Eliminating artifacts in the study of singularity/mixedness of taste stimuli

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 181-193

  Rochman, Dana ^a   Guinard, Jean Xavier ^a   O'Mahony, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031523747     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.1997.tb00062.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. AVENET, P. and LINDEMANN, B. 1989. Perspectives of taste perception. J. Memb. Biol. 112, 1-8.
2. CAIRNCROSS, S.E. and SJÖSTRÖM, L.B. 1950. Flavor profiles - A new approach to flavor problems. Food Technol. 4, 308-311.
3. CAUL, J.F. 1957. The profile method of flavor analysis. Adv. Food Res. 7, 1-40.
4. CHADWICK, D., MARSH, J. and GOODE, J. (Eds.) 1993. The Molecular Basis of Smell and Taste Transduction. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
5. CORNSWEET, T.N. 1962. The staircase-method in psychophysics. Am. J. Psychol. 75, 485-491.
6. ERICKSON, R.P. 1982. Studies on the perception of taste: Do primaries exist? Physiol. Behav. 28, 57-62.
7. ERICKSON, R.P. and COVEY, E. 1980. On the singularity of taste sensations: What is a primary? Physiol. Behav. 25, 527-533.
8. GREEN, B. and GELHARD, B. 1989. Salt as an oral irritant. Chem. Senses 14, 259-271.
9. GREEN, D.M. and SWETS, J.A. 1966. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
10. HOOTMAN, R.C. (Ed.) 1992. Manual on Descriptive Analysis Testing for Sensory Evaluation, ASTM Manual Series: MNL13, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA.
11. KINNAMON, S.C. and CUMMINGS, T.A. 1992. Chemosensory transduction mechanisms in taste. Ann. Rev. Physiol. 54, 715-731.
12. KUZNICKI, J.T. and TURNER, L.S. 1988. Temporal dissociation of taste mixture components. Chem. Senses 13, 45-62.
13. MEILGAARD, M., CIVILLE, G.V. and CARR, B.T. 1991. Sensory Evaluation Techniques, 2nd Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
14. MOSKOWITZ, H.R. 1972. Perceptual changes in taste mixtures. Percept. Psychophys. 11, 257-262.
15. NEWELL, G.J. and MacFARLANE, J.D. 1987. Expanded tables for multiple comparison procedures in the analysis of ranked data. J. Food Sci. 52, 1721-1725.
16. O'MAHONY, M. 1992. Understanding discrimination tests: A user-friendly treatment of response bias, rating and ranking R-index tests and their relationship to signal detection. J. Sensory Studies 7, 1-47.
17. O'MAHONY, M., ATASSI-SHELDON, S., ROTHMAN, L. and MURPHY-ELLISON, T. 1983. Relative singularity/mixedness judgements for selected taste stimuli. Physiol. Behav. 31, 749-755.
18. SCHIFFMAN, S.S. 1990. The role of sodium and potassium transport pathways in taste transduction: An overview. Chem. Senses 15, 129-135.
19. SCHIFFMAN, S.S. and ERICKSON, R.P. 1980. The issue of primary tastes versus a taste continuum. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 4, 109-117.
20. SHEPHERD, G.M. 1991. Sensory transduction: Entering the mainstream of membrane signaling. Cell 67, 845-851.
21. SIMON, S.A. and ROPER, S.D. 1993. Mechanisms of Taste Transduction, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
22. STAMPANONI, C.R. 1993. The quantitative flavor profiling technique. Perfum. Flav. 18, 19-24.
23. STONE, H., SIDEL, J., OLIVER, S., WOOLSEY, A. and SINGLETON, R.C. 1974. Sensory evaluation by quantitative descriptive analysis. Food Technol. 28, 24-34.
24. YE, Q., HECK, G.L. and DESIMONE, J. A. 1991. The anion paradox in sodium taste reception: Resolution by voltage clamp studies. Science 254, 724-726.