International politics is not foreign policy

Security Studies

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 54-57

  Waltz, Kenneth N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002487538     PISSN: 09636412     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09636419608429298     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Kenneth N. Waltz, Theory of International Politics (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979). In what follows, I take the theory presented in that book as an example of international-political theory in general.
2. For an attempt to explain differences in foreign-policy performance between the United States and Britain, see Kenneth N. Waltz, Foreign Policy and Democratic Politics (1967; reprint, Berkeley: University of California, Institute of Governmental Studies, 1992).
3. E. H. Chamberlain, The Theory of Monopolistic Competition: A Reorientation of the Theory of Value (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1933);
4. Joan Robinson, The Economics of Imperfect Competition (London: Macmillan, 1933).
5. Competition among the Few is the title of William Fellner's book (New York: Knopf, 1949).
6. Colin Elman, "Horses for Courses: Why Not Neorealist Theories of Foreign Policy?" Security Studies 6, no. 1 (autumn 1996): 7-51, 33.
7. Cf. Waltz, "Reflections on Theory of International Politics: A Response to My Critics." In Neorealism and its Critics, ed. Robert O. Keohane (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986), 322-45.