Structural equation modeling: Back to basics

Structural Equation Modeling

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 353-369

  Mueller, Ralph O ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001269696     PISSN: 10705511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10705519709540081     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317-332.
2. Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). AMOS 3.5 [Computer software]. Chicago: SmallWaters.
3. Asher, H. B. (1983). Causal modeling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4. Austin, J. T., & Calderón, R. F. (1996). Theoretical and technical contributions to structural equation modeling: An updated annotated bibliography. Structural Equation Modeling, 3, 105-175.
5. Baumrind, D. (1983). Specious causal attributions in the social sciences: The reformulated steppingstone theory of heroin use as exemplar. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1289-1298.
6. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
7. Bentler, P. M. (1993). EQS: Structural equations program manual. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.
8. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
9. Bentler, P. M., & Dudgeon, P. (1996). Covariance structure analysis: Statistical practice, theory, directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 541-570.
10. Bentler, P. M., & Wu, E. J. C. (1995). EQS For Windows 5.0. [Computer software]. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
11. Blalock, H. M. (1964). Causal inferences in nonexperimental research. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
12. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
13. Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (Eds.). (1993). Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14. Browne, M. W. (1984). Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 62-83.
15. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1989). Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 445-455.
16. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17. Bullock, H. E., Harlow, L. L., & Mulaik, S. A. (1994). Causation issues in structural equation modeling research. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 253-267.
18. Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Cliff, N. (1983). Some cautions concerning the application of causal modeling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 115-126.
20. Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p<.05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.
21. Cudeck, R., & Browne, M. W. (1983). Cross-validation of covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 147-167.
22. Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 16-29.
23. Duncan, O. D. (1975). Introduction to structural equation models. New York: Academic.
24. Duncan, O. D., Haller, A. O., & Portes, A. (1968). Peer influence on aspiration: A reinterpretation. American Journal of Sociology, 74, 119-134.
25. Fan, X. (1996). An SAS Program for assessing multivariate normality. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 668-674.
26. Freedman, D. A. (1987). As others see us: A case study in path analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 12 (2), 101-128.
27. Glymour, C, Scheines, R., Spirtes, P., & Kelly, K. (1987). Discovering causal structure: Artificial intelligence, philosophy of science, and statistical modeling. Orlando, FL: Academic.
28. Hayduk, L. A. (1987). Structural equation modeling with LISRELBaltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
29. Holland, P. W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 945-960.
30. Hoyle, R. H. (Ed.). (1995). Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. (1982). Causal analysis: Models, assumptions, and data. Beverly Hills: Sage.
32. Jöreskog, K. G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 294-316). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1981). Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood and least squares methods (Research Report 81-8). Uppsala, Sweden: University of Uppsala.
34. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1995). LISREL 8 with PRELIS 2 For Windows. [Computer software]. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
35. Kaplan, D. (1990). Evaluating and modifying covariance structure models: A review and recommendation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 137-155.
36. Kenny, D. A. (1979). Correlation and causality. New York: Wiley.
37. Kirk, R. E. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Methods, 56, 746-759.
38. Ling, R. (1983). Review of "Correlation and Causality" by David Kenny. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 489-491.
39. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149.
40. Marcoulides, G. A., & Schumacker, R. E. (Eds.). (1996). Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
41. Marini, M. M., & Singer, B. (1988). Causality in the social sciences. In C. C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological methodology: Vol. 18 (pp. 347-409). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
42. Marsh, H. W., Baila, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391-410.
43. Mueller, R. O. (1996). Basic principles of structural equation modeling: An introduction to LISREL and EQS. New York: Springer-Verlag.
44. Mulaik, S. A. (1987). Toward a conception of causality applicable to experimentation and causal modeling. Child Development, 58, 18-32.
45. Mulaik, S. A. (1993). Objectivity and multivariate statistics. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 171-203.
46. Mulaik, S. A., & James, L. R. (1995). Objectivity and reasoning in science and structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 118-137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47. Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 430-445.
48. Muthén, B. O. (1992). Response to Freedman's critique of path analysis: Improve credibility by better methodological training. In J. P. Shaffer (Ed.), The role of models in nonexperimental social science: Two debates (pp. 80-86). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
49. Rothenberg, T. J. (1992). Comments on Freedman's paper. In J. P. Shaffer (Ed.), The role of models in nonexperimental social science: Two debates (pp. 98-99). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
50. Schmidt, F. (1996). Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for the training of researchers. Psychological Methods, 1, 115-129.
51. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
52. Shaffer, J. P. (Ed.). (1992). The role of models in nonexperimental social science: Two debates. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
53. Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180.
54. Tanaka, J. S. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 10-39). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
55. Thompson, B. (1996). AERA editorial policies regarding statistical significance testing: Three suggested reforms. Educational Researcher, 25(2), 26-30.
56. Thompson, B. (Ed.). (1993). Statistical significance testing in contemporary practice [Special issue]. The Journal of Experimental Education, 61 (4).
57. Thompson, B. (1990). MULTINOR: A FORTRAN program that assists in evaluating multivariate normality. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 845-848.
58. Tremblay, P. F., & Gardner, R. C. (1996). On the growth of structural equation modeling in psychological journals. Structural Equation Modeling, 3, 93-104.
59. West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling (pp. 56-75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60. Wolfle, L. M. (1985). Applications of causal models in higher education. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 1, pp. 381-413). New York: Agathon.