Hemispheric Differences in Global/Local Processing Revealed by Same-Different Judgements

Visual Cognition

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 457-478

  Hübner, Ronald ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001693137     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713756793     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alivisatos, B., & Wilding, J., (1982). Hemispheric differences in matching Stroop-lype letter stimuli. Cortex, 18, 5-22.
2. Bagnara, S., Boles, D.B., & Simion, F. (1983). Symmetry and similarity effects in the comparison of visual patterns. Perception and Psychophysics, 34, 578-584.
3. Bagnara. S., Boles, D.B., Simion, F., & Umilta, C. (1982). Can an analytic/holistic dichotomy explain hemispheric asymmetries? Cortex, 18, 67-78.
4. Bamber, D. (1969). Reaction times and error rates for "same"-"different" judgments of multidimensional stimuli. Perception and Psychophysics, 6, 169-174.
5. Boles, D.B. (1981). Variability in letter-matching asymmetry. Perception and Psychophysics, 29, 285-288.
6. Boles, D.B. (1984). Global versus local processing: Is there a hemispheric dichotomy? Neuropsychologia, 22, 445-455.
7. Boles, D.B. (1994). An experimental comparison of stimulus type, display type, and input variable contributions to visual field asymmetry. Brain and Cognition. 24, 184-197.
8. Boles, D.B., & Karner, T.A. (1996). Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing: Still unclear. Brain and Cognition, 30, 232-243.
9. Bradshaw, J.L., & Nettleton (1981). The nature of hemispheric specialization in man. The Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 4, 51-63.
10. Davidson, R.J., & Hugdahl, K. (Eds.) (1995). Brain asymmetry, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Eriksen, C.W., O'Hara, W.P., & Eriksen, B. (1982). Response competition effects in same-different judgments. Perception and Psychophysics, 32, 261-270.
12. Eviatar, Z., Zaidel, E., & Wickens, T. (1994). Nominal and physical decision criteria in same-different judgments. Perception and Psychophysics, 56, 62-72.
13. Fink, G.R., Halligan, P.W., Marshall, J.C., Frith, C.D., Frackowiak, R.S.J., & Dolan, R.J. (1996). Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees? Nature, 382 (August), 626-628.
14. Hillger, L.A., & Koenig, O. (1991). Separable mechanisms in face processing: Evidence from hemispheric specialization. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 42-58.
15. Hoffman, J.E. (1980). Interaction between global and local levels of a form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 222-234.
16. Hübner, R. (1997). The effect of spatial frequency on global precedence and hemispheric differences. Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 187-201.
17. Humphreys, B.W., Riddoch, M.J., & Quinlan, P.T. (1985). Interaction processes in perceptual organization: Evidence from visual agnosia. In M.I. Posner & O.S.M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance: XI. Mechanisms of attention. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
18. Kinchla, R.A., Solis-Macias, V., & Huffman, J. (1983). Attention to different levels of structure in a visual image. Perception and Psychophysics, 33, 1-10.
19. Krueger, L.E. (1978). A theory of perceptual matching. Psychological Review, 85, 278-304.
20. Lamb, M.R., Robertson, L.C., & Knight, R.T. (1990). Component mechanisms underlying the processing of hierarchically organized patterns: Inferences from patients with unilateral cortical lesions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 471-483.
21. Martin, M. (1979). Local and global processing: The role of sparsity. Memory and Cognition, 7, 476-484.
22. Miller, J. (1981). Global precedence in attention and decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1161-1174.
23. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
24. Navon, D. (1991). Testing the queue hypothesis for processing global and local information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 173-189.
25. Patterson, K., & Bradshaw, J.L. (1975). Differential hemispheric mediation of nonverbal visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 246-252.
26. Proctor, R.W. (1981). A unified theory for matching task phenomena. Psychological Review, 88, 291-326.
27. Robertson, L.C., & Lamb, M.R. (1991). Neuropsychological contributions to theories of part/whole organization. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 299-330.
28. Robertson, L.C., Lamb, M.R., & Zaidel, E. (1993). Interhemispheric relations in processing hierarchical patterns: Evidence from normal and commisurotomized subject. Neuropsychology, 7, 325-342.
29. Rosenberger, J.L., & Gasko, M. (1984). Comparing location estimators: Trimmed means, medians, and trimean. In D.C. Hoaglin, F. Mosteller, & W.J. Tukey (Eds.). Understanding robust and explanatory data analysis (pp. 297-338). New York: Wiley & Sons.
30. Sergent, J. (1982). The cerebral balance of power: Confrontation or cooperation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 253-272.
31. Sperry, R.W. (1974). Lateral specialization in the surgically separated hemispheres. In F.O. Schmitt & F.G. Worden (Eds.), The neurosciences third study program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. St James, J.D, & Eriksen, C.W. (1991). Response competition produces a "fast same effect" in same-different judgments. In G.R. Lockhead & J.R. Pomerantz (Eds.), The perception of structure. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
33. Taylor, D.A. (1976). Effects of identity in the multiletter matching task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 417-428.
34. Van Kleeck, M.H. (1989). Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli by normal subjects: New data and a meta-analysis of previous studies. Neuropsychologia, 27, 1165-1178.