Quantitative discourse psychology

Discourse Processes

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 229-263

  Graesser, Arthur C ^a   Swamer, Shane S ^a   Hu, Xiangen ^a  

^a University of Memphis   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001216060     PISSN: 0163853X     EISSN: 15326950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01638539709544993     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Albrecht, J.E., O'Brien, E.J., Mason, R.A. & Myers, J.L. (1995). The role of perspective in the accessibility of goals during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 364-372.
2. Anderson, J.R. (1992). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Banfield, A. (1982). Unspeakable sentences: Narration and representation in the language of fiction. Boston: Routledge.
4. Bakhtin, M.M. (1981). In M. Holoquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination (pp. {slug}- {slug}). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
5. Bower, G.H., Black, J.B., and Turner, T.J. (1979). Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 177-220.
6. Bowers, C.A. (1996). Tracking Character Knowledge In Narrative. Unpublished Dissertation, The University of Memphis, Tennessee.
7. Britton, B.K. & Graesser, A.C. (Eds.). (1996). Models of understanding text. Mahwah,, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Britton, B.K. & Gulgoz, S. (1991). Using Kintsch's computational model to improve instructional text: Effects of repairing inference calls on recall and cognitive structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 329-45.
9. Chafe, W. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10. Chatman, S.B. (1978). Story and discourse: Narrative structure in fiction and film. Ithica, NY: Cornell University Press.
11. Clark, H.H. & Clark, E.V. (1977). Psychology and language. New York: Harcourt Brace.
12. Clark, H.H. & Schaefer, E.F. (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13, 259-294.
13. Clark, H.H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Cleeremans, A. & McClelland, J.L. (1991). Learning the structure of event sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 720, 235-253.
15. Cohen, P.A, Kulik, J.A. & Kulik, C.C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A metanalysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 237-248.
16. D'Andrade, R.G. & Wish (1985). Speech act theory in quantitative research on interpersonal behavior. Discourse Processes, 8, 229-259.
17. de Vega, M., Diaz, J.M. & Leon, I. (in press). To know or not to know: Comprehending protagonists' beliefs and their emotional consequences. Discourse Processes.
18. Duchman, J.F., Bruder, G.A. & Hewitt, L.E. (Eds.). (1995). Deixis in Narratives: A cognitive Science Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Elman, J.L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179-211.
20. Fodor, J.D. (1983). Modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
21. Foltz, P.W. (1996). Latent semantic analysis for text-based research. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28, 197-202.
22. Gernsbacher, M.A. (Ed.). (1994). Handbook of psycholinguistics. New York: Academic Press.
23. Gernsbacher, M.A., Goldsmith, H.H. & Robertson, R.R. (1992). Do readers mentally represent character's emotional states? Cognition and Emotion, 6, 89-112.
24. Goldman, S.R., Varma, S. & Cote, N. (1996). Extending capacity-constrained construction integration: toward "smarter" and flexible models of text comprehension. In B.K. Britton & A.C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 73-114). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Graesser, A.C, Bovvers, C.A., Bayen, U.J., Hu, X. (in press). Who said what? Who knows what? Tracking speakers and knowledge in narrative. In W. van Peer and S. Chatman (Eds.), Narrative perspective: Cognition and emotion. Buffalo, NY: SUNY University Press.
26. Graesser, A.C. & Clark, L.F. (1985). Structures and procedures of implicit knowledge. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
27. Graesser, A.C, Higginbotham, M.W., Robertson, S.P. & Smith, W.R. (1978). A natural inquiry into the National Enquirer: Self-induced versus task-induced reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, I, 355-372.
28. Graesser, A.C, Hoffman, N.L. & Clark, L.F. (1980). Structural components of reading time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 131-151.
29. Graesser, A.C, Millis, K.K. & Zwaan. R.A. (1997). Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 163-189.
30. Graesser, A.C. & Person, N.K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. Amer icon Educational Research Journal, 31, 104-137.
31. Graesser, A.C, Person, N.K., & Magliano, J.P. (1995). Collaborative dialogue patterns in natualistic one-to-one tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 1-28.
32. Graesser, A.C, Person, N. & Johnston, G.S. (1996). Three obstacles in empirical research on aesthetic and literary comprehension. In R.J. Kreuz & M.S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
33. Graesser, A.C. & Riha, J.R. (1984). An application of multiple regression techniques to sentence reading times. In D. Kieras & M. Just (Eds.), New methods in reading comprehension research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Graesser, A.C, Singer, M. & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 10], 371-395.
35. Graesser, A.C., Svvamer, S.S., Baggett, W.B. & Sell, M.A. (1996). New models of deep comprehension. In B. K. Britton & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 1-32). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Grimshaw, A.D. (1989). Collegial discourse: Professional conversation among peers. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
37. Haberlandt, K. & Graesser, A.C. (1985). Component processes in text comprehension and some of their interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 357- 374.
38. Haberlandt, K. & Graesser, A.C. (1989). Buffering new information during reading. Discourse Processes, 12, 479-494.
