Should Eliminating Unmet Need for Contraception Continue to Be a Program Priority?

International Family Planning Perspectives

Volumn 25, Issue 9999, 1999, Pages

  Jain, Anrudh ^a  

^a POPULATION COUNCIL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0003016318     PISSN: 01622749     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2991870     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Sinding S, Ross J and Rosenfield A, Seeking common ground: unmet need and demographic goals, International Family Planning Perspectives, 1994, 20(1):23-27.
2. Westoff CF and Bankole A, The potential demographic significance of unmet need, International Family Planning Perspectives, 1996, 22(1):16-20.
3. Robey B, Rutstein SO and Morris L, The fertility decline in developing countries, Scientific American, 1993, 269(6):60-67;
4. and Ross J, The question of access, Studies in Family Planning, 1995, 26(4):241-242.
5. Bongaarts J and Bruce J, The causes of unmet need for contraception and the social content of services, Studies in Family Planning, 1995, 26(2)57-75.
6. Casterline J, Perez AE and Biddlecom A, Factors underlying unmet need for family planning in the Philippines, Studies in Family Planning, 1997, 28(3):173-191.
7. Dixon-Mueller R and Germain A, Stalking the elusive "unmet need" for family planning, Studies in Family Planning, 1992, 23(5):330-335.
8. Ross J, 1995, op. cit. (see reference 3).
9. Bongaarts J and Bruce J, 1995, op. cit. (see reference 4).
10. Westoff CF and Bankole A, Unmet Need: 1990-1994, DHS Comparative Studies, Calverton, MD, USA: Macro International, 1995, No. 16.
11. Ibid.
12. Jain A, Fertility reduction and the quality of family planning services, Studies in Family Planning, 1989, 20(1):1-16.
13. See, for example, Mensch B, Miller RA and Miller VC, Focusing on quality with "situation analysis," IPPF Challenges, 1994, No. 2, pp. 17-21.
14. DeGraff DS and de Silva V, A new perspective on the definition and measurement of unmet need for contraception, International Family Planning Perspectives, 1996, 22(4):140-147.
15. Department for Economic and Social Information and Policy Analysis, ICPD Programme of Action, New York: United Nations, 1994, p. 32.