Phase-sensitive observables as a route to understanding molecular continua

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 111, Issue 20, 1999, Pages 9168-9182

  Seideman, Tamar ^a  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000906743     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.479831     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. The classic example is the RKR method: J. R. Rydberg, Z. Phys. 73, 376 (1931); O. Klein, ibid. 76, 226 (1932); A. L. G. Rees, Proc. Phys. Soc. London 59, 998 (1946).
2. The classic example is the RKR method: J. R. Rydberg, Z. Phys. 73, 376 (1931); O. Klein, ibid. 76, 226 (1932); A. L. G. Rees, Proc. Phys. Soc. London 59, 998 (1946).
3. The classic example is the RKR method: J. R. Rydberg, Z. Phys. 73, 376 (1931); O. Klein, ibid. 76, 226 (1932); A. L. G. Rees, Proc. Phys. Soc. London 59, 998 (1946).
4. F. Remacle, R. D. Levine, and J. L. Kinsey, Chem. Phys. Lett. 205, 67 (1993).
5. M. Shapiro, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 7859 (1996).
6. T. Seideman, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 6487 (1995).
7. T. P. Rakitzis and R. N. Zare, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 3341 (1999).
8. V. Blanchet, M. Zgierski, T. Seideman, and A. Stolow, Nature 401, 52 (1999).
9. T. Seideman, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 7859 (1997).
10. A. Scholl, L. Baumgarten, R. Jacquemin, and W. Eberhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 5146 (1997).
11. L. Zhu, V. D. Kleiman, X. Li, L. Lu, K. Trentelman, and R. J. Gordon, Science 270, 77 (1995).
12. L. Zhu, K. Suto, J. A. Fiss, R. Wada, T. Seideman, and R. J. Gordon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4108 (1997).
13. J. A. Fiss, L. Zhu, R. J. Gordon, and T. Seideman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 65 (1998).
14. J. A. Fiss, A. Khachatrian, L. Zhu, R. J. Gordon, and T. Seideman, Faraday. Discuss. (in press).
15. P. Brumer and M. Shapiro, Chem. Phys. Lett. 126, 541 (1986).
16. For a review see, for instance, P. Brumer, and M. Shapior, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 43, 257 (1992).
17. For a review see, R. J. Gordon and S. A. Rice, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 48, 595 (1997).
18. ab in much of the previous literature and its origin is clear from Eq. (2). We avoid this term in the present paper so as not to risk confusion with the partial-wave phase shift of scattering theory.
19. T. Seideman, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 1915 (1998).
20. R. Uberna, Z. Amitay, R. A. Loomis, and S. R. Leone, Faraday Discuss. (in press).
21. I. Fischer, M. J. J. Vrakking, D. M. Villeneuve, and A. Stolow, Chem. Phys. 207, 331 (1996).
22. H. Lefebvre-Brion, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 2544 (1997).
23. T. Nakajima, J. Zhang, and P. Lambropoulos, J. Phys. B 30, 1077 (1997).
24. P. Lambropoulos and T. Nakajima, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2266 (1999).
25. S. Lee, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 2734 (1997); 108, 3903 (1998).
26. S. Lee, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 2734 (1997); 108, 3903 (1998).
27. For theoretical studies of the autoionization spectroscopy of HI, see H. Lefebvre-Brion, A. Giusti-Suzor, and G. Raseev, J. Chem. Phys. 83, 1557 (1985). Experimental studies were reported by D. J. Hart and J. W. Hepburn, Chem. Phys. 129, 51 (1989). See also the work of A. Mank, M. Drescher, T. Huth-Fehre, N. Böwering, U. Heinzmann, and H. Lefebvre- Brion, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 1676 (1991).
28. For theoretical studies of the autoionization spectroscopy of HI, see H. Lefebvre-Brion, A. Giusti-Suzor, and G. Raseev, J. Chem. Phys. 83, 1557 (1985). Experimental studies were reported by D. J. Hart and J. W. Hepburn, Chem. Phys. 129, 51 (1989). See also the work of A. Mank, M. Drescher, T. Huth-Fehre, N. Böwering, U. Heinzmann, and H. Lefebvre- Brion, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 1676 (1991).
29. For theoretical studies of the autoionization spectroscopy of HI, see H. Lefebvre-Brion, A. Giusti-Suzor, and G. Raseev, J. Chem. Phys. 83, 1557 (1985). Experimental studies were reported by D. J. Hart and J. W. Hepburn, Chem. Phys. 129, 51 (1989). See also the work of A. Mank, M. Drescher, T. Huth-Fehre, N. Böwering, U. Heinzmann, and H. Lefebvre-Brion, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 1676 (1991).
30. For an introduction see R. D. Levine, Quantum Mechanics of Molecular Rate Processes (Clarendon, Oxford, 1969).
31. A. R. Edmonds, Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1960).
32. See, for instance, T. Seideman, Chem. Phys. Lett. 253, 279 (1996).
33. U. Fano, Phys. Rev. 124, 1866 (1961).
34. R. G. Newton, Scattering Theory of Waves and Particles (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966).
35. W. M. McClain and R. A. Harris, in Excited States, edited by E. C. Lim, (Academic, New York, 1977), Vol. 3, pp. 1-56.
36. R. N. Zare, Angular Momentum (Wiley, New York, 1988).
37. T. Seideman, manuscript in preparation.
38. It is not essential that the electronic curves cross (at some level of approximation). In case they do not, however, they should become energetically degenerate in the atomic limit to be simultaneously observed. In the latter case kinetic (radial derivative) coupling is generally non-negligible since it is likely to become comparable to the energy separation before the potential curves become a constant function of the internuclear distance. See, for instance, S. J. Singer, K. F. Freed, and Y. B. Band, J. Chem. Phys. 79, 6060 (1983).
39. Z. Chen, P. B. Brumer, and M. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. A 52 , 2225 (1995); F. Wang, C. Chen, and D. S. Elliott, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2416 (1996).
40. Z. Chen, P. B. Brumer, and M. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. A 52 , 2225 (1995); F. Wang, C. Chen, and D. S. Elliott, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2416 (1996).
41. R. J. Gordon (private communication).
42. X. Wang, R. Bersohn, K. Takahashi, M. Kawasaki, and H. L. Kim, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 2992 (1992).
43. A. Abrashkevich, M. Shapior, and P. Brumer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3789 (1998).
44. E. Dupont, P. B. Corkum, H. C. Liu, M. Buchanan, and Z. R. Wasilewski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3596 (1995).
45. A. Hachè, Y. Kostoulas, R. Atanasov, J. L. P. Hughes, J. E. Sipe, and H. M. van Driel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 306 (1997).
46. W. Potz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3262 (1997).