On conceptual analysis and educational research: A response to John Wilson

Cambridge Journal of Education

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 239-241

  Bridges, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002112608     PISSN: 0305764X     EISSN: 14693577     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0305764980280210     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Bridges, D., 1997. Philosophy and educational research: a reconsideration of epistemological boundaries. Cambridge Journal of Education, 27: 177–190.
2. Dunlop, F.N., 1970. Education and human nature. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain, IV: 21–44.
3. Earwaker, J., 1973. R.S. Peters and the concept of education. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain, VII: 239–259.
4. Naish, M., 1984. Education and essential contestability. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 18: 141–153.
5. Peters, R.S., 1967. “ Education as initiation ”. In The Concept of Education, Edited by: Peters, R.S., London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
6. Reddiford, G., 1972. Conceptual analysis and education. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain, VI: 193–215.
7. Snook, I., 1972. Concepts of Indoctrination, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
8. Walsh, P., 1985. Education: one concept in many uses. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 19: 167–180.
9. White, J., and White, P., Analytic philosophy on education and children's rights. paper presented to the Seminar on Philosophical Method. October1997. University of Amsterdam.
10. Wilson, J., 1998. Philosophy and educational research: a reply to David Bridges et al. Cambridge Journal of Education, 28: 129–133.