Who benefits from virtuality?

Computers and Education

Volumn 34, Issue 3-4, 2000, Pages 163-176

  Harper, Barry ^a   Hedberg, John G ^a   Wright, Rob ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

Author keywords

Architectures for educational technology systems; Interactive leaning environments; Multimedia system; Pedagogical issues

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002919717     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00043-3     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1989). A project 2061 report on literacy goals in science, mathematics and technology. Washington, DC: AAAS.
2. Anderson J.R., Reder L.M., Simon H.A. Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher. 25:(4):1996;5-11.
3. Anderson J.R., Reder L.M., Simon H.A. Situative versus cognitive perspectives: form versus substance. Educational Researcher. 26:(1):1997;18-21.
4. Berryman, S. E. (1991). Designing effective learning environments: cognitive apprenticeship models. ERIC Document 337 689, 1-5.
5. Bransford J., Goldman S.R., Vye N.J. Making a difference in peoples' abilities to think: reflections on a decade of work and some hopes for the future. Okagaki L., Sternberg R.J. Directors of development: influences on children. 1991;147-180 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
6. Brown J.S., Collins A., Duguid P. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher. 18:(1):1989;32-41.
7. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (CTGV). (1993). Integrated Media: toward a theoretical framework for utilizing their potential. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12(2), 76-89.
8. Cunningham D., Duffy T.M., Knuth R. Textbook of the future. McKnight C. Hypertext: A psychological perspective. 1993;Ellis Horwood, London.
9. Department of Employment, Education and Training (DEET) (1989). Discipline review of teacher education in mathematics and science. Volumes 1-3. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
10. Driscoll M.P. Psychology of learning for instruction. 1994;Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA.
11. Duffy T.M., Cunningham D.J. Constructivism: implications for the design and delivery of instruction. Jonassen D.H. Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology. 1996;Macmillan Library Reference USA, New York.
12. Exploring the Nardoo. (1996) Canberra: Interactive Multimedia, Project Manager Barry Harper, Instructional Design Barry Harper, John Hedberg, Rob Wright, Grant Farr and Christine Brown (A CD-ROM based interactive multimedia package produced in collaboration with NSW Department of Land and Water Conservation).
13. Grabinger R.S., Dunlap J.C. Rich environments for active learning: a definition. Association for Learning Technology Journal. 2:(3):1995;5-34.
14. Grabinger R.S. Rich environments for active learning. Jonassen D.H. Handbook of research for educational communications and technology. 1996;Macmillan Library Reference USA, New York.
15. Greeno J. A perspective on thinking. American Psychologist. 44:1989;134-141.
16. Hannafin M.J., Land S.M. The foundations and assumptions of technology-enhanced student centres learning environments. Instructional Science. 25:1997;167-202.
17. Harper, B., Hedberg, J., Corderoy, R., & Wright, R. (in press). Employing cognitive tools within interactive multimedia applications, Chapter 9. In Susanne P. Lajoie (Ed.), Computers as cognitive tools: The next generation, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaun.
18. Hedberg J.G., Alexander S. Virtual reality in education: defining researchable issues. Educational Media International. 31:(4):1996;214-220.
19. Hedberg J., Harper B. Supporting ill-structured problem solving in interactive multimedia learning environments. Chan T.-W., Collins A., Lin J. Proceedings of ICCE'98 vol. 1, Beijing, China, October 14-17. 1998;701-706 China Higher Education Press/Springer-Verlag, Beijing/Heidelberg.
20. Hedberg J.G., Harper B., Lockyer L., Ferry B., Brown C., Wright R. Supporting learners to solve ill-structured problems. Corderoy R. Flexibility: The next wave. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. December 14-16th. 1998;317-327 University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW.
21. Honebein P.C., Duffy T.M., Fishman B.J. Constructivism and the design of authentic learning environments: context and authentic activities for learning. Duffy T.M., Lowyck J., Jonassen D.H. Designing environments for constructive learning. 1993;87-108 Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
22. Jonassen D.H. Thinking technology: toward a constructivist design model. Educational Technology. 34:(3):1994;34-37.
23. Jonassen D.H., Tessmer M. An outcomes-based taxonomy for instructional systems design, evaluation, and research. Training Research Journal. 2:1996/97;11-46.
24. Jonassen D.H., Peck K.L., Wilson B.G. Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. 1999;Prentice-Hall, NJ.
25. Laurillard, D., (1996). The Changing University. Paper #13. ITFORUM://www.tile.net./tile/listserv/itforum.html. University of Georgia.
26. National Council of Teacher's of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
27. Rieber L.P. Computer-based microworlds: a bridge between constructivism and direct instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40:(1):1992;93-106.
28. Savery J.R., Duffy T.M. Problem based learning: an instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology. 35:(5):1995;31-38.
29. Schank R.C., Cleary C. Engines for education. 1995;Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
30. Squires D. Can multimedia support constructivist learning? Teaching Review. 4:(2):1996;10-17.
31. Tessmer M., Richey R.C. The role of context in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology, Research & Development, 45:(2):1997;85-115.
32. Whitehead A.N. The aims of education and other essays. 1929;MacMillan, New York.
33. Winn W., Bricken W. Designing virtual worlds for use in mathematics education: the example of experiential algebra. Educational Technology. 32:(12):1992;12-19.
34. Wright R., Hedberg J.G., Harper B. Learner construction of knowledge: using stagestruck to develop a performance. Corderoy R. Flexibility: The next wave. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. December 14-16. 1998;673-679 University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW.
35. StageStruck. (1998). Sydney: National Institute for Dramatic Arts (NIDA), Project Director Amanda Morris, Multimedia Producer John Hedberg, Instructional Design John Hedberg, Amanda Morris, Rob Wright, (A CD-ROM based interactive multimedia package produced as part of the Australia on CD program of the Department of Communications and the Arts).