39. Jacob, R.J.K. (1983). Using formal specifications in the design of human-computer interface. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 26, 126-133.
40. Johnson, M.K., Hashtroudi, S. & Lindsay, D.S. (1993). Source Monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
41. Just, M.A. & Carpenter, P.A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329-354.
42. Just, M.A. & Carpenter, P.A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122-149.
43. Keysar, B. (1994). The illusory transparency of intention: Linguistic perspective taking in text. Cognitive Psychology, 26, 165-208.
44. Kieras, D. & Just, M. (Eds.). (1984) New methods in comprehension research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Kintsch, W. (1974). The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A constructive integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
47. Kintsch, W. (1994). Text comprehension, memory, and learning. American Psychologist, 49, 294-303.
48. Kreuz, R.J., MacNealy, M.S. (1996). Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics. In R. Freedle (Ed.), Advances in discourse processes. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
49. Landauer, T.K. & Dumais, S.T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
50. Leech, G.N. & Short, M.H. (1981). Style in fiction: Linguistic introduction to aesthetics. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
51. Lorch, R.F. & O'Brien, E.J. (Eds.). (1995). Sources of coherence in reading. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Lorch, R.F., Klusewitz, M.A. & Lorch, E.P. (1995). In R. F. Lorch & E.J. O'Brien (Eds.). (1995). Sources of coherence in reading. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
53. Long, D.L., Golding, J.M. & Graesser, A.C. (1992). Test of the on-line status of goal- related inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 634-647.
54. Magliano, J.P., Graesser, A.C., Eymard, L.A., Haberlandt, K. & Gholson, B. (1993). The locus of interpretive and inference processes during text comprehension: a comparison of gaze durations and word reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 704-709.
55. Magliano, J.P. & Graesser, A.C. (1991). A three-pronged method for studying inference generation in literary text. Poetics, 20, 193-232.
56. Mandler, J.M. (1984). Stories, scripts, and scenes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
57. McArthur, D., Stasz, C. & Zmuidzinas, M. (1990). Tutoring techniques in algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 7, 197-244.
58. McKoon, G. & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440-466.
59. Mehan, H. (1979). "What time is Denise?": Asking known-information questions in classroom discourse. Theory into Practice, IS, 285-294.
60. Millis, K. & Graesser, A.C. (1994). The time-course of constructing knowledge-based inferences for scientific texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 583-599.
61. Millis, K.K., Morgan, D. & Graesser, A.C. (1990). The influence of knowledge-based inferences on reading time for expository text. In A. C. Graesser & G. H. Bower (Eds.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Inferences and text comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
62. O'Brien, E.J., Raney, G.E., Albrecht, J.E. & Rayner, K. (in press). Processes involved in the resolution of explicit anaphors. Discourse Processes.
63. Perfetti, C.A., Britt, M.A. & Georgi, M.C. (1995). Text-based learning and reasoning: Studies in history. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Person, N.K., Kreuz, R.J., Zwaan, R. & Graesser, A.C. (1995). Pragmatics and pedagogy: Conversational rules and politeness strategies may inhibit effective tutoring. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 161-188.
65. Person, N.K., Graesser, A.C, Magliano, J.P. & Kreuz, R.J. (1994). Inferring what the student knows in one-to-one tutoring: the role of student questions and answers. Learning and Individual Differences, 6, 205-229.
66. Riefer, D.M., Hu, X. & Batchelder, W.H. (1994). Response strategies in source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 680-693.
67. Rubin, D.C (1995). Memory in oral traditions: The cognitive psychology of epic, ballads, and counting-out-rhymes. New York: Oxford University Press.
68. Schegloff, E.A. & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289 - 327.
69. Schmalhofer, F. & Glavanov, D. (1986). Three components of understanding a programmer's manual: Verbatim, propositional, and situational representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 279-294.
70. Schober, M.F. (in press). Different kinds of conversational perspective taking. In S.R. Fussel & R.J. Kreuz (Eds.), Social and cognitive psychological approaches to interpersonal communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
71. Sinclair, F.M. & Coulthard, R.M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. London: Oxford University press.
72. Singer, M., Graesser, A.C. & Trabasso, T. (1994). Minimal or global inference during reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 421-41.
73. Swamer, S.S. (1996). A Connectionist Analysis of Speech Act Patterns in Two-Party Conversation. Unpublished Dissertation, The University of Memphis, Tennessee.
74. Trabasso, T. & Magliano, J.P. (1996). Conscious understanding during comprehension. Discourse Processes, 21, 255-287.
75. Turner, E.H. & Cullingforrd, R.E. (1989). Using Conversation in MOPs in Natural-language Interfaces. Discourse Processes, 12, 63-90.
76. van Oostendorp, H. & Zwaan, R.A. (Eds.). (1994). Naturalistic text comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
77. Weaver, C.A., Mannes, S. & Fletcher, C.R. (Eds.). (1995). Discourse comprehension: Strategies and processing revisitEd. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
78. Zwaan, R.A. (1993). Aspects of literary comprehension. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
79. Zwaan, R.A., Magliano, J.P. & Graesser, A.C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 386-397.