Ecological correlates of number of subdigital lamellae in anoles

Herpetologica

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 192-199

  Glossip, Danielle ^a   Losos, Jonathan B ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anolis; Habitat use; Lamellae; Toe pad

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001162399     PISSN: 00180831     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. BURNELL, K L., AND S. B. HEDGES. 1990. Relationships of West Indian Anolis (Sauria: Iguanidae): An approach using slow-evolving protein loci. Carib. J. Science. 26:7-30.
2. CANNATELLA, D. C., AND K. DE QUEIROZ. 1989. Phylogenetic systematics of the anoles: Is a new taxonomy warranted? Syst. Zool. 38:57-68.
3. CARTMILL, M. 1985 Climbing. Pp. 73-88. In M. Hildebrand, D. M. Bramble, K. F. Liem, and D B. Wake, (Eds.), Functional Vertebrate Morphology. Belknap Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
4. COLLETTE, B. B. 1961. Correlations between ecology and morphology in anoline lizards from Havana, Cuba and southern Florida. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 125:137-162.
5. _. 1962. Arboreality, lamellae, and body size in two species of Cuban geckos. Copeia 1962:644-645.
6. DIXON, J. R., AND R. B. HUEY. 1970. Systematics of the lizards of the gekkonid genus Phyllodactylus of mainland South America. Los Angeles County Mus. Contrib Sci. 192:1-78.
7. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125:1-15.
8. FLORES, G., J. H. LENZYCKI, AND J. PALUMBO, JR. 1994. An ecological study of the endemic Hispaniolan anoline, Chamaelinorops barbouri (Lacertilia: Iguanidae). Breviora 499:1-23.
9. FORSGAARD, K. 1983. The axial skeleton of Chamaelinorops. Pp. 284-295. In A. G. J. Rhodin and K. Miyata, (Eds.), Advances in Herpetology and Evolutionary Biology: Essays in Honor of Ernest E. Williams. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
10. GARLAND, T., Jr., P. H. HARVEY, AND A. R. IVES. 1992. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst. Biol. 41:18-32.
11. GUYER, C., AND J. M. SAVAGE. 1986. Cladistic relationships among anoles (Sauria: Iguanidae). Syst. Zool. 35:509-531.
12. HASS, C. A., S. B. HEDGES, AND L. R. MAXSON. 1993. Molecular insights into the relationships and biogeography of West Indian anoline lizards. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 21:97-114.
13. HEDGES, S. B., AND K. L. BURNELL 1990. The Jamaican radiation of Anolis (Sauria: Iguanidae). An analysis of relationships and biogeography using sequential electrophoresis. Carib. J. Sci. 26:31-44.
14. HICKS, R. A., AND R. L. TRIVERS. 1983. The social behavior of Anolis valencienni. Pp. 570-595 In A. G J. Rhodin and K. Miyata, (Eds.), Advances in Herpetology and Evolutionary Biology: Essays in Honor of Ernest E. Williams. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
15. HILLER, U. 1968. Untersuchungen zum Feinbau und zur Funktion der Haftborsten von Reptilien. Z. Morphol. Tiere 62:307-362.
16. _. 1975. Comparative studies on the functional morphology of two gekkonid lizards. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 73:278-282.
17. HUEY, R. B., AND J. R. DIXON. 1970. A new Pseudogonatodes from Peru with remarks on other species of the genus Copeia 1970:538-542.
18. IRSCHICK, D. J., C. C AUSTIN, K. PETREN, R. N. FISHER, J B. LOSOS, AND O. ELLERS. 1996. A comparative analysis of clinging ability among padbearing lizards. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 59:21-35.
19. IRSCHICK, D. J., AND J. B. LOSOS. 1996. Morphology, ecology, and behavior of the twig anole Anolis angusticeps. Pp. 291-301. In R. Powell and R. W. Henderson, (Eds.), Contributions to West Indian Herpetology: A Tribute to Albert Schwartz. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles: Ithaca, New York.
