth, Owen J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Local level planning; Sustainable development

Indexed keywords

EID: 0004650751     PISSN: 02642751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0264-2751(97)00006-1     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Audirac, I and Shermyen, A (1994) An evaluation of neotraditional design's social prescription: postmodern placebo or remedy for suburban malaise?. Journal of Planning Education and Research 13, 161-173.
2. Daly, H E (1990) Sustainable growth: an impossibility theorem. Development 3, 45-47.
3. Davidson General Plan (1993) Guidance Through the Year 2010. Davidson, NC.
4. Felleman, J (1994) Deep information: the emerging role of state land information systems in environmental sustainability. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association 6(2), 11-24.
5. Generalized Land Plan (1985) Generalized Land Plan 2005, Charlotte - Mecklenburg. Adopted 25 November 1985. Prepared by the Charlotte - Mecklenburg Planning Commission, Charlotte, NC.
6. Katz, P (1993) The New Urbanism, Toward an Architecture of Community. McGraw-Hill, New York.
7. Lehrer, U A and Milgrom, R (1996) New (sub) urbanism: countersprawl or repackaging the product. Capitalism Nature Socialism 7, 49-64.
8. Maser, C (1997) Sustaintainable Community Development: Principles and Concepts. St Lucie Press, FL.
9. McDonald, G T (1996) Planning as sustainable development. Journal of Planning Education and Research 15(3) 000-000.
10. Miller, D (1996) Sustainability indicators in the Pacific Northwest. Paper presented at the Joint International Congress of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning and AESOP, Toronto, July.
11. Walz, K (1995) Consensus building for sustainable communities. Carolina Planning 20, 36-43.