20. JENSSEN, T A., AND P. C. FEELY 1991. Social behavior of the male anoline lizard Chamaelinorops barbouri, with a comparison to Anolis. J. Herpetol. 25:454-462.
21. JENSSEN, T A., N. GREENBERG, AND K. A. HOVDE. 1995. Behavioral profile of free-ranging male lizards, Anolis carolinensis, across breeding and post-breeding seasons. Herpetol. Monogr. 8:41-62.
22. LARSON, A., AND J. B. LOSOS. 1996. Phylogenetic systematics of adaptation. Pp. 187-220. In G. Lauder and M. Rose, (Eds.), Adaptation. Academic Press, New York, New York
23. LISTER, B C. 1976 The nature of niche expansion in West Indian Anolis lizards I: Ecological consequences of reduced competition. Evolution 30:659-676.
24. LOSOS, J. B. 1990a. Concordant evolution of locomotor behaviour, display rate, and morphology in Anolis lizards. Anim. Behav. 39:879-890.
25. _ 1990b Ecomorphology, performance capability, and scaling of West Indian Anolis lizards: An evolutionary analysis. Ecol. Monogr. 60:369-388.
26. _. 1992. The evolution of convergent structure in Caribbean Anolis communities. Syst. Biol. 41:403-420.
27. MOERMOND, T. C. 1979. The influence of habitat structure on Anolis foraging behavior. Behaviour 70:147-167.
28. _. 1981. Prey-attack behavior of Anolis lizards. Z. Tierpsychol. 56:128-136.
29. OLIVER, J. A. 1951. "Gliding" in amphibians and reptiles, with a remark on an arboreal adaptation in the lizard, Anolis carolinensis carolinensis Voigt. Am. Nat. 85:171-176.
30. PETERSON, J. A. 1983. The evolution of the subdigital pad in Anolis. I. Comparisons among the anoline genera. Pp. 245-283. In A. G. J. Rhodin and K. Miyata, (Eds.), Advances in Herpetology and Evolutionary Biology. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
31. PIANKA, E. R. 1986. Ecology and Natural History of Desert Lizards: Analyses of the Ecological Niche and Community Structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
32. PIANKA, E. R., AND H. D. PIANKA. 1976. Comparative ecology of twelve species of nocturnal lizards (Gekkonidae) in the Western Australian desert. Copeia 1976:125-142.
33. PURVIS, A., AND T. GARLAND, Jr. 1993. Polytomies in comparative analyses of continuous characters. Syst. Biol. 42:569-575.
34. ROUGHGARDEN, J., AND S. PACALA. 1989. Taxon cycle among Anolis lizard populations: Review of the evidence. Pp. 403-432. In D. Otte and J. Endler (Eds.), Speciation and Its Consequences. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
35. RUIBAL, R., AND V. ERNST. 1965. The structure of the digital setae of lizards. J. Morphol. 117:271-294.
36. RUMMEL, J. D., AND J. ROUGHGARDEN. 1985. Effects of reduced perch-height separation on competition between two Anolis lizards. Ecology 66: 430-444.
37. SCHOENER, T. W. 1967. The ecological significance of sexual dimorphism in size in the lizard Anolis conspersus. Science 155:474-477.
38. _. 1968. The Anolis lizards of Bimini: Resource partitioning in a complex fauna. Ecology 49:704-726.
39. STAMPS, J. A., J. B LOSOS, AND R. M. ANDREWS. 1997. A comparative study of population density and sexual size dimorphism in lizards. Am. Nat 149:64-90.
40. WILLIAMS, E. E. 1972. The origin of faunas. Evolution of lizard congeners in a complex island fauna: A trial analysis. Evol. Biol. 6:47-89.
41. _. 1983. Ecornorphs, faunas, island size, and diverse end points in island radiations of Anolis. Pp. 326-370. In R. B. Huey, E R. Pianka, and T. W. Schoener (Eds.), Lizard Ecology: Studies of a Model Organism. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
42. WILLIAMS, E. E., AND J. A. PETERSON. 1982. Convergent and alternative designs in the digital adhesive pads of scincid lizards. Science 215:1509-1511.